[PATCH] spi: dt-bindings: mediatek,spi-mtk-nor: Fix example 'interrupts' property

Rob Herring posted 1 patch 2 years, 8 months ago
.../devicetree/bindings/spi/mediatek,spi-mtk-nor.yaml          | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
[PATCH] spi: dt-bindings: mediatek,spi-mtk-nor: Fix example 'interrupts' property
Posted by Rob Herring 2 years, 8 months ago
A phandle for 'interrupts' value is wrong and should be one or more numbers.

Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
---
 .../devicetree/bindings/spi/mediatek,spi-mtk-nor.yaml          | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/mediatek,spi-mtk-nor.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/mediatek,spi-mtk-nor.yaml
index 7393f30535df..da43a545614f 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/mediatek,spi-mtk-nor.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/mediatek,spi-mtk-nor.yaml
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ examples:
       nor_flash: spi@1100d000 {
         compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-nor";
         reg = <0 0x1100d000 0 0xe0>;
-        interrupts = <&spi_flash_irq>;
+        interrupts = <1>;
         clocks = <&pericfg CLK_PERI_SPI>, <&topckgen CLK_TOP_SPINFI_IFR_SEL>;
         clock-names = "spi", "sf";
         #address-cells = <1>;
@@ -84,4 +84,3 @@ examples:
         };
       };
     };
-
-- 
2.32.0

Re: [PATCH] spi: dt-bindings: mediatek,spi-mtk-nor: Fix example 'interrupts' property
Posted by Mark Brown 2 years, 8 months ago
On Thu, 6 Jan 2022 12:25:17 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> A phandle for 'interrupts' value is wrong and should be one or more numbers.
> 
> 

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] spi: dt-bindings: mediatek,spi-mtk-nor: Fix example 'interrupts' property
      commit: 3e718b44756e2829e7189a9504aa7a6d7f394d6c

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark