[PATCH -next] net: phy: micrel: use min() macro instead of doing it manually

Yang Li posted 1 patch 4 years, 6 months ago
drivers/net/phy/micrel.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
[PATCH -next] net: phy: micrel: use min() macro instead of doing it manually
Posted by Yang Li 4 years, 6 months ago
Fix following coccicheck warning:
./drivers/net/phy/micrel.c:1482:12-13: WARNING opportunity for min()

Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Yang Li <yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com>
---
 drivers/net/phy/micrel.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/micrel.c b/drivers/net/phy/micrel.c
index c6a97fcca0e6..dda426596445 100644
--- a/drivers/net/phy/micrel.c
+++ b/drivers/net/phy/micrel.c
@@ -1479,7 +1479,7 @@ static int ksz886x_cable_test_wait_for_completion(struct phy_device *phydev)
 				    !(val & KSZ8081_LMD_ENABLE_TEST),
 				    30000, 100000, true);
 
-	return ret < 0 ? ret : 0;
+	return min(ret, 0);
 }
 
 static int ksz886x_cable_test_one_pair(struct phy_device *phydev, int pair)
-- 
2.20.1.7.g153144c

Re: [PATCH -next] net: phy: micrel: use min() macro instead of doing it manually
Posted by Heiner Kallweit 4 years, 6 months ago
On 24.12.2021 10:12, Yang Li wrote:
> Fix following coccicheck warning:
> ./drivers/net/phy/micrel.c:1482:12-13: WARNING opportunity for min()
> 
Please always check whether a coccicheck warning makes sense,
and don't create "fixes" mechanically w/o thinking.
Here using min() doesn't make sense because it's not about a
numerical operation. ret < 0 is equivalent to is_err(ret).


> Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Li <yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/phy/micrel.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/micrel.c b/drivers/net/phy/micrel.c
> index c6a97fcca0e6..dda426596445 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/phy/micrel.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/micrel.c
> @@ -1479,7 +1479,7 @@ static int ksz886x_cable_test_wait_for_completion(struct phy_device *phydev)
>  				    !(val & KSZ8081_LMD_ENABLE_TEST),
>  				    30000, 100000, true);
>  
> -	return ret < 0 ? ret : 0;
> +	return min(ret, 0);
>  }
>  
>  static int ksz886x_cable_test_one_pair(struct phy_device *phydev, int pair)