read_memory_info() invokes two shell pipelines to obtain MemFree and
Hugepagesize from /proc/meminfo. It does not check whether popen()
returns NULL before passing the result to fgets(), and it does not call
pclose() when fgets() fails.

Open /proc/meminfo directly and obtain both values in a single pass.
This removes the unchecked NULL path, closes the file on all paths, and
avoids dependencies on external commands.

The compaction test continues to pass after this change.

Signed-off-by: Warren Xiong <warren.xiong@ugreen.com>
---
Changes in v2:
- Replace the two boolean flags with a hit counter, as suggested by
  David Hildenbrand.

v1: https://lore.kernel.org/1785720615-5826-1-git-send-email-warren.xiong@ugreen.com/

 tools/testing/selftests/mm/compaction_test.c | 38 +++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/compaction_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/compaction_test.c
index 5b58258..30d4ace 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/compaction_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/compaction_test.c
@@ -29,30 +29,34 @@ struct map_list {
 
 int read_memory_info(unsigned long *memfree, unsigned long *hugepagesize)
 {
-	char  buffer[256] = {0};
-	char *cmd = "cat /proc/meminfo | grep -i memfree | grep -o '[0-9]*'";
-	FILE *cmdfile = popen(cmd, "r");
+	char buffer[256];
+	int found = 0;
+	FILE *file;
+	int ret = -1;
 
-	if (!(fgets(buffer, sizeof(buffer), cmdfile))) {
-		ksft_print_msg("Failed to read meminfo: %s\n", strerror(errno));
+	file = fopen("/proc/meminfo", "r");
+	if (!file) {
+		ksft_print_msg("Failed to open /proc/meminfo: %s\n",
+			       strerror(errno));
 		return -1;
 	}
 
-	pclose(cmdfile);
-
-	*memfree = atoll(buffer);
-	cmd = "cat /proc/meminfo | grep -i hugepagesize | grep -o '[0-9]*'";
-	cmdfile = popen(cmd, "r");
-
-	if (!(fgets(buffer, sizeof(buffer), cmdfile))) {
-		ksft_print_msg("Failed to read meminfo: %s\n", strerror(errno));
-		return -1;
+	while (fgets(buffer, sizeof(buffer), file) && found != 2) {
+		if (sscanf(buffer, "MemFree: %lu kB", memfree) == 1 ||
+		    sscanf(buffer, "Hugepagesize: %lu kB", hugepagesize) == 1)
+			found++;
 	}
 
-	pclose(cmdfile);
-	*hugepagesize = atoll(buffer);
+	if (ferror(file))
+		ksft_print_msg("Failed to read /proc/meminfo: %s\n",
+			       strerror(errno));
+	else if (found != 2)
+		ksft_print_msg("Failed to parse /proc/meminfo\n");
+	else
+		ret = 0;
 
-	return 0;
+	fclose(file);
+	return ret;
 }
 
 int prereq(void)
-- 
2.7.4

On 8/4/26 14:16, Warren Xiong wrote:
> read_memory_info() invokes two shell pipelines to obtain MemFree and
> Hugepagesize from /proc/meminfo. It does not check whether popen()
> returns NULL before passing the result to fgets(), and it does not call
> pclose() when fgets() fails.
> 
> Open /proc/meminfo directly and obtain both values in a single pass.
> This removes the unchecked NULL path, closes the file on all paths, and
> avoids dependencies on external commands.
> 
> The compaction test continues to pass after this change.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Warren Xiong <warren.xiong@ugreen.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Replace the two boolean flags with a hit counter, as suggested by
>   David Hildenbrand.
> 
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/1785720615-5826-1-git-send-email-warren.xiong@ugreen.com/
> 
>  tools/testing/selftests/mm/compaction_test.c | 38 +++++++++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/compaction_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/compaction_test.c
> index 5b58258..30d4ace 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/compaction_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/compaction_test.c
> @@ -29,30 +29,34 @@ struct map_list {
>  
>  int read_memory_info(unsigned long *memfree, unsigned long *hugepagesize)
>  {
> -	char  buffer[256] = {0};
> -	char *cmd = "cat /proc/meminfo | grep -i memfree | grep -o '[0-9]*'";
> -	FILE *cmdfile = popen(cmd, "r");
> +	char buffer[256];
> +	int found = 0;
> +	FILE *file;
> +	int ret = -1;
>  
> -	if (!(fgets(buffer, sizeof(buffer), cmdfile))) {
> -		ksft_print_msg("Failed to read meminfo: %s\n", strerror(errno));
> +	file = fopen("/proc/meminfo", "r");
> +	if (!file) {
> +		ksft_print_msg("Failed to open /proc/meminfo: %s\n",
> +			       strerror(errno));
>  		return -1;
>  	}
>  
> -	pclose(cmdfile);
> -
> -	*memfree = atoll(buffer);
> -	cmd = "cat /proc/meminfo | grep -i hugepagesize | grep -o '[0-9]*'";
> -	cmdfile = popen(cmd, "r");
> -
> -	if (!(fgets(buffer, sizeof(buffer), cmdfile))) {
> -		ksft_print_msg("Failed to read meminfo: %s\n", strerror(errno));
> -		return -1;
> +	while (fgets(buffer, sizeof(buffer), file) && found != 2) {
> +		if (sscanf(buffer, "MemFree: %lu kB", memfree) == 1 ||
> +		    sscanf(buffer, "Hugepagesize: %lu kB", hugepagesize) == 1)
> +			found++;

Just as information: when proposing that I was assuming that we would never ever
have two times the same entry in /proc/meminfo, which i think we can reasonably
assume.

Thanks!

Acked-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <david@kernel.org>

-- 
Cheers,

David