This series adds support for new SoC MT6873/MT8192/MT8195 to the spmi driver.
This series is based on Chun-Jie's patches[1].

[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/list/?series=521655

changes since v15:
- rebase to v5.15-rc1.
- refine patch [3/4] and [4/4]

James Lo (4):
  dt-bindings: spmi: remove the constraint of reg property
  dt-bindings: spmi: document binding for the Mediatek SPMI controller
  spmi: mediatek: Add support for MT6873/8192
  spmi: mediatek: Add support for MT8195

Henry Chen (1):
  spmi: mediatek: Add support for MT8195

Hsin-Hsiung Wang (3):
  dt-bindings: spmi: modify the constraint of reg property
  dt-bindings: spmi: document binding for the Mediatek SPMI controller
  spmi: mediatek: Add support for MT6873/8192

 .../bindings/spmi/mtk,spmi-mtk-pmif.yaml      |  76 +++
 .../devicetree/bindings/spmi/spmi.yaml        |   3 -
 drivers/spmi/Kconfig                          |  11 +
 drivers/spmi/Makefile                         |   1 +
 drivers/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.c                  | 542 ++++++++++++++++++
 5 files changed, 630 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/mtk,spmi-mtk-pmif.yaml
 create mode 100644 drivers/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.c

--
2.18.0

Quoting James Lo (2021-11-18 19:46:09)
> This series adds support for new SoC MT6873/MT8192/MT8195 to the spmi driver.
> This series is based on Chun-Jie's patches[1].
> 
> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/list/?series=521655

This isn't needed though right? I've picked these four patches up into
spmi-next.

On Thu, 2021-12-09 at 18:12 -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting James Lo (2021-11-18 19:46:09)
> > This series adds support for new SoC MT6873/MT8192/MT8195 to the
> > spmi driver.
> > This series is based on Chun-Jie's patches[1].
> > 
> > [1] 
> > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/list/?series=521655__;!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!ycJplySfH-hTtYCIdjkF0VvfKgtq2B1NeOaBAOw5GU05898X6B7FN21KLkKTZiPC$
> >  
> 
> This isn't needed though right? I've picked these four patches up
> into
> spmi-next.

Yes. You are right.
It's just for notice the patch dependency.
Many Thanks!