kernel/sched/core.c | 27 ++++++--------------------- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
The following commit has been merged into the sched/core branch of tip:
Commit-ID: 942b8db965006cf655d356162f7091a9238da94e
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/942b8db965006cf655d356162f7091a9238da94e
Author: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
AuthorDate: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 09:46:44 +02:00
Committer: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
CommitterDate: Thu, 16 Oct 2025 11:13:52 +02:00
sched: Fix migrate_disable_switch() locking
For some reason migrate_disable_switch() was more complicated than it
needs to be, resulting in mind bending locking of dubious quality.
Recognise that migrate_disable_switch() must be called before a
context switch, but any place before that switch is equally good.
Since the current place results in troubled locking, simply move the
thing before taking rq->lock.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 27 ++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 4a4dbce..f2d16d1 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -2346,10 +2346,10 @@ static void migrate_disable_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
if (p->cpus_ptr != &p->cpus_mask)
return;
- /*
- * Violates locking rules! See comment in __do_set_cpus_allowed().
- */
- __do_set_cpus_allowed(p, &ac);
+ scoped_guard (task_rq_lock, p) {
+ update_rq_clock(scope.rq);
+ __do_set_cpus_allowed(p, &ac);
+ }
}
void ___migrate_enable(void)
@@ -2667,22 +2667,7 @@ __do_set_cpus_allowed(struct task_struct *p, struct affinity_context *ctx)
struct rq *rq = task_rq(p);
bool queued, running;
- /*
- * This here violates the locking rules for affinity, since we're only
- * supposed to change these variables while holding both rq->lock and
- * p->pi_lock.
- *
- * HOWEVER, it magically works, because ttwu() is the only code that
- * accesses these variables under p->pi_lock and only does so after
- * smp_cond_load_acquire(&p->on_cpu, !VAL), and we're in __schedule()
- * before finish_task().
- *
- * XXX do further audits, this smells like something putrid.
- */
- if (ctx->flags & SCA_MIGRATE_DISABLE)
- WARN_ON_ONCE(!p->on_cpu);
- else
- lockdep_assert_held(&p->pi_lock);
+ lockdep_assert_held(&p->pi_lock);
queued = task_on_rq_queued(p);
running = task_current_donor(rq, p);
@@ -6781,6 +6766,7 @@ static void __sched notrace __schedule(int sched_mode)
local_irq_disable();
rcu_note_context_switch(preempt);
+ migrate_disable_switch(rq, prev);
/*
* Make sure that signal_pending_state()->signal_pending() below
@@ -6887,7 +6873,6 @@ keep_resched:
*/
++*switch_count;
- migrate_disable_switch(rq, prev);
psi_account_irqtime(rq, prev, next);
psi_sched_switch(prev, next, !task_on_rq_queued(prev) ||
prev->se.sched_delayed);
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.