[tip: timers/urgent] timekeeping: Zero initialize system_counterval when querying time from phc drivers

tip-bot2 for Markus Blöchl posted 1 patch 2 months, 2 weeks ago
kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
[tip: timers/urgent] timekeeping: Zero initialize system_counterval when querying time from phc drivers
Posted by tip-bot2 for Markus Blöchl 2 months, 2 weeks ago
The following commit has been merged into the timers/urgent branch of tip:

Commit-ID:     67c632b4a7fbd6b76a08b86f4950f0f84de93439
Gitweb:        https://git.kernel.org/tip/67c632b4a7fbd6b76a08b86f4950f0f84de93439
Author:        Markus Blöchl <markus@blochl.de>
AuthorDate:    Sun, 20 Jul 2025 15:54:51 +02:00
Committer:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
CommitterDate: Tue, 22 Jul 2025 14:25:21 +02:00

timekeeping: Zero initialize system_counterval when querying time from phc drivers

Most drivers only populate the fields cycles and cs_id of system_counterval
in their get_time_fn() callback for get_device_system_crosststamp(), unless
they explicitly provide nanosecond values.

When the use_nsecs field was added to struct system_counterval, most
drivers did not care.  Clock sources other than CSID_GENERIC could then get
converted in convert_base_to_cs() based on an uninitialized use_nsecs field,
which usually results in -EINVAL during the following range check.

Pass in a fully zero initialized system_counterval_t to cure that.

Fixes: 6b2e29977518 ("timekeeping: Provide infrastructure for converting to/from a base clock")
Signed-off-by: Markus Blöchl <markus@blochl.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250720-timekeeping_uninit_crossts-v2-1-f513c885b7c2@blochl.de

---
 kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
index a009c91..83c65f3 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
@@ -1256,7 +1256,7 @@ int get_device_system_crosststamp(int (*get_time_fn)
 				  struct system_time_snapshot *history_begin,
 				  struct system_device_crosststamp *xtstamp)
 {
-	struct system_counterval_t system_counterval;
+	struct system_counterval_t system_counterval = {};
 	struct timekeeper *tk = &tk_core.timekeeper;
 	u64 cycles, now, interval_start;
 	unsigned int clock_was_set_seq = 0;