drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>
As stated in [1], dma_set_mask() with a 64-bit mask will never fail if
dev->dma_mask is non-NULL.
So, if it fails, the 32 bits case will also fail for the same reason.
Simplify code and remove some dead code accordingly.
[1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/6/7/398
Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>
---
drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c
index e8b3ff2b9fbc..dff0b15a239d 100644
--- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c
+++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c
@@ -255,9 +255,6 @@ int vp_modern_probe(struct virtio_pci_modern_device *mdev)
}
err = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pci_dev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64));
- if (err)
- err = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pci_dev->dev,
- DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
if (err)
dev_warn(&pci_dev->dev, "Failed to enable 64-bit or 32-bit DMA. Trying to continue, but this might not work.\n");
--
2.25.1
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 8:59 AM <cgel.zte@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>
>
> As stated in [1], dma_set_mask() with a 64-bit mask will never fail if
> dev->dma_mask is non-NULL.
> So, if it fails, the 32 bits case will also fail for the same reason.
>
> Simplify code and remove some dead code accordingly.
>
> [1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/6/7/398
>
> Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>
> ---
> drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c | 3 ---
> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c
> index e8b3ff2b9fbc..dff0b15a239d 100644
> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c
> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c
> @@ -255,9 +255,6 @@ int vp_modern_probe(struct virtio_pci_modern_device *mdev)
> }
>
> err = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pci_dev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64));
> - if (err)
> - err = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pci_dev->dev,
> - DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
So we had:
if (!dev->dma_mask || !dma_supported(dev, mask))
return -EIO;
in dma_set_mask(), any reason dma_supported() can't be false here?
Thanks
> if (err)
> dev_warn(&pci_dev->dev, "Failed to enable 64-bit or 32-bit DMA. Trying to continue, but this might not work.\n");
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Typo in subj, and pls make subject match actual file name (_ not -). On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 12:58:58AM +0000, cgel.zte@gmail.com wrote: > From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn> > > As stated in [1], dma_set_mask() with a 64-bit mask will never fail if > dev->dma_mask is non-NULL. > So, if it fails, the 32 bits case will also fail for the same reason. > > Simplify code and remove some dead code accordingly. > > [1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/6/7/398 > > Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn> > Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn> > --- > drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c | 3 --- > 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c > index e8b3ff2b9fbc..dff0b15a239d 100644 > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c > @@ -255,9 +255,6 @@ int vp_modern_probe(struct virtio_pci_modern_device *mdev) > } > > err = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pci_dev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64)); > - if (err) > - err = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pci_dev->dev, > - DMA_BIT_MASK(32)); > if (err) > dev_warn(&pci_dev->dev, "Failed to enable 64-bit or 32-bit DMA. Trying to continue, but this might not work.\n"); > > -- > 2.25.1
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.