Makefile | 4 +- arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 6 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object_types.h | 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c | 10 ++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c | 102 +++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.h | 2 + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_types.h | 2 + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 11 +++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c | 3 + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c | 26 +++++- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h | 2 + drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x.h | 11 ++- drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_cmn.c | 6 +- .../net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_fw_defs.h | 2 + drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_hsi.h | 3 +- drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_main.c | 75 ++++++++++----- drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_sriov.c | 13 ++- fs/select.c | 63 +++++++------ kernel/rcu/tree.c | 7 +- 19 files changed, 277 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.95 release.
There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.95-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Linux 5.10.95-rc1
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
select: Fix indefinitely sleeping task in poll_schedule_timeout()
David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
KVM: x86/mmu: Fix write-protection of PTs mapped by the TDP MMU
Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
rcu: Tighten rcu_advance_cbs_nowake() checks
Manish Chopra <manishc@marvell.com>
bnx2x: Invalidate fastpath HSI version for VFs
Manish Chopra <manishc@marvell.com>
bnx2x: Utilize firmware 7.13.21.0
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
drm/i915: Flush TLBs before releasing backing store
-------------
Diffstat:
Makefile | 4 +-
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 6 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object_types.h | 1 +
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c | 10 ++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c | 102 +++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.h | 2 +
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_types.h | 2 +
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 11 +++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c | 3 +
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c | 26 +++++-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h | 2 +
drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x.h | 11 ++-
drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_cmn.c | 6 +-
.../net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_fw_defs.h | 2 +
drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_hsi.h | 3 +-
drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_main.c | 75 ++++++++++-----
drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_sriov.c | 13 ++-
fs/select.c | 63 +++++++------
kernel/rcu/tree.c | 7 +-
19 files changed, 277 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)
On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 19:09:16 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.95 release.
> There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.95-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
5.10.95-rc1 Successfully Compiled and booted on my Raspberry PI 4b (8g) (bcm2711)
Tested-by: Fox Chen <foxhlchen@gmail.com>
Hi!
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.95 release.
> There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
CIP testing did not find any new kernel problems here (but we still
hit the gmp.h compilation issue):
CIP testing did not find any problems here:
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5.10.y
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de>
Best regards,
Pavel
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
On 1/27/2022 10:09 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.95 release. > There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.95-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels: Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> -- Florian
On 1/27/22 11:09 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.95 release. > There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.95-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h > Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions. Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> thanks, -- Shuah
On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 at 23:40, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.95 release. > There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.95-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org> ## Build * kernel: 5.10.95-rc1 * git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git * git branch: linux-5.10.y * git commit: a2441d7f51b176a085cf4ea62e1071ffb4dfcf2c * git describe: v5.10.94-7-ga2441d7f51b1 * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.94-7-ga2441d7f51b1 ## Test Regressions (compared to v5.10.93-561-gf32eb088b139) No test regressions found. ## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.10.93-561-gf32eb088b139) No metric regressions found. ## Test Fixes (compared to v5.10.93-561-gf32eb088b139) No test fixes found. ## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.10.93-561-gf32eb088b139) No metric fixes found. ## Test result summary total: 84455, pass: 72139, fail: 461, skip: 11140, xfail: 715 ## Build Summary * arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed * arm: 259 total, 259 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 37 total, 37 passed, 0 failed * dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * i386: 36 total, 36 passed, 0 failed * juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * mips: 34 total, 34 passed, 0 failed * parisc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * powerpc: 52 total, 46 passed, 6 failed * riscv: 24 total, 22 passed, 2 failed * s390: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed * sh: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 37 total, 37 passed, 0 failed ## Test suites summary * fwts * igt-gpu-tools * kselftest-android * kselftest-arm64 * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_c_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_j_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_jc_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_none_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.nohint_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.paciasp_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_c_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_j_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_jc_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_none_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.nohint_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.paciasp_func * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-breakpoints * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-drivers * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kunit * kvm-unit-tests * libgpiod * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * packetdrill * perf * rcutorture * ssuite * v4l2-compliance -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Hi Greg, On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 07:09:16PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.95 release. > There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test: mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 63 configs -> no new failure arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 105 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 3 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 4 configs -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/666 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/670 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk> -- Regards Sudip
On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 07:09:16PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.95 release. > There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > Build results: total: 159 pass: 159 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 477 pass: 477 fail: 0 Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Guenter
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.