This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.107 release.
There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.

Responses should be made by Sat, 19 Mar 2022 12:45:16 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.107-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
and the diffstat can be found below.

thanks,

greg k-h

-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
    Linux 5.10.107-rc1

James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
    arm64: kvm: Fix copy-and-paste error in bhb templates for v5.10 stable

Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
    io_uring: return back safer resurrect

Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
    kselftest/vm: fix tests build with old libc

Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
    bnx2: Fix an error message

Niels Dossche <dossche.niels@gmail.com>
    sfc: extend the locking on mcdi->seqno

Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
    tcp: make tcp_read_sock() more robust

Sreeramya Soratkal <quic_ssramya@quicinc.com>
    nl80211: Update bss channel on channel switch for P2P_CLIENT

Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
    drm/vrr: Set VRR capable prop only if it is attached to connector

Golan Ben Ami <golan.ben.ami@intel.com>
    iwlwifi: don't advertise TWT support

Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
    atm: firestream: check the return value of ioremap() in fs_init()

Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
    can: rcar_canfd: rcar_canfd_channel_probe(): register the CAN device when fully ready

Julian Braha <julianbraha@gmail.com>
    ARM: 9178/1: fix unmet dependency on BITREVERSE for HAVE_ARCH_BITREVERSE

Alexander Lobakin <alobakin@pm.me>
    MIPS: smp: fill in sibling and core maps earlier

Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
    mac80211: refuse aggregations sessions before authorized

Corentin Labbe <clabbe@baylibre.com>
    ARM: dts: rockchip: fix a typo on rk3288 crypto-controller

Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
    ARM: dts: rockchip: reorder rk322x hmdi clocks

Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>
    arm64: dts: agilex: use the compatible "intel,socfpga-agilex-hsotg"

Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
    arm64: dts: rockchip: reorder rk3399 hdmi clocks

Jakob Unterwurzacher <jakob.unterwurzacher@theobroma-systems.com>
    arm64: dts: rockchip: fix rk3399-puma eMMC HS400 signal integrity

Yan Yan <evitayan@google.com>
    xfrm: Fix xfrm migrate issues when address family changes

Yan Yan <evitayan@google.com>
    xfrm: Check if_id in xfrm_migrate

Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
    sctp: fix the processing for INIT chunk

Kai Lueke <kailueke@linux.microsoft.com>
    Revert "xfrm: state and policy should fail if XFRMA_IF_ID 0"


-------------

Diffstat:

 Makefile                                           |  4 +-
 arch/arm/boot/dts/rk322x.dtsi                      |  4 +-
 arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi                      |  2 +-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/intel/socfpga_agilex.dtsi      |  4 +-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-puma.dtsi      |  6 ++
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi           |  6 +-
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/smccc_wa.S                      |  4 +-
 arch/mips/kernel/smp.c                             |  6 +-
 drivers/atm/firestream.c                           |  2 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_connector.c                    |  3 +
 drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c                  |  6 +-
 drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2.c               |  2 +-
 drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/mcdi.c                    |  2 +-
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/iwl-nvm-parse.c |  3 +-
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/mac80211.c  |  1 -
 fs/io_uring.c                                      | 18 ++++--
 include/net/xfrm.h                                 |  5 +-
 lib/Kconfig                                        |  1 -
 net/ipv4/tcp.c                                     | 10 +--
 net/key/af_key.c                                   |  2 +-
 net/mac80211/agg-tx.c                              | 10 ++-
 net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c                            | 71 ++++++++++++++--------
 net/wireless/nl80211.c                             |  3 +-
 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c                             | 14 +++--
 net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c                              | 15 +++--
 net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c                               | 27 +++-----
 tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c           |  1 +
 27 files changed, 141 insertions(+), 91 deletions(-)

On Thu, 17 Mar 2022 13:45:41 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.107 release.
> There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 19 Mar 2022 12:45:16 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.107-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 

5.10.107-rc1 Successfully Compiled and booted on my Raspberry PI 4b (8g) (bcm2711)
                
Tested-by: Fox Chen <foxhlchen@gmail.com>

Hi Greg,

On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 01:45:41PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.107 release.
> There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 19 Mar 2022 12:45:16 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

Build test:
mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20220301): 63 configs -> no new failure
arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20220301): 105 configs -> no new failure
arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220301): 3 configs -> no failure
x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220301): 4 configs -> no failure

Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]

[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/907
[2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/908


Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>

--
Regards
Sudip

On Thu, 17 Mar 2022 at 18:20, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.107 release.
> There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 19 Mar 2022 12:45:16 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.107-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>

## Build
* kernel: 5.10.107-rc1
* git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
* git branch: linux-5.10.y
* git commit: 0bacaadb448bb6e89b0d77369d3b7b7c09d8a776
* git describe: v5.10.106-24-g0bacaadb448b
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.106-24-g0bacaadb448b

## Test Regressions (compared to v5.10.106)
No test regressions found.

## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.10.106)
No metric regressions found.

## Test Fixes (compared to v5.10.106)
No test fixes found.

## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.10.106)
No metric fixes found.

## Test result summary
total: 99319, pass: 84014, fail: 873, skip: 13372, xfail: 1060

## Build Summary
* arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 291 total, 291 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 41 total, 41 passed, 0 failed
* dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 40 total, 40 passed, 0 failed
* juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 37 total, 37 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 60 total, 46 passed, 14 failed
* riscv: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 21 total, 21 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 41 total, 41 passed, 0 failed

## Test suites summary
* fwts
* igt-gpu-tools
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-bpf
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* linux-log-parser
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests
* ltp-commands-tests
* ltp-containers-tests
* ltp-controllers-tests
* ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
* ltp-crypto-tests
* ltp-cve-tests
* ltp-dio-tests
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
* ltp-filecaps-tests
* ltp-fs-tests
* ltp-fs_bind-tests
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
* ltp-fsx-tests
* ltp-hugetlb-tests
* ltp-io-tests
* ltp-ipc-tests
* ltp-math-tests
* ltp-mm-tests
* ltp-nptl-tests
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty-tests
* ltp-sched-tests
* ltp-securebits-tests
* ltp-syscalls-tests
* ltp-tracing-tests
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* perf
* perf/Zstd-perf.data-compression
* rcutorture
* ssuite
* v4l2-compliance
* vdso

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org

On 17/03/22 19.45, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.107 release.
> There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 

Successfully cross-compiled for arm64 (bcm2711_defconfig, gcc 10.2.0) and
powerpc (ps3_defconfig, gcc 11.2.0).

Tested-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara

On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 01:45:41PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.107 release.
> There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 19 Mar 2022 12:45:16 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 

Build results:
	total: 161 pass: 161 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
	total: 477 pass: 477 fail: 0

Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

Guenter

Hi!

> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.107 release.
> There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.


> Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
>     bnx2: Fix an error message

As commented during the AUTOSEL phase, this patch actually _adds_ an
error in at least 5.10 and older. Please drop.

Best regards,
								Pavel
-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany

On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 10:19:22PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.107 release.
> > There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> 
> 
> > Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
> >     bnx2: Fix an error message
> 
> As commented during the AUTOSEL phase, this patch actually _adds_ an
> error in at least 5.10 and older. Please drop.

Now dropped, thanks.

greg k-h

On 3/17/22 5:45 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.107 release.
> There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 19 Mar 2022 12:45:16 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.107-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels:

Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
-- 
Florian

Hi!

> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.107 release.
> There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.

CIP testing did not find any problems here:

https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5.10.y

Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de>

Best regards,
                                                                Pavel
-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany