[tip: sched/core] sched/cache: Fix unpaired account_llc_enqueue/dequeue

tip-bot2 for Chen Yu posted 1 patch 4 days, 14 hours ago
include/linux/sched.h |  2 ++
init/init_task.c      |  1 +
kernel/sched/fair.c   | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
[tip: sched/core] sched/cache: Fix unpaired account_llc_enqueue/dequeue
Posted by tip-bot2 for Chen Yu 4 days, 14 hours ago
The following commit has been merged into the sched/core branch of tip:

Commit-ID:     03755348b8e74421f92ffed9da159175a698290b
Gitweb:        https://git.kernel.org/tip/03755348b8e74421f92ffed9da159175a698290b
Author:        Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
AuthorDate:    Wed, 13 May 2026 13:39:21 -07:00
Committer:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
CommitterDate: Mon, 18 May 2026 21:33:17 +02:00

sched/cache: Fix unpaired account_llc_enqueue/dequeue

There is a race condition that, after a task is enqueued
on a runqueue, task_llc(p) may change due to CPU hotplug,
because the llc_id is dynamically allocated and adjusted
at runtime.
Therefore, checking task_llc(p) to determine whether the
task is being dequeued from its preferred LLC is unreliable
and can cause inconsistent values.

To fix this problem, record whether p is enqueued on its
preferred LLC, in order to pair with account_llc_dequeue()
to maintain a consistent nr_pref_llc_running per runqueue.

This bug was reported by sashiko, and the solution was once
suggested by Prateek.

Fixes: 46afe3af7ead ("sched/cache: Track LLC-preferred tasks per runqueue")
Suggested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/0c8c6a1571d66792a4d2ff0103ba3cc13e059046.1778703694.git.tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com
---
 include/linux/sched.h |  2 ++
 init/init_task.c      |  1 +
 kernel/sched/fair.c   | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 9572967..2c9e8e2 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1410,6 +1410,8 @@ struct task_struct {
 #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CACHE
 	struct callback_head		cache_work;
 	int				preferred_llc;
+	/* 1: task was enqueued to its preferred LLC, 0 otherwise */
+	int				pref_llc_queued;
 #endif
 
 	struct rseq_data		rseq;
diff --git a/init/init_task.c b/init/init_task.c
index 5d90db4..3ecd66f 100644
--- a/init/init_task.c
+++ b/init/init_task.c
@@ -217,6 +217,7 @@ struct task_struct init_task __aligned(L1_CACHE_BYTES) = {
 #endif
 #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CACHE
 	.preferred_llc  = -1,
+	.pref_llc_queued  = 0,
 #endif
 #if defined(CONFIG_KASAN_GENERIC) || defined(CONFIG_KASAN_SW_TAGS)
 	.kasan_depth	= 1,
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 087445e..96c61ce 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -1472,15 +1472,32 @@ static bool invalid_llc_nr(struct mm_struct *mm, struct task_struct *p,
 
 static void account_llc_enqueue(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
 {
+	int pref_llc, pref_llc_queued;
 	struct sched_domain *sd;
-	int pref_llc;
 
 	pref_llc = p->preferred_llc;
 	if (pref_llc < 0)
 		return;
 
+	pref_llc_queued = (pref_llc == task_llc(p));
 	rq->nr_llc_running++;
-	rq->nr_pref_llc_running += (pref_llc == task_llc(p));
+	rq->nr_pref_llc_running += pref_llc_queued;
+
+	/*
+	 * Record whether p is enqueued on its preferred
+	 * LLC, in order to pair with account_llc_dequeue()
+	 * to maintain a consistent nr_pref_llc_running per
+	 * runqueue.
+	 * This is necessary because a race condition exists:
+	 * after a task is enqueued on a runqueue, task_llc(p)
+	 * may change due to CPU hotplug. Therefore, checking
+	 * task_llc(p) to determine whether the task is being
+	 * dequeued from its preferred LLC is unreliable and
+	 * can cause inconsistent values - checking the
+	 * p->pref_llc_queued in account_llc_dequeue() would
+	 * be reliable.
+	 */
+	p->pref_llc_queued = pref_llc_queued;
 
 	sd = rcu_dereference_all(rq->sd);
 	if (sd && (unsigned int)pref_llc < sd->llc_max)
@@ -1497,7 +1514,15 @@ static void account_llc_dequeue(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
 		return;
 
 	rq->nr_llc_running--;
-	rq->nr_pref_llc_running -= (pref_llc == task_llc(p));
+	if (p->pref_llc_queued) {
+		rq->nr_pref_llc_running--;
+		/*
+		 * Update the status in case
+		 * other logic might query
+		 * this.
+		 */
+		p->pref_llc_queued = 0;
+	}
 
 	sd = rcu_dereference_all(rq->sd);
 	if (sd && (unsigned int)pref_llc < sd->llc_max) {