drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
sc7180 blow fuses got slightly chances to hit qfprom_reg_write timeout.
Current timeout is simply too low. Since blowing fuses is a
very rare operation, so the risk associated with overestimating this
number is low.
Increase fuse blow timeout from 1ms to 10ms.
Signed-off-by: Knox Chiou <knoxchiou@chromium.org>
---
drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c b/drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c
index c500d6235bf6b..1840d400fb53c 100644
--- a/drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c
+++ b/drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
/* Amount of time required to hold charge to blow fuse in micro-seconds */
#define QFPROM_FUSE_BLOW_POLL_US 100
-#define QFPROM_FUSE_BLOW_TIMEOUT_US 1000
+#define QFPROM_FUSE_BLOW_TIMEOUT_US 10000
#define QFPROM_BLOW_STATUS_OFFSET 0x048
#define QFPROM_BLOW_STATUS_BUSY 0x1
--
2.34.1.448.ga2b2bfdf31-goog
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 6:31 PM Knox Chiou <knoxchiou@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> sc7180 blow fuses got slightly chances to hit qfprom_reg_write timeout.
> Current timeout is simply too low. Since blowing fuses is a
> very rare operation, so the risk associated with overestimating this
> number is low.
> Increase fuse blow timeout from 1ms to 10ms.
>
> Signed-off-by: Knox Chiou <knoxchiou@chromium.org>
> ---
>
> drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Slight nit that ${SUBJECT} for patches usually doesn't end with a
period. Presumably if Srinivas cares he can fix it while applying.
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Srinivas
On Fri, Jan 7, 2022 at 6:57 AM Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 6:31 PM Knox Chiou <knoxchiou@chromium.org> wrote:
> >
> > sc7180 blow fuses got slightly chances to hit qfprom_reg_write timeout.
> > Current timeout is simply too low. Since blowing fuses is a
> > very rare operation, so the risk associated with overestimating this
> > number is low.
> > Increase fuse blow timeout from 1ms to 10ms.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Knox Chiou <knoxchiou@chromium.org>
> > ---
> >
> > drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Slight nit that ${SUBJECT} for patches usually doesn't end with a
> period. Presumably if Srinivas cares he can fix it while applying.
>
> Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
I noticed that this patch still isn't in linux-next. Did it get lost,
or are you waiting for anything additional before applying?
Thanks!
-Doug
On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 6:31 PM Knox Chiou <knoxchiou@chromium.org> wrote: > > sc7180 blow fuses got slightly chances to hit qfprom_reg_write timeout. > Current timeout is simply too low. Since blowing fuses is a > very rare operation, so the risk associated with overestimating this > number is low. > Increase fuse blow timeout from 1ms to 10ms. > > Signed-off-by: Knox Chiou <knoxchiou@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Evan Green <evgreen@chromium.org>
On 07/01/2022 02:31, Knox Chiou wrote: > sc7180 blow fuses got slightly chances to hit qfprom_reg_write timeout. > Current timeout is simply too low. Since blowing fuses is a > very rare operation, so the risk associated with overestimating this > number is low. > Increase fuse blow timeout from 1ms to 10ms. > > Signed-off-by: Knox Chiou <knoxchiou@chromium.org> Applied thanks, --srini > --- > > drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c b/drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c > index c500d6235bf6b..1840d400fb53c 100644 > --- a/drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c > +++ b/drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c > @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ > > /* Amount of time required to hold charge to blow fuse in micro-seconds */ > #define QFPROM_FUSE_BLOW_POLL_US 100 > -#define QFPROM_FUSE_BLOW_TIMEOUT_US 1000 > +#define QFPROM_FUSE_BLOW_TIMEOUT_US 10000 > > #define QFPROM_BLOW_STATUS_OFFSET 0x048 > #define QFPROM_BLOW_STATUS_BUSY 0x1
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.