[PATCH 5.4 00/11] 5.4.175-rc1 review

Greg Kroah-Hartman posted 11 patches 4 years, 5 months ago
Makefile                                         |   4 +-
arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm283x.dtsi                   |   1 +
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object_types.h |   3 +
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c        |  10 ++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c               |  99 +++++++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.h               |   2 +
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_types.h         |   2 +
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h                  |  11 ++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c                  |   4 +
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c               |   3 +-
drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-bcm2835.c            | 209 +++++++++++++++++++----
fs/select.c                                      |  63 +++----
kernel/rcu/tree.c                                |   7 +-
13 files changed, 346 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)
[PATCH 5.4 00/11] 5.4.175-rc1 review
Posted by Greg Kroah-Hartman 4 years, 5 months ago
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.175 release.
There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.

Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.175-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
and the diffstat can be found below.

thanks,

greg k-h

-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
    Linux 5.4.175-rc1

Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
    select: Fix indefinitely sleeping task in poll_schedule_timeout()

Tim Harvey <tharvey@gateworks.com>
    mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: disable CMDQ support

Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.com>
    ARM: dts: gpio-ranges property is now required

Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.com>
    pinctrl: bcm2835: Change init order for gpio hogs

Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
    pinctrl: bcm2835: Add support for wake-up interrupts

Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
    pinctrl: bcm2835: Match BCM7211 compatible string

Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com>
    pinctrl: bcm2835: Add support for all GPIOs on BCM2711

Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com>
    pinctrl: bcm2835: Refactor platform data

Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com>
    pinctrl: bcm2835: Drop unused define

Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
    rcu: Tighten rcu_advance_cbs_nowake() checks

Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
    drm/i915: Flush TLBs before releasing backing store


-------------

Diffstat:

 Makefile                                         |   4 +-
 arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm283x.dtsi                   |   1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object_types.h |   3 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c        |  10 ++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c               |  99 +++++++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.h               |   2 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_types.h         |   2 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h                  |  11 ++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c                  |   4 +
 drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c               |   3 +-
 drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-bcm2835.c            | 209 +++++++++++++++++++----
 fs/select.c                                      |  63 +++----
 kernel/rcu/tree.c                                |   7 +-
 13 files changed, 346 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)


Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/11] 5.4.175-rc1 review
Posted by Florian Fainelli 4 years, 5 months ago

On 1/27/2022 10:09 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.175 release.
> There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.175-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels:

Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
-- 
Florian
Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/11] 5.4.175-rc1 review
Posted by Guenter Roeck 4 years, 5 months ago
On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 07:09:01PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.175 release.
> There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 

Build results:
	total: 157 pass: 157 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
	total: 449 pass: 449 fail: 0

Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

Guenter
Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/11] 5.4.175-rc1 review
Posted by Sudip Mukherjee 4 years, 5 months ago
Hi Greg,

On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 07:09:01PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.175 release.
> There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

Build test:
mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 65 configs -> no new failure
arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 107 configs -> no new failure
arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 2 configs -> no failure
x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 4 configs -> no failure

Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]

[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/665


Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>

--
Regards
Sudip

Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/11] 5.4.175-rc1 review
Posted by Naresh Kamboju 4 years, 5 months ago
On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 at 23:40, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.175 release.
> There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.175-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>

## Build
* kernel: 5.4.175-rc1
* git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
* git branch: linux-5.4.y
* git commit: aa3124a3444fd7cfa588271ffdc7d3cb77131142
* git describe: v5.4.174-12-gaa3124a3444f
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.4.y/build/v5.4.174-12-gaa3124a3444f

## Test Regressions (compared to v5.4.173-317-gb9fb58c8fa63)
No test regressions found.

## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.4.173-317-gb9fb58c8fa63)
No metric regressions found.

## Test Fixes (compared to v5.4.173-317-gb9fb58c8fa63)
No test fixes found.

## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.4.173-317-gb9fb58c8fa63)
No metric fixes found.

## Test result summary
total: 60336, pass: 50071, fail: 423, skip: 9268, xfail: 574

## Build Summary
* arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 258 total, 258 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 36 total, 31 passed, 5 failed
* dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 20 total, 20 passed, 0 failed
* juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 34 total, 34 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 52 total, 48 passed, 4 failed
* riscv: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 36 total, 36 passed, 0 failed

## Test suites summary
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_c_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_j_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_jc_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_none_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.nohint_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.paciasp_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_c_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_j_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_jc_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_none_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.nohint_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.paciasp_func
* kselftest-bpf
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* linux-log-parser
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests
* ltp-commands-tests
* ltp-containers-tests
* ltp-controllers-tests
* ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
* ltp-crypto-tests
* ltp-cve-tests
* ltp-dio-tests
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
* ltp-filecaps-tests
* ltp-fs-tests
* ltp-fs_bind-tests
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
* ltp-fsx-tests
* ltp-hugetlb-tests
* ltp-io-tests
* ltp-ipc-tests
* ltp-math-tests
* ltp-mm-tests
* ltp-nptl-tests
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty-tests
* ltp-sched-tests
* ltp-securebits-tests
* ltp-syscalls-tests
* ltp-tracing-tests
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* perf
* perf/Zstd-perf.data-compression
* rcutorture
* ssuite
* v4l2-compliance

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/11] 5.4.175-rc1 review
Posted by Shuah Khan 4 years, 5 months ago
On 1/27/22 11:09 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.175 release.
> There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.175-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 

Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.

Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>

thanks,
-- Shuah