Makefile | 4 +- arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c | 24 ++++++++++ drivers/acpi/battery.c | 12 +++++ drivers/acpi/video_detect.c | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/crypto/qat/qat_common/qat_crypto.c | 8 ++++ drivers/nfc/st21nfca/se.c | 10 ++++ drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_st7789v.c | 2 + net/ipv6/ip6_output.c | 4 +- net/llc/af_llc.c | 8 ++++ net/mac80211/cfg.c | 3 -- net/netfilter/nf_tables_core.c | 2 +- sound/core/pcm_native.c | 4 ++ sound/pci/ac97/ac97_codec.c | 4 +- sound/pci/cmipci.c | 3 +- sound/usb/mixer_quirks.c | 7 +-- 15 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.309 release.
There are 14 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 27 Mar 2022 15:04:08 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.9.309-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.9.y
and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Linux 4.9.309-rc1
Linus Lüssing <ll@simonwunderlich.de>
mac80211: fix potential double free on mesh join
Giovanni Cabiddu <giovanni.cabiddu@intel.com>
crypto: qat - disable registration of algorithms
Werner Sembach <wse@tuxedocomputers.com>
ACPI: video: Force backlight native for Clevo NL5xRU and NL5xNU
Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
ACPI: battery: Add device HID and quirk for Microsoft Surface Go 3
Mark Cilissen <mark@yotsuba.nl>
ACPI / x86: Work around broken XSDT on Advantech DAC-BJ01 board
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
netfilter: nf_tables: initialize registers in nft_do_chain()
Giacomo Guiduzzi <guiduzzi.giacomo@gmail.com>
ALSA: pci: fix reading of swapped values from pcmreg in AC97 codec
Jonathan Teh <jonathan.teh@outlook.com>
ALSA: cmipci: Restore aux vol on suspend/resume
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
ALSA: usb-audio: Add mute TLV for playback volumes on RODE NT-USB
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
ALSA: pcm: Add stream lock during PCM reset ioctl operations
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
llc: fix netdevice reference leaks in llc_ui_bind()
Oliver Graute <oliver.graute@kococonnector.com>
staging: fbtft: fb_st7789v: reset display before initialization
Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@linaro.org>
net: ipv6: fix skb_over_panic in __ip6_append_data
Jordy Zomer <jordy@pwning.systems>
nfc: st21nfca: Fix potential buffer overflows in EVT_TRANSACTION
-------------
Diffstat:
Makefile | 4 +-
arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c | 24 ++++++++++
drivers/acpi/battery.c | 12 +++++
drivers/acpi/video_detect.c | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/crypto/qat/qat_common/qat_crypto.c | 8 ++++
drivers/nfc/st21nfca/se.c | 10 ++++
drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_st7789v.c | 2 +
net/ipv6/ip6_output.c | 4 +-
net/llc/af_llc.c | 8 ++++
net/mac80211/cfg.c | 3 --
net/netfilter/nf_tables_core.c | 2 +-
sound/core/pcm_native.c | 4 ++
sound/pci/ac97/ac97_codec.c | 4 +-
sound/pci/cmipci.c | 3 +-
sound/usb/mixer_quirks.c | 7 +--
15 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
Hi!
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.309 release.
> There are 14 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
CIP testing did not find any problems here:
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-4.9.y
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de>
Best regards,
Pavel
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 04:04:28PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.309 release. > There are 14 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sun, 27 Mar 2022 15:04:08 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > Build results: total: 163 pass: 163 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 397 pass: 397 fail: 0 Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Guenter
On Fri, 25 Mar 2022 at 20:34, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.309 release. > There are 14 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sun, 27 Mar 2022 15:04:08 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.9.309-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.9.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org> ## Build * kernel: 4.9.309-rc1 * git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git * git branch: linux-4.9.y * git commit: ebc053b844b704373fb74ff8f019e29785bed7e9 * git describe: v4.9.308-15-gebc053b844b7 * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-4.9.y/build/v4.9.308-15-gebc053b844b7 ## Test Regressions (compared to v4.9.308) No test regressions found. ## Metric Regressions (compared to v4.9.308) No metric regressions found. ## Test Fixes (compared to v4.9.308) No test fixes found. ## Metric Fixes (compared to v4.9.308) No metric fixes found. ## Test result summary total: 60629, pass: 47943, fail: 552, skip: 10058, xfail: 2076 ## Build Summary * arm: 254 total, 238 passed, 16 failed * arm64: 32 total, 32 passed, 0 failed * dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * i386: 19 total, 19 passed, 0 failed * juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * mips: 22 total, 22 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 31 total, 31 passed, 0 failed ## Test suites summary * fwts * kselftest-android * kselftest-arm64 * kselftest-breakpoints * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-drivers * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kvm-unit-tests * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * packetdrill * ssuite * v4l2-compliance * vdso -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
On 3/25/22 9:04 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.309 release. > There are 14 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sun, 27 Mar 2022 15:04:08 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.9.309-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.9.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h > Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions. Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> thanks, -- Shuah
On 3/25/22 08:04, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.309 release. > There are 14 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sun, 27 Mar 2022 15:04:08 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.9.309-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.9.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h On ARCH_BRCMSTB, using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels: Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> PS: is there any reason why the Spectre BHB patches from here are not part of linux-stable/linux-4.9.y? -- Florian
On 3/25/22 14:31, Florian Fainelli wrote: > On 3/25/22 08:04, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.309 release. >> There are 14 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response >> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please >> let me know. >> >> Responses should be made by Sun, 27 Mar 2022 15:04:08 +0000. >> Anything received after that time might be too late. >> >> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: >> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.9.309-rc1.gz >> >> or in the git tree and branch at: >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git >> linux-4.9.y >> and the diffstat can be found below. >> >> thanks, >> >> greg k-h > > On ARCH_BRCMSTB, using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels: > > Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> > > PS: is there any reason why the Spectre BHB patches from here are not > part of linux-stable/linux-4.9.y? Meant to provide this link, from here: https://gitlab.arm.com/linux-arm/linux-jm/-/tree/bhb/v3/v4.9.302 -- Florian
Hi Florian, On 26/03/2022 00:00, Florian Fainelli wrote: > On 3/25/22 14:31, Florian Fainelli wrote: >> On 3/25/22 08:04, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.309 release. >>> There are 14 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response >>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please >>> let me know. >>> >>> Responses should be made by Sun, 27 Mar 2022 15:04:08 +0000. >>> Anything received after that time might be too late. >>> >>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: >>> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.9.309-rc1.gz >>> or in the git tree and branch at: >>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.9.y >>> and the diffstat can be found below. >>> >>> thanks, >>> >>> greg k-h >> >> On ARCH_BRCMSTB, using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels: >> >> Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> >> >> PS: is there any reason why the Spectre BHB patches from here are not part of >> linux-stable/linux-4.9.y? > > Meant to provide this link, from here: > > https://gitlab.arm.com/linux-arm/linux-jm/-/tree/bhb/v3/v4.9.302 These were from before the disclosure date. Since then the 'backport everything' approach was investigated more, but we decided not to go that way. These trees need the bugs we subsequently discovered fixing, retesting and reposting. I was on holiday last week. I plan to get to it this week. Thanks, James
On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 02:31:59PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote: > On 3/25/22 08:04, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.309 release. > > There are 14 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Sun, 27 Mar 2022 15:04:08 +0000. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.9.309-rc1.gz > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.9.y > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > On ARCH_BRCMSTB, using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels: > > Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> > > PS: is there any reason why the Spectre BHB patches from here are not part > of linux-stable/linux-4.9.y? Because they were not submitted for inclusion :(
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.