Makefile | 4 ++-- arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h | 2 ++ arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 2 ++ crypto/algapi.c | 1 + crypto/api.c | 1 - drivers/mmc/host/moxart-mmc.c | 2 +- fs/ksmbd/smb2pdu.c | 2 +- 7 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.23 release.
There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.23-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Linux 5.15.23-rc1
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
crypto: api - Move cryptomgr soft dependency into algapi
Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
ksmbd: fix SMB 3.11 posix extension mount failure
Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@linux.ibm.com>
KVM: s390: Return error on SIDA memop on normal guest
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
arm64: Add Cortex-A510 CPU part definition
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
moxart: fix potential use-after-free on remove path
-------------
Diffstat:
Makefile | 4 ++--
arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h | 2 ++
arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 2 ++
crypto/algapi.c | 1 +
crypto/api.c | 1 -
drivers/mmc/host/moxart-mmc.c | 2 +-
fs/ksmbd/smb2pdu.c | 2 +-
7 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
On Wed, Feb 9, 2022, at 2:14 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.23 release. > There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Compiled and booted 5.15.23-rc1 on my x86_64 test system successfully without errors or regressions. Tested-by: Slade Watkins <slade@sladewatkins.com> Thanks, Slade
On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 at 00:45, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.23 release. > There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.23-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org> ## Build * kernel: 5.15.23-rc1 * git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc * git branch: linux-5.15.y * git commit: 722769939d600370e0f75656c6076add1736919a * git describe: v5.15.21-118-g722769939d60 * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.15.y/build/v5.15.21-118-g722769939d60 ## Test Regressions (compared to v5.15.21-112-g0472630a5621) No test regressions found. ## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.15.21-112-g0472630a5621) No metric regressions found. ## Test Fixes (compared to v5.15.21-112-g0472630a5621) No test fixes found. ## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.15.21-112-g0472630a5621) No metric fixes found. ## Test result summary total: 87812, pass: 74191, fail: 495, skip: 10102, xfail: 824 ## Build Summary * arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed * arm: 259 total, 259 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 37 total, 37 passed, 0 failed * i386: 35 total, 35 passed, 0 failed * mips: 34 total, 34 passed, 0 failed * parisc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * powerpc: 52 total, 39 passed, 13 failed * riscv: 24 total, 20 passed, 4 failed * s390: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed * sh: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 37 total, 37 passed, 0 failed ## Test suites summary * fwts * igt-gpu-tools * kselftest-android * kselftest-arm64 * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_c_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_j_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_jc_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_none_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.nohint_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.paciasp_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_c_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_j_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_jc_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_none_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.nohint_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.paciasp_func * kselftest-breakpoints * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-drivers * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kunit * kvm-unit-tests * libgpiod * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * packetdrill * perf * rcutorture * ssuite * v4l2-compliance -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Hi Greg, On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 08:14:25PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.23 release. > There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test: mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 62 configs -> no new failure arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 100 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 3 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 4 configs -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] mips: Booted on ci20 board. No regression. [3] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/735 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/739 [3]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/743 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk> -- Regards Sudip
On 2/9/2022 11:14 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.23 release. > There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.23-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels: Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> -- Florian
On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 08:14:25PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.23 release. > There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > Build results: total: 156 pass: 156 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 488 pass: 488 fail: 0 Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Guenter
On 10/02/22 02.14, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.23 release. > There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > Successfully cross-compiled for arm64 (bcm2711_defconfig, gcc 10.2.0) and powerpc (ps3_defconfig, gcc 11.2.0). Tested-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com> -- An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
On Wed, 9 Feb 2022 20:14:25 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.23 release.
> There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.23-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
5.15.23-rc1 Successfully Compiled and booted on my Raspberry PI 4b (8g) (bcm2711)
Tested-by: Fox Chen <foxhlchen@gmail.com>
On 2/9/22 12:14 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.23 release. > There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.23-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h > Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions. Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> thanks, -- Shuah
On 2/9/22 11:14, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.23 release. > There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.23-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched). Tested-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.