[PATCH 4.4 0/1] 4.4.301-rc1 review

Greg Kroah-Hartman posted 1 patch 4 years, 5 months ago
Makefile                            |  4 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h     |  5 +++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c     | 89 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c |  3 ++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h     |  6 +++
5 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
[PATCH 4.4 0/1] 4.4.301-rc1 review
Posted by Greg Kroah-Hartman 4 years, 5 months ago
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.301 release.
There are 1 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.

Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.4.301-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.4.y
and the diffstat can be found below.

thanks,

greg k-h

-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
    Linux 4.4.301-rc1

Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
    drm/i915: Flush TLBs before releasing backing store


-------------

Diffstat:

 Makefile                            |  4 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h     |  5 +++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c     | 89 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c |  3 ++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h     |  6 +++
 5 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)


Re: [PATCH 4.4 0/1] 4.4.301-rc1 review
Posted by Pavel Machek 4 years, 5 months ago
Hi!

> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.301 release.
> There are 1 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.

CIP testing did not find any problems here:

https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-4.4.y

Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de>

Best regards,
                                                                Pavel

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Re: [PATCH 4.4 0/1] 4.4.301-rc1 review
Posted by Shuah Khan 4 years, 5 months ago
On 1/27/22 11:08 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.301 release.
> There are 1 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.4.301-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.

Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>

thanks,
-- Shuah
Re: [PATCH 4.4 0/1] 4.4.301-rc1 review
Posted by Guenter Roeck 4 years, 5 months ago
On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 07:08:13PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.301 release.
> There are 1 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 

Build results:
	total: 160 pass: 160 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
	total: 342 pass: 342 fail: 0

Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

Guenter
Re: [PATCH 4.4 0/1] 4.4.301-rc1 review
Posted by Naresh Kamboju 4 years, 5 months ago
On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 at 23:38, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.301 release.
> There are 1 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.4.301-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>

## Build
* kernel: 4.4.301-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-4.4.y
* git commit: 187d7c3b8ca09131c71f6dbb8c8761f7f809402c
* git describe: v4.4.300-2-g187d7c3b8ca0
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-4.4.y/build/v4.4.300-2-g187d7c3b8ca0

## Test Regressions (compared to v4.4.299-114-g67ca9c44f63d)
No test regressions found.

## Metric Regressions (compared to v4.4.299-114-g67ca9c44f63d)
No metric regressions found.

## Test Fixes (compared to v4.4.299-114-g67ca9c44f63d)
No test fixes found.

## Metric Fixes (compared to v4.4.299-114-g67ca9c44f63d)
No metric fixes found.

## Test result summary
total: 33090, pass: 26341, fail: 104, skip: 5946, xfail: 699

## Build Summary
* arm: 129 total, 129 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 31 total, 31 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed
* juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 22 total, 22 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 30 total, 24 passed, 6 failed

## Test suites summary
* kselftest-bpf
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-zram
* libhugetlbfs
* linux-log-parser
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests
* ltp-commands-tests
* ltp-containers-tests
* ltp-controllers-tests
* ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
* ltp-crypto-tests
* ltp-cve-tests
* ltp-dio-tests
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
* ltp-filecaps-tests
* ltp-fs-tests
* ltp-fs_bind-tests
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
* ltp-fsx-tests
* ltp-hugetlb-tests
* ltp-io-tests
* ltp-ipc-tests
* ltp-math-tests
* ltp-mm-tests
* ltp-nptl-tests
* ltp-pty-tests
* ltp-sched-tests
* ltp-securebits-tests
* ltp-syscalls-tests
* ltp-tracing-tests
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* perf
* v4l2-compliance

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org