[REPOST PATCH v1 0/3] Add support for eDP PHY on SC7280 platform

Douglas Anderson posted 3 patches 4 years, 4 months ago
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,edp-phy.yaml | 4 +++-
drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-edp.c                     | 9 ++++++---
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
[REPOST PATCH v1 0/3] Add support for eDP PHY on SC7280 platform
Posted by Douglas Anderson 4 years, 4 months ago
This is a repost of the patch series that Sankeerth Billakanti posted
back in November. As Stephen pointed out [1] a few days ago, it wasn't
posted to the right place.

I've tested this and it seems to bring the eDP up on my sc7280 board,
so I'm re-posting it in the hopes that it can land soon-ish unless
there's something terribly wrong with it. ;-)

If it makes folks happier, I have no objections to Sankeerth's
original patches landing. These are the exact same thing but simply
with the addition of my Signed-off-by.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAE-0n50sONq+URcWwvDH=UPshgy6+XZEB3sK_4n+5jNktHsEhg@mail.gmail.com


Sankeerth Billakanti (3):
  dt-bindings: phy: Add eDP PHY compatible for sc7280
  phy: qcom: Add support for eDP PHY on sc7280
  phy: qcom: Program SSC only if supported by sink

 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,edp-phy.yaml | 4 +++-
 drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-edp.c                     | 9 ++++++---
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

-- 
2.35.0.263.gb82422642f-goog

Re: [REPOST PATCH v1 0/3] Add support for eDP PHY on SC7280 platform
Posted by Vinod Koul 4 years, 4 months ago
On 07-02-22, 16:17, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> This is a repost of the patch series that Sankeerth Billakanti posted
> back in November. As Stephen pointed out [1] a few days ago, it wasn't
> posted to the right place.
> 
> I've tested this and it seems to bring the eDP up on my sc7280 board,
> so I'm re-posting it in the hopes that it can land soon-ish unless
> there's something terribly wrong with it. ;-)
> 
> If it makes folks happier, I have no objections to Sankeerth's
> original patches landing. These are the exact same thing but simply
> with the addition of my Signed-off-by.
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAE-0n50sONq+URcWwvDH=UPshgy6+XZEB3sK_4n+5jNktHsEhg@mail.gmail.com

Applied all, thanks

-- 
~Vinod