This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.93 release.
There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.

Responses should be made by Thu, 20 Jan 2022 16:04:42 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.93-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
and the diffstat can be found below.

thanks,

greg k-h

-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
    Linux 5.10.93-rc1

Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
    mtd: fixup CFI on ixp4xx

Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
    powerpc/pseries: Get entry and uaccess flush required bits from H_GET_CPU_CHARACTERISTICS

Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
    ALSA: hda/realtek: Re-order quirk entries for Lenovo

Baole Fang <fbl718@163.com>
    ALSA: hda/realtek: Add quirk for Legion Y9000X 2020

Bart Kroon <bart@tarmack.eu>
    ALSA: hda: ALC287: Add Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 9i 14ITL5 speaker quirk

Christian Lachner <gladiac@gmail.com>
    ALSA: hda/realtek - Fix silent output on Gigabyte X570 Aorus Master after reboot from Windows

Arie Geiger <arsgeiger@gmail.com>
    ALSA: hda/realtek: Add speaker fixup for some Yoga 15ITL5 devices

Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@intel.com>
    KVM: x86: remove PMU FIXED_CTR3 from msrs_to_save_all

Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
    firmware: qemu_fw_cfg: fix kobject leak in probe error path

Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
    firmware: qemu_fw_cfg: fix NULL-pointer deref on duplicate entries

Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
    firmware: qemu_fw_cfg: fix sysfs information leak

Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
    rtlwifi: rtl8192cu: Fix WARNING when calling local_irq_restore() with interrupts enabled

Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
    media: uvcvideo: fix division by zero at stream start

Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
    video: vga16fb: Only probe for EGA and VGA 16 color graphic cards

Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
    9p: only copy valid iattrs in 9P2000.L setattr implementation

Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
    KVM: s390: Clarify SIGP orders versus STOP/RESTART

Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
    KVM: x86: Register Processor Trace interrupt hook iff PT enabled in guest

Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
    perf: Protect perf_guest_cbs with RCU

Jamie Hill-Daniel <jamie@hill-daniel.co.uk>
    vfs: fs_context: fix up param length parsing in legacy_parse_param

Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
    remoteproc: qcom: pil_info: Don't memcpy_toio more than is provided

Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
    orangefs: Fix the size of a memory allocation in orangefs_bufmap_alloc()

NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
    devtmpfs regression fix: reconfigure on each mount

Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
    kbuild: Add $(KBUILD_HOSTLDFLAGS) to 'has_libelf' test


-------------

Diffstat:

 Makefile                                           |  6 +--
 arch/arm/kernel/perf_callchain.c                   | 17 +++++---
 arch/arm64/kernel/perf_callchain.c                 | 18 +++++---
 arch/csky/kernel/perf_callchain.c                  |  6 ++-
 arch/nds32/kernel/perf_event_cpu.c                 | 17 +++++---
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/hvcall.h                  |  2 +
 arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c             |  6 +++
 arch/riscv/kernel/perf_callchain.c                 |  7 ++-
 arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c                          |  7 +++
 arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c                           |  9 +++-
 arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h                           |  1 +
 arch/s390/kvm/sigp.c                               | 28 ++++++++++++
 arch/x86/events/core.c                             | 17 +++++---
 arch/x86/events/intel/core.c                       |  9 ++--
 arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h                    |  1 +
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c                             |  1 +
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c                                 |  7 ++-
 drivers/base/devtmpfs.c                            |  7 +++
 drivers/firmware/qemu_fw_cfg.c                     | 20 ++++-----
 drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_video.c                  |  4 ++
 drivers/mtd/chips/Kconfig                          |  2 +
 drivers/mtd/maps/Kconfig                           |  2 +-
 .../net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192cu/hw.c    |  1 +
 drivers/remoteproc/qcom_pil_info.c                 |  2 +-
 drivers/video/fbdev/vga16fb.c                      | 24 ++++++++++
 fs/9p/vfs_inode_dotl.c                             | 29 ++++++++----
 fs/fs_context.c                                    |  2 +-
 fs/orangefs/orangefs-bufmap.c                      |  7 ++-
 fs/super.c                                         |  4 +-
 include/linux/fs_context.h                         |  2 +
 include/linux/perf_event.h                         | 13 +++++-
 kernel/events/core.c                               | 13 ++++--
 sound/pci/hda/patch_realtek.c                      | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++--
 33 files changed, 267 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-)

On 1/18/22 8:05 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.93 release.
> There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Thu, 20 Jan 2022 16:04:42 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.93-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels:

Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
-- 
Florian

Hi Greg,

On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 3:05 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.93 release.
> There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 20 Jan 2022 16:04:42 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

gmail says you have sent this mail on "Jan 20, 2022 at 3:05 PM" but
https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20220118160451.233828401@linuxfoundation.org/
says you have sent it on "18 Jan 2022 17:05:40". :(
Is it possible to add my email on the Cc list for the stable review
mails please..

-- 
Regards
Sudip

On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 03:02:43PM +0000, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 3:05 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.93 release.
> > There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Thu, 20 Jan 2022 16:04:42 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> gmail says you have sent this mail on "Jan 20, 2022 at 3:05 PM" but
> https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20220118160451.233828401@linuxfoundation.org/
> says you have sent it on "18 Jan 2022 17:05:40". :(

gmail does not like vger.kernel.org, sorry.

> Is it possible to add my email on the Cc list for the stable review
> mails please..

Now added!

greg k-h

On 2022/1/19 0:05, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.93 release.
> There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Thu, 20 Jan 2022 16:04:42 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.93-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 

Tested on arm64 and x86 for 5.10.93-rc1,

Kernel repo:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
Branch: linux-5.10.y
Version: 5.10.93-rc1
Commit: e0476c04ea8991e23850dab84ce56ab557c56986
Compiler: gcc version 7.3.0 (GCC)

arm64:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Testcase Result Summary:
total: 9018
passed: 9018
failed: 0
timeout: 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------

x86:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Testcase Result Summary:
total: 9018
passed: 9018
failed: 0
timeout: 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Tested-by: Hulk Robot <hulkrobot@huawei.com>

On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 05:05:40PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.93 release.
> There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Thu, 20 Jan 2022 16:04:42 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 

Build results:
	total: 159 pass: 159 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
	total: 474 pass: 474 fail: 0

Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

Guenter

On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 at 21:37, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.93 release.
> There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 20 Jan 2022 16:04:42 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.93-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>

## Build
* kernel: 5.10.93-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-5.10.y
* git commit: e0476c04ea8991e23850dab84ce56ab557c56986
* git describe: v5.10.91-50-ge0476c04ea89
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.91-50-ge0476c04ea89

## Test Regressions (compared to v5.10.92)
No test regressions found.

## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.10.92)
No metric regressions found.

## Test Fixes (compared to v5.10.92)
No test fixes found.

## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.10.92)
No metric fixes found.

## Test result summary
total: 91017, pass: 78176, fail: 498, skip: 11633, xfail: 796

## Build Summary
* arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 259 total, 259 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 37 total, 37 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 35 total, 35 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 34 total, 30 passed, 4 failed
* parisc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 52 total, 46 passed, 6 failed
* riscv: 24 total, 22 passed, 2 failed
* s390: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 37 total, 37 passed, 0 failed

## Test suites summary
* fwts
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_c_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_j_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_jc_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_none_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.nohint_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.paciasp_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_c_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_j_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_jc_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_none_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.nohint_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.paciasp_func
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* linux-log-parser
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests
* ltp-commands-tests
* ltp-containers-tests
* ltp-controllers-tests
* ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
* ltp-crypto-tests
* ltp-cve-tests
* ltp-dio-tests
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
* ltp-filecaps-tests
* ltp-fs-tests
* ltp-fs_bind-tests
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
* ltp-fsx-tests
* ltp-hugetlb-tests
* ltp-io-tests
* ltp-ipc-tests
* ltp-math-tests
* ltp-mm-tests
* ltp-nptl-tests
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty-tests
* ltp-sched-tests
* ltp-securebits-tests
* ltp-syscalls-tests
* ltp-tracing-tests
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* perf
* rcutorture
* ssuite
* v4l2-compliance

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org

On 1/18/22 9:05 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.93 release.
> There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Thu, 20 Jan 2022 16:04:42 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.93-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 

Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.

Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>

thanks,
-- Shuah

Hi!

> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.93 release.
> There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.

CIP testing did not find any new kernel problems here (but we still
hit the gmp.h compilation issue):

https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5.10.y

Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de>

Best regards,
                                                                Pavel
-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany

On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 06:35:24PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.93 release.
> > There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> 
> CIP testing did not find any new kernel problems here (but we still
> hit the gmp.h compilation issue):

If it bothers you, patches are always welcome.

thanks,

greg k-h