This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.227 release.
There are 3 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.

Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.19.227-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.19.y
and the diffstat can be found below.

thanks,

greg k-h

-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
    Linux 4.19.227-rc1

Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
    select: Fix indefinitely sleeping task in poll_schedule_timeout()

Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com>
    net: bridge: clear bridge's private skb space on xmit

Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
    drm/i915: Flush TLBs before releasing backing store


-------------

Diffstat:

 Makefile                               |  4 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h        |  2 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c        | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_object.h |  1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h        |  6 +++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c        |  4 ++
 fs/select.c                            | 63 ++++++++++++++------------
 net/bridge/br_device.c                 |  2 +
 8 files changed, 133 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)

On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 at 23:39, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.227 release.
> There are 3 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.19.227-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.19.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h


Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>

## Build
* kernel: 4.19.227-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-4.19.y
* git commit: 0f7abe705832c477bd2571c77981ca3034202ace
* git describe: v4.19.226-4-g0f7abe705832
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-4.19.y/build/v4.19.226-4-g0f7abe705832

## Test Regressions (compared to v4.19.225-239-gcedebae149c2)
No test regressions found.

## Metric Regressions (compared to v4.19.225-239-gcedebae149c2)
No metric regressions found.

## Test Fixes (compared to v4.19.225-239-gcedebae149c2)
No test fixes found.

## Metric Fixes (compared to v4.19.225-239-gcedebae149c2)
No metric fixes found.

## Test result summary
total: 78421, pass: 63758, fail: 737, skip: 12182, xfail: 1744

## Build Summary
* arm: 250 total, 246 passed, 4 failed
* arm64: 35 total, 35 passed, 0 failed
* dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 19 total, 19 passed, 0 failed
* juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 26 total, 26 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 52 total, 48 passed, 4 failed
* s390: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 34 total, 34 passed, 0 failed

## Test suites summary
* fwts
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_c_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_j_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_jc_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_none_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.nohint_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.paciasp_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_c_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_j_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_jc_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_none_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.nohint_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.paciasp_func
* kselftest-bpf
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kvm-unit-tests
* libhugetlbfs
* linux-log-parser
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests
* ltp-commands-tests
* ltp-containers-tests
* ltp-controllers-tests
* ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
* ltp-crypto-tests
* ltp-cve-tests
* ltp-dio-tests
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
* ltp-filecaps-tests
* ltp-fs-tests
* ltp-fs_bind-tests
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
* ltp-fsx-tests
* ltp-hugetlb-tests
* ltp-io-tests
* ltp-ipc-tests
* ltp-math-tests
* ltp-mm-tests
* ltp-nptl-tests
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty-tests
* ltp-sched-tests
* ltp-securebits-tests
* ltp-syscalls-tests
* ltp-tracing-tests
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* perf
* rcutorture
* ssuite
* v4l2-compliance

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org

On 1/27/22 11:09 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.227 release.
> There are 3 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.19.227-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.19.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 

Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.

Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>

thanks,
-- Shuah

Hi Greg,

On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 07:09:00PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.227 release.
> There are 3 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

Build test:
mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 63 configs -> no failure
arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 116 configs -> no new failure
arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 2 configs -> no failure
x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 4 configs -> no failure

Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]

[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/664


Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>

--
Regards
Sudip

On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 07:09:00PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.227 release.
> There are 3 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 

Build results:
	total: 155 pass: 155 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
	total: 425 pass: 425 fail: 0

Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

Guenter

Hi!

> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.227 release.
> There are 3 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.

CIP testing did not find any problems here:

https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-4.19.y

Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de>

Best regards,
                                                                Pavel
-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany