[tip: x86/cpu] x86/cpu/amd: Correct the microcode table for Zenbleed

tip-bot2 for Andrew Cooper posted 1 patch 11 hours ago
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c | 30 +++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
[tip: x86/cpu] x86/cpu/amd: Correct the microcode table for Zenbleed
Posted by tip-bot2 for Andrew Cooper 11 hours ago
The following commit has been merged into the x86/cpu branch of tip:

Commit-ID:     fb7bfa31b8e8569f154f2fe0ea6c2f03c0f087aa
Gitweb:        https://git.kernel.org/tip/fb7bfa31b8e8569f154f2fe0ea6c2f03c0f087aa
Author:        Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
AuthorDate:    Wed, 26 Nov 2025 13:03:52 
Committer:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitterDate: Sun, 14 Dec 2025 09:54:46 +01:00

x86/cpu/amd: Correct the microcode table for Zenbleed

The good revisions are tied to exact steppings, meaning it's not valid to
match on model number alone, let alone a range.

This is probably only a latent issue.  From public microcode archives, the
following CPUs exist 17-30-00, 17-60-00, 17-70-00 and would be captured by the
model ranges.  They're likely pre-production steppings, and likely didn't get
Zenbleed microcode, but it's still incorrect to compare them to a different
steppings revision.

Either way, convert the logic to use x86_match_min_microcode_rev(), which is
the preferred mechanism.

Fixes: 522b1d69219d ("x86/cpu/amd: Add a Zenbleed fix")
Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251126130352.880424-1-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c | 30 +++++++++---------------------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
index bc94ff1..86059f2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
@@ -951,26 +951,14 @@ static void init_amd_zen1(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 	}
 }
 
-static bool cpu_has_zenbleed_microcode(void)
-{
-	u32 good_rev = 0;
-
-	switch (boot_cpu_data.x86_model) {
-	case 0x30 ... 0x3f: good_rev = 0x0830107b; break;
-	case 0x60 ... 0x67: good_rev = 0x0860010c; break;
-	case 0x68 ... 0x6f: good_rev = 0x08608107; break;
-	case 0x70 ... 0x7f: good_rev = 0x08701033; break;
-	case 0xa0 ... 0xaf: good_rev = 0x08a00009; break;
-
-	default:
-		return false;
-	}
-
-	if (boot_cpu_data.microcode < good_rev)
-		return false;
-
-	return true;
-}
+static const struct x86_cpu_id amd_zenbleed_microcode[] = {
+	ZEN_MODEL_STEP_UCODE(0x17, 0x31, 0x0, 0x0830107b),
+	ZEN_MODEL_STEP_UCODE(0x17, 0x60, 0x1, 0x0860010c),
+	ZEN_MODEL_STEP_UCODE(0x17, 0x68, 0x1, 0x08608107),
+	ZEN_MODEL_STEP_UCODE(0x17, 0x71, 0x0, 0x08701033),
+	ZEN_MODEL_STEP_UCODE(0x17, 0xa0, 0x0, 0x08a00009),
+	{}
+};
 
 static void zen2_zenbleed_check(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 {
@@ -980,7 +968,7 @@ static void zen2_zenbleed_check(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 	if (!cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_AVX))
 		return;
 
-	if (!cpu_has_zenbleed_microcode()) {
+	if (!x86_match_min_microcode_rev(amd_zenbleed_microcode)) {
 		pr_notice_once("Zenbleed: please update your microcode for the most optimal fix\n");
 		msr_set_bit(MSR_AMD64_DE_CFG, MSR_AMD64_DE_CFG_ZEN2_FP_BACKUP_FIX_BIT);
 	} else {