Hi,
On 2026-09-17 14:55 +0800, Zhenghui Hao wrote:
> hugetlb records its command line parameters from early_param()
> handlers and consumes them later from hugetlb_bootmem_alloc().
>
> Commit d49004c5f0c1 ("arch, mm: consolidate initialization of nodes,
> zones and memory map") moved that consumer into mm_core_init_early(),
> which runs before the generic parse_early_param() call in
> start_kernel(). Architectures that call parse_early_param() from
> setup_arch() are not affected, but on parisc the parameters are then
> recorded after they have already been consumed and are silently
> dropped.
Since parisc is one of very few architectures that does not call
parse_early_param() from setup_arch(), I think an easier fix would be
local to parisc.
And there is another related question more to parisc maintainers: do we
really need hugetlb on parisc these days?
> Patch 1/2 moves parse_early_param() before mm_core_init_early(),
> together with jump_label_init() and static_call_init() so that the
> "parameters may set static keys" guarantee still holds.
>
> Patch 2/2 makes this class of ordering problem non-silent. It cannot
> fire once 1/2 is applied; if you would rather take only the fix,
> please drop 2/2.
>
> Not tested on parisc hardware.
>
> Zhenghui Hao (2):
> init: parse early parameters before memory initialization
> hugetlb: report cmdline parameters recorded too late
>
> init/main.c | 8 ++++----
> mm/hugetlb.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
>
> base-commit: 9b87fdc9af2fbfcdb5c24a64139685ef80f6573f
> --
> 2.53.0
>
>
Hi, > Since parisc is one of very few architectures that does not call > parse_early_param() from setup_arch(), I think an easier fix would be > local to parisc. Agreed, that is simpler. Whether a fix is needed at all depends on the answer to your second question. If hugetlb is not needed on parisc anymore, there is nothing left to fix and I will drop this series. If it stays, I will send v2 with the change inside parisc's setup_arch(), keeping 2/2 so that the same kind of ordering problem would at least show up in the log. So I will wait for the parisc maintainers on that one. Thanks, Zhenghui
On Thu, Sep 17, 2026 at 05:19:46PM +0800, zhenghui.hao wrote: > Hi, > > > Since parisc is one of very few architectures that does not call > > parse_early_param() from setup_arch(), I think an easier fix would be > > local to parisc. you should really fix your email setup :/ > Agreed, that is simpler. > > Whether a fix is needed at all depends on the answer to your second > question. If hugetlb is not needed on parisc anymore, there is nothing > left to fix and I will drop this series. If it stays, I will send v2 > with the change inside parisc's setup_arch(), keeping 2/2 so that the > same kind of ordering problem would at least show up in the log. > > So I will wait for the parisc maintainers on that one. > > Thanks, > Zhenghui -- Sincerely yours, Mike.
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.