This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.16.4 release.
There are 9 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.

Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.16.4-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.16.y
and the diffstat can be found below.

thanks,

greg k-h

-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
    Linux 5.16.4-rc1

Russell King <russell.king@oracle.com>
    arm64/bpf: Remove 128MB limit for BPF JIT programs

Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
    select: Fix indefinitely sleeping task in poll_schedule_timeout()

Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
    rcu: Tighten rcu_advance_cbs_nowake() checks

Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
    memcg: better bounds on the memcg stats updates

Manish Chopra <manishc@marvell.com>
    bnx2x: Invalidate fastpath HSI version for VFs

Manish Chopra <manishc@marvell.com>
    bnx2x: Utilize firmware 7.13.21.0

Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
    io_uring: fix not released cached task refs

Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
    drm/amd/display: reset dcn31 SMU mailbox on failures

Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
    drm/i915: Flush TLBs before releasing backing store


-------------

Diffstat:

 Makefile                                           |   4 +-
 arch/arm64/include/asm/extable.h                   |   9 --
 arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h                    |   5 +-
 arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c                          |   2 +-
 arch/arm64/mm/ptdump.c                             |   2 -
 arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c                      |   7 +-
 .../drm/amd/display/dc/clk_mgr/dcn31/dcn31_smu.c   |   6 ++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object_types.h   |   1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c          |  10 ++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c                 | 102 +++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.h                 |   2 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_types.h           |   2 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h                    |  11 +++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c                    |   3 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c                |  26 +++++-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h                |   2 +
 drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x.h        |  11 ++-
 drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_cmn.c    |   6 +-
 .../net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_fw_defs.h    |   2 +
 drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_hsi.h    |   3 +-
 drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_main.c   |  75 ++++++++++-----
 drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_sriov.c  |  13 ++-
 fs/io_uring.c                                      |  34 ++++---
 fs/select.c                                        |  63 +++++++------
 kernel/rcu/tree.c                                  |   7 +-
 mm/memcontrol.c                                    |  20 ++--
 26 files changed, 318 insertions(+), 110 deletions(-)

On 1/27/22 11:09 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.16.4 release.
> There are 9 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.16.4-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.16.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 

Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.

Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>

thanks,
-- Shuah

On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 19:09:35 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.16.4 release.
> There are 9 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.16.4-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.16.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 

5.16.4-rc1 Successfully Compiled and booted on my Raspberry PI 4b (8g) (bcm2711)
                
Tested-by: Fox Chen <foxhlchen@gmail.com>

On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 07:09:35PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.16.4 release.
> There are 9 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 

Build results:
	total: 153 pass: 153 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
	total: 488 pass: 488 fail: 0

Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

Guenter

On 1/27/22 10:09, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.16.4 release.
> There are 9 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.16.4-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.16.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).

Tested-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>

On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 07:09:35PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.16.4 release.
> There are 9 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.

Hi Greg,

5.16.4-rc1 tested.

Run tested on:
- Allwinner H6 (Tanix TX6)
- Intel Tiger Lake x86_64 (nuc11 i7-1165G7)

In addition: build tested on:
- Allwinner A64
- Allwinner H3
- Allwinner H5
- NXP iMX6
- NXP iMX8
- Qualcomm Dragonboard
- Rockchip RK3288
- Rockchip RK3328
- Rockchip RK3399pro
- Samsung Exynos

Tested-by: Rudi Heitbaum <rudi@heitbaum.com>
--
Rudi

On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 at 23:41, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.16.4 release.
> There are 9 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.16.4-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.16.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>

## Build
* kernel: 5.16.4-rc1
* git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
* git branch: linux-5.16.y
* git commit: b894c0fc760c5712fe86926a234e7ccbe4dfead8
* git describe: v5.16.3-10-gb894c0fc760c
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.16.y/build/v5.16.3-10-gb894c0fc760c

## Test Regressions (compared to v5.16.2-1034-g39cb7e05eaf4)
No test regressions found.

## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.16.2-1034-g39cb7e05eaf4)
No metric regressions found.

## Test Fixes (compared to v5.16.2-1034-g39cb7e05eaf4)
No test fixes found.

## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.16.2-1034-g39cb7e05eaf4)
No metric fixes found.

## Test result summary
total: 107251, pass: 90933, fail: 1502, skip: 13763, xfail: 1053

## Build Summary
* arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 263 total, 261 passed, 2 failed
* arm64: 42 total, 42 passed, 0 failed
* dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 40 total, 37 passed, 3 failed
* juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 37 total, 35 passed, 2 failed
* parisc: 14 total, 14 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 56 total, 50 passed, 6 failed
* riscv: 28 total, 24 passed, 4 failed
* s390: 22 total, 20 passed, 2 failed
* sh: 26 total, 24 passed, 2 failed
* sparc: 14 total, 14 passed, 0 failed
* x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 42 total, 42 passed, 0 failed

## Test suites summary
* fwts
* igt-gpu-tools
* kselftest-
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_c_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_j_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_jc_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_none_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.nohint_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.paciasp_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_c_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_j_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_jc_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_none_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.nohint_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.paciasp_func
* kselftest-bpf
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-lkdtm
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* linux-log-parser
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests
* ltp-commands-tests
* ltp-containers-tests
* ltp-controllers-tests
* ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
* ltp-crypto-tests
* ltp-cve-tests
* ltp-dio-tests
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
* ltp-filecaps-tests
* ltp-fs-tests
* ltp-fs_bind-tests
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
* ltp-fsx-tests
* ltp-hugetlb-tests
* ltp-io-tests
* ltp-ipc-tests
* ltp-math-tests
* ltp-mm-tests
* ltp-nptl-tests
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty-tests
* ltp-sched-tests
* ltp-securebits-tests
* ltp-syscalls-tests
* ltp-tracing-tests
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* perf
* prep-inline
* rcutorture
* ssuite
* v4l2-compliance

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org

On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 12:13 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.16.4 release.
> There are 9 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.16.4-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.16.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Hi Greg,

Compiled and booted on my test system Lenovo P50s: Intel Core i7
No emergency and critical messages in the dmesg

./perf bench sched all
# Running sched/messaging benchmark...
# 20 sender and receiver processes per group
# 10 groups == 400 processes run

     Total time: 0.441 [sec]

# Running sched/pipe benchmark...
# Executed 1000000 pipe operations between two processes

     Total time: 7.131 [sec]

       7.131623 usecs/op
         140220 ops/sec

Tested-by: Zan Aziz <zanaziz313@gmail.com>

Thanks
-Zan

On 1/27/2022 10:09 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.16.4 release.
> There are 9 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.16.4-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.16.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels:

Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
-- 
Florian