Hi,

DTS patches are independent. Not tested, but I really hope no downstream kernel
depends on pwm node naming... If it does, please change it to compatible. :)

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Krzysztof Kozlowski (4):
  dt-bindings: pwm: google,cros-ec: include generic pwm schema
  arm64: dts: mt8183: align Google CROS EC PWM node name with dtschema
  arm64: dts: qcom: align Google CROS EC PWM node name with dtschema
  arm64: dts: rk3399: align Google CROS EC PWM node name with dtschema

 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/google,cros-ec.yaml    | 4 ++++
 .../devicetree/bindings/pwm/google,cros-ec-pwm.yaml          | 5 ++++-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183-kukui-jacuzzi.dtsi       | 2 +-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-trogdor.dtsi                 | 2 +-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-herobrine-herobrine-r0.dts   | 2 +-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-herobrine.dtsi               | 2 +-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp-ec-h1.dtsi               | 2 +-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-cheza.dtsi                   | 2 +-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-gru-chromebook.dtsi      | 2 +-
 9 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

-- 
2.32.0

Hello:

This series was applied to chrome-platform/linux.git (for-kernelci)
by Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>:

On Mon, 14 Feb 2022 09:19:12 +0100 you wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> DTS patches are independent. Not tested, but I really hope no downstream kernel
> depends on pwm node naming... If it does, please change it to compatible. :)
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [1/4] dt-bindings: pwm: google,cros-ec: include generic pwm schema
    https://git.kernel.org/chrome-platform/c/6b94ee669e8a
  - [2/4] arm64: dts: mt8183: align Google CROS EC PWM node name with dtschema
    (no matching commit)
  - [3/4] arm64: dts: qcom: align Google CROS EC PWM node name with dtschema
    https://git.kernel.org/chrome-platform/c/1e49defb8636
  - [4/4] arm64: dts: rk3399: align Google CROS EC PWM node name with dtschema
    https://git.kernel.org/chrome-platform/c/a0024f55eb5b

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html

Hello:

This series was applied to chrome-platform/linux.git (for-next)
by Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>:

On Mon, 14 Feb 2022 09:19:12 +0100 you wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> DTS patches are independent. Not tested, but I really hope no downstream kernel
> depends on pwm node naming... If it does, please change it to compatible. :)
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [1/4] dt-bindings: pwm: google,cros-ec: include generic pwm schema
    https://git.kernel.org/chrome-platform/c/6b94ee669e8a
  - [2/4] arm64: dts: mt8183: align Google CROS EC PWM node name with dtschema
    (no matching commit)
  - [3/4] arm64: dts: qcom: align Google CROS EC PWM node name with dtschema
    https://git.kernel.org/chrome-platform/c/1e49defb8636
  - [4/4] arm64: dts: rk3399: align Google CROS EC PWM node name with dtschema
    https://git.kernel.org/chrome-platform/c/a0024f55eb5b

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html

Am Montag, 4. April 2022, 19:14:21 CEST schrieb patchwork-bot+chrome-platform@kernel.org:
> Hello:
> 
> This series was applied to chrome-platform/linux.git (for-next)
> by Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>:

does someone know what goes on here?

I did apply only patch4 back in feburary and I definitly don't have any
access to a chrome-platform tree ;-)


Heiko

> On Mon, 14 Feb 2022 09:19:12 +0100 you wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > DTS patches are independent. Not tested, but I really hope no downstream kernel
> > depends on pwm node naming... If it does, please change it to compatible. :)
> > 
> > Best regards,
> > Krzysztof
> > 
> > [...]
> 
> Here is the summary with links:
>   - [1/4] dt-bindings: pwm: google,cros-ec: include generic pwm schema
>     https://git.kernel.org/chrome-platform/c/6b94ee669e8a
>   - [2/4] arm64: dts: mt8183: align Google CROS EC PWM node name with dtschema
>     (no matching commit)
>   - [3/4] arm64: dts: qcom: align Google CROS EC PWM node name with dtschema
>     https://git.kernel.org/chrome-platform/c/1e49defb8636
>   - [4/4] arm64: dts: rk3399: align Google CROS EC PWM node name with dtschema
>     https://git.kernel.org/chrome-platform/c/a0024f55eb5b
> 
> You are awesome, thank you!
>

Hi Heiko,

On Mon, Apr 04, 2022 at 07:16:03PM +0200, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Am Montag, 4. April 2022, 19:14:21 CEST schrieb patchwork-bot+chrome-platform@kernel.org:
> > Hello:
> > 
> > This series was applied to chrome-platform/linux.git (for-next)
> > by Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>:
> 
> does someone know what goes on here?
> 
> I did apply only patch4 back in feburary and I definitly don't have any
> access to a chrome-platform tree ;-)
> 

Sorry for the extra noise. It looks like patchwork-bot did this once I updated
chrome-platform's for-next branch to the newly created v5.18-rc1, which
contains this series now.

I'll look into quieting this in the future.

Benson

> 
> Heiko
> 
> > On Mon, 14 Feb 2022 09:19:12 +0100 you wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > DTS patches are independent. Not tested, but I really hope no downstream kernel
> > > depends on pwm node naming... If it does, please change it to compatible. :)
> > > 
> > > Best regards,
> > > Krzysztof
> > > 
> > > [...]
> > 
> > Here is the summary with links:
> >   - [1/4] dt-bindings: pwm: google,cros-ec: include generic pwm schema
> >     https://git.kernel.org/chrome-platform/c/6b94ee669e8a
> >   - [2/4] arm64: dts: mt8183: align Google CROS EC PWM node name with dtschema
> >     (no matching commit)
> >   - [3/4] arm64: dts: qcom: align Google CROS EC PWM node name with dtschema
> >     https://git.kernel.org/chrome-platform/c/1e49defb8636
> >   - [4/4] arm64: dts: rk3399: align Google CROS EC PWM node name with dtschema
> >     https://git.kernel.org/chrome-platform/c/a0024f55eb5b
> > 
> > You are awesome, thank you!
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Benson Leung
Staff Software Engineer
Chrome OS Kernel
Google Inc.
bleung@google.com
Chromium OS Project
bleung@chromium.org

On Mon, 14 Feb 2022 09:19:12 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> DTS patches are independent. Not tested, but I really hope no downstream kernel
> depends on pwm node naming... If it does, please change it to compatible. :)
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 
> Krzysztof Kozlowski (4):
>   dt-bindings: pwm: google,cros-ec: include generic pwm schema
>   arm64: dts: mt8183: align Google CROS EC PWM node name with dtschema
>   arm64: dts: qcom: align Google CROS EC PWM node name with dtschema
>   arm64: dts: rk3399: align Google CROS EC PWM node name with dtschema
> 
> [...]

Applied, thanks!

[4/4] arm64: dts: rk3399: align Google CROS EC PWM node name with dtschema
      commit: 474a84be692d893f45a54b405dcbc137cbf77949

Best regards,
-- 
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>

Hello,

On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 12:27:08AM +0100, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Feb 2022 09:19:12 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > DTS patches are independent. Not tested, but I really hope no downstream kernel
> > depends on pwm node naming... If it does, please change it to compatible. :)
> > 
> > Best regards,
> > Krzysztof
> > 
> > Krzysztof Kozlowski (4):
> >   dt-bindings: pwm: google,cros-ec: include generic pwm schema
> >   arm64: dts: mt8183: align Google CROS EC PWM node name with dtschema
> >   arm64: dts: qcom: align Google CROS EC PWM node name with dtschema
> >   arm64: dts: rk3399: align Google CROS EC PWM node name with dtschema
> > 
> > [...]
> 
> Applied, thanks!
> 
> [4/4] arm64: dts: rk3399: align Google CROS EC PWM node name with dtschema
>       commit: 474a84be692d893f45a54b405dcbc137cbf77949

I expected that all patches in this series go in together via an ARM
tree. Or are there expectations that this goes via PWM?

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

On 23/02/2022 07:22, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 12:27:08AM +0100, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
>> On Mon, 14 Feb 2022 09:19:12 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> DTS patches are independent. Not tested, but I really hope no downstream kernel
>>> depends on pwm node naming... If it does, please change it to compatible. :)
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Krzysztof
>>>
>>> Krzysztof Kozlowski (4):
>>>   dt-bindings: pwm: google,cros-ec: include generic pwm schema
>>>   arm64: dts: mt8183: align Google CROS EC PWM node name with dtschema
>>>   arm64: dts: qcom: align Google CROS EC PWM node name with dtschema
>>>   arm64: dts: rk3399: align Google CROS EC PWM node name with dtschema
>>>
>>> [...]
>>
>> Applied, thanks!
>>
>> [4/4] arm64: dts: rk3399: align Google CROS EC PWM node name with dtschema
>>       commit: 474a84be692d893f45a54b405dcbc137cbf77949
> 
> I expected that all patches in this series go in together via an ARM
> tree. Or are there expectations that this goes via PWM?

I would propose to pick individual patches by each maintainer. bindings
by PWM tree (Rob acked it) and DTS via each SoC tree.

Such approach gives flexibility, although `make dtbs_check` will spot
the new errors when run in PWM tree. Next will be fine, though.

Best regards,
Krzysztof