kernel/printk/printk.c | 12 ++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Update printk_seq for suppressed message.
Affects 5.9-rt and 5.10-rt
When message is suppressed, printk_seq should be updated, otherwise
this message will be printed when reboot. This problem was introduced
in commit 3edc0c85d154 ("printk: Rebase on top of new ring buffer").
Signed-off-by: Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com>
---
kernel/printk/printk.c | 12 ++++++++++--
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk.c b/kernel/printk/printk.c
index 0c56873396a9..f68c4ba7eb4d 100644
--- a/kernel/printk/printk.c
+++ b/kernel/printk/printk.c
@@ -2826,8 +2826,17 @@ static int printk_kthread_func(void *data)
if (!(con->flags & CON_ENABLED))
continue;
- if (suppress_message_printing(r.info->level))
+ printk_seq = atomic64_read(&con->printk_seq);
+
+ if (suppress_message_printing(r.info->level)) {
+ /*
+ * Skip record we have buffered and already printed
+ * directly to the console when we received it, and
+ * record that has level above the console loglevel.
+ */
+ atomic64_cmpxchg_relaxed(&con->printk_seq, printk_seq, seq);
continue;
+ }
if (con->flags & CON_EXTENDED) {
len = info_print_ext_header(ext_text,
@@ -2843,7 +2852,6 @@ static int printk_kthread_func(void *data)
printk_time);
}
- printk_seq = atomic64_read(&con->printk_seq);
console_lock();
console_may_schedule = 0;
--
2.29.0
On 2022-03-21, Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com> wrote:
> Update printk_seq for suppressed message.
>
> Affects 5.9-rt and 5.10-rt
>
> When message is suppressed, printk_seq should be updated, otherwise
> this message will be printed when reboot. This problem was introduced
> in commit 3edc0c85d154 ("printk: Rebase on top of new ring buffer").
>
> Signed-off-by: Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
Nice catch. Thanks.
5.15-rt also has this issue, although the fix is slightly different. For
5.15-rt, writing to con->printk_seq (via latched_seq_write()) requires
the console locked. Would you like to post a patch for 5.15-rt as well,
or would you like me to do it?
5.16 and beyond does not have this issue.
John Ogness
Luis,
Care to add this patch into the 5.10-rt stable?
Thanks,
-- Steve
On Mon, 21 Mar 2022 10:36:55 +0106
John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de> wrote:
> On 2022-03-21, Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Update printk_seq for suppressed message.
> >
> > Affects 5.9-rt and 5.10-rt
> >
> > When message is suppressed, printk_seq should be updated, otherwise
> > this message will be printed when reboot. This problem was introduced
> > in commit 3edc0c85d154 ("printk: Rebase on top of new ring buffer").
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
>
> Nice catch. Thanks.
>
> 5.15-rt also has this issue, although the fix is slightly different. For
> 5.15-rt, writing to con->printk_seq (via latched_seq_write()) requires
> the console locked. Would you like to post a patch for 5.15-rt as well,
> or would you like me to do it?
>
> 5.16 and beyond does not have this issue.
>
> John Ogness
I guess the lclaudio@uudg.org is no longer valid. I need to update my
address book :-/
On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 12:31:28 -0400
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> Luis,
>
> Care to add this patch into the 5.10-rt stable?
>
> Thanks,
>
> -- Steve
>
> On Mon, 21 Mar 2022 10:36:55 +0106
> John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de> wrote:
>
> > On 2022-03-21, Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Update printk_seq for suppressed message.
> > >
> > > Affects 5.9-rt and 5.10-rt
> > >
> > > When message is suppressed, printk_seq should be updated, otherwise
> > > this message will be printed when reboot. This problem was introduced
> > > in commit 3edc0c85d154 ("printk: Rebase on top of new ring buffer").
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com>
> >
> > Reviewed-by: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
> >
> > Nice catch. Thanks.
> >
> > 5.15-rt also has this issue, although the fix is slightly different. For
> > 5.15-rt, writing to con->printk_seq (via latched_seq_write()) requires
> > the console locked. Would you like to post a patch for 5.15-rt as well,
> > or would you like me to do it?
> >
> > 5.16 and beyond does not have this issue.
> >
> > John Ogness
>
John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de> writes:
> On 2022-03-21, Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Update printk_seq for suppressed message.
>>
>> Affects 5.9-rt and 5.10-rt
>>
>> When message is suppressed, printk_seq should be updated, otherwise
>> this message will be printed when reboot. This problem was introduced
>> in commit 3edc0c85d154 ("printk: Rebase on top of new ring buffer").
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
>
> Nice catch. Thanks.
>
> 5.15-rt also has this issue, although the fix is slightly different. For
> 5.15-rt, writing to con->printk_seq (via latched_seq_write()) requires
> the console locked. Would you like to post a patch for 5.15-rt as well,
> or would you like me to do it?
>
I have upload a new patch for 5.15-rt, please review it too.
Message-Id: <20220321111501.68241-1-schspa@gmail.com>
> 5.16 and beyond does not have this issue.
>
> John Ogness
BRs
Schspa Shi
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.