[PATCH] net: ksz884x: use time_before in netdev_open for compatibility

wudaemon posted 1 patch 4 years, 4 months ago
drivers/net/ethernet/micrel/ksz884x.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
[PATCH] net: ksz884x: use time_before in netdev_open for compatibility
Posted by wudaemon 4 years, 4 months ago
use time_before instead of direct compare for compatibility

Signed-off-by: wudaemon <wudaemon@163.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/micrel/ksz884x.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/micrel/ksz884x.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/micrel/ksz884x.c
index d024983815da..fd3cb9ce438f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/micrel/ksz884x.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/micrel/ksz884x.c
@@ -5428,7 +5428,7 @@ static int netdev_open(struct net_device *dev)
 		if (rc)
 			return rc;
 		for (i = 0; i < hw->mib_port_cnt; i++) {
-			if (next_jiffies < jiffies)
+			if (time_before(next_jiffies, jiffies))
 				next_jiffies = jiffies + HZ * 2;
 			else
 				next_jiffies += HZ * 1;
-- 
2.25.1

Re: [PATCH] net: ksz884x: use time_before in netdev_open for compatibility
Posted by Jakub Kicinski 4 years, 4 months ago
On Sun, 20 Feb 2022 12:21:01 +0000 wudaemon wrote:
> use time_before instead of direct compare for compatibility
> 
> Signed-off-by: wudaemon <wudaemon@163.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/micrel/ksz884x.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/micrel/ksz884x.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/micrel/ksz884x.c
> index d024983815da..fd3cb9ce438f 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/micrel/ksz884x.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/micrel/ksz884x.c
> @@ -5428,7 +5428,7 @@ static int netdev_open(struct net_device *dev)
>  		if (rc)
>  			return rc;
>  		for (i = 0; i < hw->mib_port_cnt; i++) {
> -			if (next_jiffies < jiffies)
> +			if (time_before(next_jiffies, jiffies))
>  				next_jiffies = jiffies + HZ * 2;
>  			else
>  				next_jiffies += HZ * 1;

I think this code is trying to space out the updates in time.
So neither way of doing the comparison seems great.
It'd be better to remove the static next_jiffies variable,
and just do something more akin to what mib_read_work() does
in open() as well.