Makefile | 4 ++-- arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 2 ++ crypto/algapi.c | 1 + crypto/api.c | 1 - drivers/mmc/host/moxart-mmc.c | 2 +- 5 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.100 release.
There are 3 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.100-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Linux 5.10.100-rc1
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
crypto: api - Move cryptomgr soft dependency into algapi
Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@linux.ibm.com>
KVM: s390: Return error on SIDA memop on normal guest
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
moxart: fix potential use-after-free on remove path
-------------
Diffstat:
Makefile | 4 ++--
arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 2 ++
crypto/algapi.c | 1 +
crypto/api.c | 1 -
drivers/mmc/host/moxart-mmc.c | 2 +-
5 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
On Wed, Feb 9, 2022, at 2:14 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.100 release. > There are 3 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Compiled and booted 5.10.100-rc1 on my x86_64 test system successfully without errors or regressions. Tested-by: Slade Watkins <slade@sladewatkins.com> Thanks, Slade
On 2/9/2022 11:14 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.100 release. > There are 3 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.100-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels: Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> -- Florian
On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 08:14:18PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.100 release. > There are 3 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > Build results: total: 161 pass: 161 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 477 pass: 477 fail: 0 Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Guenter
On 2022/2/10 3:14, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.100 release. > There are 3 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.100-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h > Tested on arm64 and x86 for 5.10.100-rc1, Kernel repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git Branch: linux-5.10.y Version: 5.10.100-rc1 Commit: f1b074cc52b4cb5f2f78985508ae344e6f066252 Compiler: gcc version 7.3.0 (GCC) arm64: -------------------------------------------------------------------- Testcase Result Summary: total: 9013 passed: 9013 failed: 0 timeout: 0 -------------------------------------------------------------------- x86: -------------------------------------------------------------------- Testcase Result Summary: total: 9013 passed: 9013 failed: 0 timeout: 0 -------------------------------------------------------------------- Tested-by: Hulk Robot <hulkrobot@huawei.com>
Hi!
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.100 release.
> There are 3 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
CIP testing did not find any new kernel problems here (but we still
hit the gmp.h compilation issue):
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5.10.y
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de>
Best regards,
Pavel
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
On 2/9/22 12:14 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.100 release. > There are 3 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.100-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h > Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions. Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> thanks, -- Shuah
On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 at 00:45, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.100 release. > There are 3 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.100-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org> ## Build * kernel: 5.10.100-rc1 * git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc * git branch: linux-5.10.y * git commit: f1b074cc52b4cb5f2f78985508ae344e6f066252 * git describe: v5.10.98-79-gf1b074cc52b4 * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.98-79-gf1b074cc52b4 ## Test Regressions (compared to v5.10.98-75-g9f5cb871ceb9) No test regressions found. ## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.10.98-75-g9f5cb871ceb9) No metric regressions found. ## Test Fixes (compared to v5.10.98-75-g9f5cb871ceb9) No test fixes found. ## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.10.98-75-g9f5cb871ceb9) No metric fixes found. ## Test result summary total: 76874, pass: 66765, fail: 223, skip: 9288, xfail: 598 ## Build Summary * arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed * arm: 259 total, 259 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 37 total, 37 passed, 0 failed * i386: 35 total, 35 passed, 0 failed * mips: 34 total, 34 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 25 total, 25 passed, 0 failed ## Test suites summary * fwts * igt-gpu-tools * kselftest-android * kselftest-arm64 * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_c_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_j_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_jc_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_none_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.nohint_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.paciasp_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_c_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_j_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_jc_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_none_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.nohint_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.paciasp_func * kselftest-breakpoints * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-drivers * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kunit * kvm-unit-tests * libgpiod * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * packetdrill * perf * rcutorture * ssuite * v4l2-compliance -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Hi Greg, On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 08:14:18PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.100 release. > There are 3 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test: mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 63 configs -> no new failure arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 105 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 3 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 4 configs -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/734 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/738 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk> -- Regards Sudip
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.