The function devm_kzalloc() in rt5663_parse_dp() can fail, so its return
value should be checked.

Fixes: 457c25efc592 ("ASoC: rt5663: Add the function of impedance sensing")
Reported-by: TOTE Robot <oslab@tsinghua.edu.cn>
Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
---
 sound/soc/codecs/rt5663.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/rt5663.c b/sound/soc/codecs/rt5663.c
index 2138f62e6af5..3a8fba101b20 100644
--- a/sound/soc/codecs/rt5663.c
+++ b/sound/soc/codecs/rt5663.c
@@ -3478,6 +3478,8 @@ static int rt5663_parse_dp(struct rt5663_priv *rt5663, struct device *dev)
 		table_size = sizeof(struct impedance_mapping_table) *
 			rt5663->pdata.impedance_sensing_num;
 		rt5663->imp_table = devm_kzalloc(dev, table_size, GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (!rt5663->imp_table)
+			return -ENOMEM;
 		ret = device_property_read_u32_array(dev,
 			"realtek,impedance_sensing_table",
 			(u32 *)rt5663->imp_table, table_size);
-- 
2.17.1

On Fri, 25 Feb 2022 05:10:30 -0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> The function devm_kzalloc() in rt5663_parse_dp() can fail, so its return
> value should be checked.
> 
> 

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ALSA: rt5663: check the return value of devm_kzalloc() in rt5663_parse_dp()
      commit: 4d06f92f38b799295ae22c98be7a20cac3e2a1a7

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark