The PL330 was commented out because its binding wasn't converted to a
schema. With the binding converted, the example now needs several updates.
However, while it's possible that the PL330 has a 'cci-control-port', there
aren't any platforms upstream which do. So rather than allowing
'cci-control-port' in the PL330 binding, let's just drop the example.

Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,cci-400.yaml | 10 ----------
 1 file changed, 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,cci-400.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,cci-400.yaml
index 4682f991a5c8..f8530a50863a 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,cci-400.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,cci-400.yaml
@@ -166,16 +166,6 @@ examples:
               };
           };
 
-          dma0: dma@3000000 {
-              /* compatible = "arm,pl330", "arm,primecell"; */
-              cci-control-port = <&cci_control0>;
-              reg = <0x0 0x3000000 0x0 0x1000>;
-              interrupts = <10>;
-              #dma-cells = <1>;
-              #dma-channels = <8>;
-              #dma-requests = <32>;
-          };
-
           cci@2c090000 {
               compatible = "arm,cci-400";
               #address-cells = <1>;
-- 
2.32.0

On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 11:08:03 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> The PL330 was commented out because its binding wasn't converted to a
> schema. With the binding converted, the example now needs several updates.
> However, while it's possible that the PL330 has a 'cci-control-port', there
> aren't any platforms upstream which do. So rather than allowing
> 'cci-control-port' in the PL330 binding, let's just drop the example.
> 
> Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,cci-400.yaml | 10 ----------
>  1 file changed, 10 deletions(-)
> 

Applied, thanks!