[PATCH 5.4 00/10] 5.4.177-rc1 review

Greg Kroah-Hartman posted 10 patches 4 years, 4 months ago
Documentation/accounting/psi.rst         |  3 +-
Makefile                                 |  4 +-
drivers/net/ethernet/amd/xgbe/xgbe-drv.c | 14 ++++++-
drivers/net/usb/ipheth.c                 |  6 +--
drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c         |  7 ++--
include/linux/psi.h                      |  2 +-
include/linux/psi_types.h                |  3 --
kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c                | 14 +++++++
kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c                   | 11 ++++--
kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c                   |  3 +-
kernel/sched/psi.c                       | 66 ++++++++++++++------------------
net/core/rtnetlink.c                     |  6 ++-
net/packet/af_packet.c                   |  8 +++-
net/sched/cls_api.c                      | 11 ++++--
14 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
[PATCH 5.4 00/10] 5.4.177-rc1 review
Posted by Greg Kroah-Hartman 4 years, 4 months ago
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.177 release.
There are 10 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.

Responses should be made by Sun, 06 Feb 2022 09:19:05 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.177-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
and the diffstat can be found below.

thanks,

greg k-h

-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
    Linux 5.4.177-rc1

Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
    af_packet: fix data-race in packet_setsockopt / packet_setsockopt

Tianchen Ding <dtcccc@linux.alibaba.com>
    cpuset: Fix the bug that subpart_cpus updated wrongly in update_cpumask()

Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
    rtnetlink: make sure to refresh master_dev/m_ops in __rtnl_newlink()

Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
    net: sched: fix use-after-free in tc_new_tfilter()

Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
    net: amd-xgbe: Fix skb data length underflow

Raju Rangoju <Raju.Rangoju@amd.com>
    net: amd-xgbe: ensure to reset the tx_timer_active flag

Georgi Valkov <gvalkov@abv.bg>
    ipheth: fix EOVERFLOW in ipheth_rcvbulk_callback

Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
    cgroup-v1: Require capabilities to set release_agent

Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
    psi: Fix uaf issue when psi trigger is destroyed while being polled

Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
    PCI: pciehp: Fix infinite loop in IRQ handler upon power fault


-------------

Diffstat:

 Documentation/accounting/psi.rst         |  3 +-
 Makefile                                 |  4 +-
 drivers/net/ethernet/amd/xgbe/xgbe-drv.c | 14 ++++++-
 drivers/net/usb/ipheth.c                 |  6 +--
 drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c         |  7 ++--
 include/linux/psi.h                      |  2 +-
 include/linux/psi_types.h                |  3 --
 kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c                | 14 +++++++
 kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c                   | 11 ++++--
 kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c                   |  3 +-
 kernel/sched/psi.c                       | 66 ++++++++++++++------------------
 net/core/rtnetlink.c                     |  6 ++-
 net/packet/af_packet.c                   |  8 +++-
 net/sched/cls_api.c                      | 11 ++++--
 14 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)


Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/10] 5.4.177-rc1 review
Posted by Florian Fainelli 4 years, 4 months ago

On 2/4/2022 1:20 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.177 release.
> There are 10 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sun, 06 Feb 2022 09:19:05 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.177-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels:

Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
-- 
Florian
Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/10] 5.4.177-rc1 review
Posted by Guenter Roeck 4 years, 4 months ago
On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 10:20:13AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.177 release.
> There are 10 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sun, 06 Feb 2022 09:19:05 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 

Build results:
	total: 159 pass: 159 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
	total: 449 pass: 449 fail: 0

Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

Guenter
Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/10] 5.4.177-rc1 review
Posted by Slade Watkins 4 years, 4 months ago
On Fri, Feb 4, 2022, at 4:20 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.177 release.
> There are 10 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 06 Feb 2022 09:19:05 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

I was able to compile and boot on my x86_64 test system with no errors or regressions.

Tested-by: Slade Watkins <slade@sladewatkins.com>

Best,
Slade
Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/10] 5.4.177-rc1 review
Posted by Sudip Mukherjee 4 years, 4 months ago
Hi Greg,

On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 10:20:13AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.177 release.
> There are 10 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sun, 06 Feb 2022 09:19:05 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

Build test:
mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 65 configs -> no new failure
arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 107 configs -> no new failure
arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 2 configs -> no failure
x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 4 configs -> no failure

Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]

[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/709


Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>

--
Regards
Sudip

Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/10] 5.4.177-rc1 review
Posted by Naresh Kamboju 4 years, 4 months ago
On Fri, 4 Feb 2022 at 14:50, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.177 release.
> There are 10 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 06 Feb 2022 09:19:05 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.177-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>

## Build
* kernel: 5.4.177-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-5.4.y
* git commit: db9bfa6e8ef56c7c343bcb51031ea93db5f8d157
* git describe: v5.4.176-11-gdb9bfa6e8ef5
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.4.y/build/v5.4.176-11-gdb9bfa6e8ef5

## Test Regressions (compared to v5.4.176)
No test regressions found.

## Metric regressions (compared to v5.4.176)
No metric regressions found.

## Test fixes (compared to v5.4.176)
No test fixes found.

## Metric fixes (compared to v5.4.176)
No metric fixes found.

## Test result summary
total: 93678, pass: 78131, fail: 764, skip: 13342, xfail: 1441

## Build Summary
* arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 258 total, 258 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 24 total, 23 passed, 1 failed
* dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 20 total, 20 passed, 0 failed
* juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 34 total, 34 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 52 total, 48 passed, 4 failed
* riscv: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 36 total, 36 passed, 0 failed

## Test suites summary
* fwts
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-bpf
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* linux-log-parser
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests
* ltp-commands-tests
* ltp-containers-tests
* ltp-controllers-tests
* ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
* ltp-crypto-tests
* ltp-cve-tests
* ltp-dio-tests
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
* ltp-filecaps-tests
* ltp-fs-tests
* ltp-fs_bind-tests
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
* ltp-fsx-tests
* ltp-hugetlb-tests
* ltp-io-tests
* ltp-ipc-tests
* ltp-math-tests
* ltp-mm-tests
* ltp-nptl-tests
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty-tests
* ltp-sched-tests
* ltp-securebits-tests
* ltp-syscalls-tests
* ltp-tracing-tests
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* perf
* rcutorture
* ssuite
* v4l2-compliance

-- 
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/10] 5.4.177-rc1 review
Posted by Shuah Khan 4 years, 4 months ago
On 2/4/22 2:20 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.177 release.
> There are 10 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sun, 06 Feb 2022 09:19:05 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.177-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 

Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.

Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>

thanks,
-- Shuah