x86 boards may use ACPI HID "IFX3100" for dps310 device.

Vendor told us feel free to add the ID and contact
"Saumitra.Chafekar@infineon.com" for any further question.

So add an ACPI match table for that accordingly.

Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
---
v2:
 - Drop ACPI_PTR().
 - Add info from vendor.

 drivers/iio/pressure/dps310.c | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/iio/pressure/dps310.c b/drivers/iio/pressure/dps310.c
index 0730380ceb692..7e6fcb32212a2 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/pressure/dps310.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/pressure/dps310.c
@@ -812,9 +812,17 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id dps310_id[] = {
 };
 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, dps310_id);
 
+static const struct acpi_device_id dps310_acpi_match[] = {
+	{ "IFX3100" },
+	{ },
+};
+
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, dps310_acpi_match);
+
 static struct i2c_driver dps310_driver = {
 	.driver = {
 		.name = DPS310_DEV_NAME,
+		.acpi_match_table = dps310_acpi_match,
 	},
 	.probe = dps310_probe,
 	.id_table = dps310_id,
-- 
2.33.1

On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 4:38 PM Kai-Heng Feng
<kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> wrote:
>
> x86 boards may use ACPI HID "IFX3100" for dps310 device.

the dps310

> Vendor told us feel free to add the ID and contact
> "Saumitra.Chafekar@infineon.com" for any further question.

questions

> So add an ACPI match table for that accordingly.

I have checked the official PNP registry and may confirm IFX is for
Infineon, since they are aware
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>

Thanks for all your efforts, appreciate it!

> Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
> ---
> v2:
>  - Drop ACPI_PTR().
>  - Add info from vendor.
>
>  drivers/iio/pressure/dps310.c | 8 ++++++++
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/pressure/dps310.c b/drivers/iio/pressure/dps310.c
> index 0730380ceb692..7e6fcb32212a2 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/pressure/dps310.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/pressure/dps310.c
> @@ -812,9 +812,17 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id dps310_id[] = {
>  };
>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, dps310_id);
>
> +static const struct acpi_device_id dps310_acpi_match[] = {
> +       { "IFX3100" },
> +       { },
> +};

> +

This is redundant, I hope Jonathan may remove it when applying.

> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, dps310_acpi_match);
> +
>  static struct i2c_driver dps310_driver = {
>         .driver = {
>                 .name = DPS310_DEV_NAME,
> +               .acpi_match_table = dps310_acpi_match,
>         },
>         .probe = dps310_probe,
>         .id_table = dps310_id,
> --
> 2.33.1
>


-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 6:22 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 4:38 PM Kai-Heng Feng
> <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> wrote:

...

> > +static const struct acpi_device_id dps310_acpi_match[] = {
> > +       { "IFX3100" },

> > +       { },

And no comma needed here.

> > +};
>
> > +
>
> This is redundant, I hope Jonathan may remove it when applying.
>
> > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, dps310_acpi_match);

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko