Factor out the check for enabling auto eoi, to be reused in root
partition code.
Signed-off-by: Nuno Das Neves <nunodasneves@linux.microsoft.com>
---
drivers/hv/hv.c | 12 +-----------
include/asm-generic/mshyperv.h | 13 +++++++++++++
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hv/hv.c b/drivers/hv/hv.c
index a38f84548bc2..308c8f279df8 100644
--- a/drivers/hv/hv.c
+++ b/drivers/hv/hv.c
@@ -313,17 +313,7 @@ void hv_synic_enable_regs(unsigned int cpu)
shared_sint.vector = vmbus_interrupt;
shared_sint.masked = false;
-
- /*
- * On architectures where Hyper-V doesn't support AEOI (e.g., ARM64),
- * it doesn't provide a recommendation flag and AEOI must be disabled.
- */
-#ifdef HV_DEPRECATING_AEOI_RECOMMENDED
- shared_sint.auto_eoi =
- !(ms_hyperv.hints & HV_DEPRECATING_AEOI_RECOMMENDED);
-#else
- shared_sint.auto_eoi = 0;
-#endif
+ shared_sint.auto_eoi = hv_recommend_using_aeoi();
hv_set_msr(HV_MSR_SINT0 + VMBUS_MESSAGE_SINT, shared_sint.as_uint64);
/* Enable the global synic bit */
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/mshyperv.h b/include/asm-generic/mshyperv.h
index 258034dfd829..1f46d19a16aa 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/mshyperv.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/mshyperv.h
@@ -77,6 +77,19 @@ extern u64 hv_do_fast_hypercall16(u16 control, u64 input1, u64 input2);
bool hv_isolation_type_snp(void);
bool hv_isolation_type_tdx(void);
+/*
+ * On architectures where Hyper-V doesn't support AEOI (e.g., ARM64),
+ * it doesn't provide a recommendation flag and AEOI must be disabled.
+ */
+static inline bool hv_recommend_using_aeoi(void)
+{
+#ifdef HV_DEPRECATING_AEOI_RECOMMENDED
+ return !(ms_hyperv.hints & HV_DEPRECATING_AEOI_RECOMMENDED);
+#else
+ return false;
+#endif
+}
+
static inline struct hv_proximity_domain_info hv_numa_node_to_pxm_info(int node)
{
struct hv_proximity_domain_info pxm_info = {};
--
2.34.1
On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 7:09 AM Nuno Das Neves <nunodasneves@linux.microsoft.com> wrote: > > Factor out the check for enabling auto eoi, to be reused in root > partition code. > > Signed-off-by: Nuno Das Neves <nunodasneves@linux.microsoft.com> > --- Reviewed-by: Tianyu Lan <tiala@microsoft.com> -- Thanks Tianyu Lan
On 2/26/2025 3:07 PM, Nuno Das Neves wrote:
> Factor out the check for enabling auto eoi, to be reused in root
> partition code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nuno Das Neves <nunodasneves@linux.microsoft.com>
> ---
> drivers/hv/hv.c | 12 +-----------
> include/asm-generic/mshyperv.h | 13 +++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
<snip>
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/mshyperv.h b/include/asm-generic/mshyperv.h
> index 258034dfd829..1f46d19a16aa 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/mshyperv.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/mshyperv.h
> @@ -77,6 +77,19 @@ extern u64 hv_do_fast_hypercall16(u16 control, u64 input1, u64 input2);
> bool hv_isolation_type_snp(void);
> bool hv_isolation_type_tdx(void);
>
> +/*
> + * On architectures where Hyper-V doesn't support AEOI (e.g., ARM64),
> + * it doesn't provide a recommendation flag and AEOI must be disabled.
> + */
> +static inline bool hv_recommend_using_aeoi(void)
> +{
> +#ifdef HV_DEPRECATING_AEOI_RECOMMENDED
> + return !(ms_hyperv.hints & HV_DEPRECATING_AEOI_RECOMMENDED);
> +#else
> + return false;
> +#endif
> +}
> +
I must be missing something very basic here, and if so, I apologize, and please enlighten me.
HV_DEPRECATING_AEOI_RECOMMENDED is defined as BIT(9) in include/hyperv/hvgdk_mini.h, and
asm-generic/mshyperv.h includes that via include/hyperv/hvhdk.h.
If this is the case, when would HV_DEPRECATING_AEOI_RECOMMENDED ever be not defined?
If it's always defined, do we need the #ifdef?
Thanks,
Easwar (he/him)
On 2/27/2025 3:03 PM, Easwar Hariharan wrote:
> On 2/26/2025 3:07 PM, Nuno Das Neves wrote:
>> Factor out the check for enabling auto eoi, to be reused in root
>> partition code.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nuno Das Neves <nunodasneves@linux.microsoft.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/hv/hv.c | 12 +-----------
>> include/asm-generic/mshyperv.h | 13 +++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>
> <snip>
>
>> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/mshyperv.h b/include/asm-generic/mshyperv.h
>> index 258034dfd829..1f46d19a16aa 100644
>> --- a/include/asm-generic/mshyperv.h
>> +++ b/include/asm-generic/mshyperv.h
>> @@ -77,6 +77,19 @@ extern u64 hv_do_fast_hypercall16(u16 control, u64 input1, u64 input2);
>> bool hv_isolation_type_snp(void);
>> bool hv_isolation_type_tdx(void);
>>
>> +/*
>> + * On architectures where Hyper-V doesn't support AEOI (e.g., ARM64),
>> + * it doesn't provide a recommendation flag and AEOI must be disabled.
>> + */
>> +static inline bool hv_recommend_using_aeoi(void)
>> +{
>> +#ifdef HV_DEPRECATING_AEOI_RECOMMENDED
>> + return !(ms_hyperv.hints & HV_DEPRECATING_AEOI_RECOMMENDED);
>> +#else
>> + return false;
>> +#endif
>> +}
>> +
>
> I must be missing something very basic here, and if so, I apologize, and please enlighten me.
>
> HV_DEPRECATING_AEOI_RECOMMENDED is defined as BIT(9) in include/hyperv/hvgdk_mini.h, and
> asm-generic/mshyperv.h includes that via include/hyperv/hvhdk.h.
>
> If this is the case, when would HV_DEPRECATING_AEOI_RECOMMENDED ever be not defined?
> If it's always defined, do we need the #ifdef?
>
HV_DEPRECATING_AEOI_RECOMMENDED is only defined on x86 (it used to live in x86 hyperv-tlfs.h).
It lives inside a #if defined(CONFIG_X86) block in hvgdk_mini.h. It is a bit confusing since
it is surrounded by other x86-only definitions which are prefixed with HV_X64_.
Thanks
Nuno
> Thanks,
> Easwar (he/him)
On 2/27/2025 4:33 PM, Nuno Das Neves wrote:
> On 2/27/2025 3:03 PM, Easwar Hariharan wrote:
>> On 2/26/2025 3:07 PM, Nuno Das Neves wrote:
>>> Factor out the check for enabling auto eoi, to be reused in root
>>> partition code.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Nuno Das Neves <nunodasneves@linux.microsoft.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/hv/hv.c | 12 +-----------
>>> include/asm-generic/mshyperv.h | 13 +++++++++++++
>>> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>>
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>>> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/mshyperv.h b/include/asm-generic/mshyperv.h
>>> index 258034dfd829..1f46d19a16aa 100644
>>> --- a/include/asm-generic/mshyperv.h
>>> +++ b/include/asm-generic/mshyperv.h
>>> @@ -77,6 +77,19 @@ extern u64 hv_do_fast_hypercall16(u16 control, u64 input1, u64 input2);
>>> bool hv_isolation_type_snp(void);
>>> bool hv_isolation_type_tdx(void);
>>>
>>> +/*
>>> + * On architectures where Hyper-V doesn't support AEOI (e.g., ARM64),
>>> + * it doesn't provide a recommendation flag and AEOI must be disabled.
>>> + */
>>> +static inline bool hv_recommend_using_aeoi(void)
>>> +{
>>> +#ifdef HV_DEPRECATING_AEOI_RECOMMENDED
>>> + return !(ms_hyperv.hints & HV_DEPRECATING_AEOI_RECOMMENDED);
>>> +#else
>>> + return false;
>>> +#endif
>>> +}
>>> +
>>
>> I must be missing something very basic here, and if so, I apologize, and please enlighten me.
>>
>> HV_DEPRECATING_AEOI_RECOMMENDED is defined as BIT(9) in include/hyperv/hvgdk_mini.h, and
>> asm-generic/mshyperv.h includes that via include/hyperv/hvhdk.h.
>>
>> If this is the case, when would HV_DEPRECATING_AEOI_RECOMMENDED ever be not defined?
>> If it's always defined, do we need the #ifdef?
>>
> HV_DEPRECATING_AEOI_RECOMMENDED is only defined on x86 (it used to live in x86 hyperv-tlfs.h).
> It lives inside a #if defined(CONFIG_X86) block in hvgdk_mini.h. It is a bit confusing since
> it is surrounded by other x86-only definitions which are prefixed with HV_X64_.
>
Ah, thank you. I knew it must be something glaringly obvious in hindsight. With that resolved,
Reviewed-by: Easwar Hariharan <eahariha@linux.microsoft.com>
On 2/26/2025 3:07 PM, Nuno Das Neves wrote: > Factor out the check for enabling auto eoi, to be reused in root > partition code. > > Signed-off-by: Nuno Das Neves <nunodasneves@linux.microsoft.com> > --- I think adding "No functional changes" would bring some benefit: that's an additional invariant to check against when reviewing. -- Thank you, Roman
On 2/27/2025 10:04 AM, Roman Kisel wrote: > > > On 2/26/2025 3:07 PM, Nuno Das Neves wrote: >> Factor out the check for enabling auto eoi, to be reused in root >> partition code. >> >> Signed-off-by: Nuno Das Neves <nunodasneves@linux.microsoft.com> >> --- > > I think adding "No functional changes" would bring some benefit: > that's an additional invariant to check against when reviewing. > Thanks, I can add it for next version :)
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 03:07:58PM -0800, Nuno Das Neves wrote: > Factor out the check for enabling auto eoi, to be reused in root > partition code. > Reviewed-by: Stanislav Kinsburskii <skinsburskii@linux.microsoft.com>
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.