[tip: objtool/core] x86/unwind/orc: Fix unwind for newly forked tasks

tip-bot2 for Zheng Yejian posted 1 patch 3 weeks, 2 days ago
arch/x86/kernel/unwind_orc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
[tip: objtool/core] x86/unwind/orc: Fix unwind for newly forked tasks
Posted by tip-bot2 for Zheng Yejian 3 weeks, 2 days ago
The following commit has been merged into the objtool/core branch of tip:

Commit-ID:     3bf19a0fb690022ec22ce87a5afeb1030cbcb56c
Gitweb:        https://git.kernel.org/tip/3bf19a0fb690022ec22ce87a5afeb1030cbcb56c
Author:        Zheng Yejian <zhengyejian@huaweicloud.com>
AuthorDate:    Fri, 13 Sep 2024 10:45:01 +08:00
Committer:     Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
CommitterDate: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 15:13:07 -07:00

x86/unwind/orc: Fix unwind for newly forked tasks

When arch_stack_walk_reliable() is called to unwind for newly forked
tasks, the return value is negative which means the call stack is
unreliable. This obviously does not meet expectations.

The root cause is that after commit 3aec4ecb3d1f ("x86: Rewrite
 ret_from_fork() in C"), the 'ret_addr' of newly forked task is changed
to 'ret_from_fork_asm' (see copy_thread()), then at the start of the
unwind, it is incorrectly interprets not as a "signal" one because
'ret_from_fork' is still used to determine the initial "signal" (see
__unwind_start()). Then the address gets incorrectly decremented in the
call to orc_find() (see unwind_next_frame()) and resulting in the
incorrect ORC data.

To fix it, check 'ret_from_fork_asm' rather than 'ret_from_fork' in
__unwind_start().

Fixes: 3aec4ecb3d1f ("x86: Rewrite ret_from_fork() in C")
Signed-off-by: Zheng Yejian <zhengyejian@huaweicloud.com>
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/unwind_orc.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_orc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_orc.c
index d00c28a..d4705a3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_orc.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_orc.c
@@ -723,7 +723,7 @@ void __unwind_start(struct unwind_state *state, struct task_struct *task,
 		state->sp = task->thread.sp + sizeof(*frame);
 		state->bp = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(frame->bp);
 		state->ip = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(frame->ret_addr);
-		state->signal = (void *)state->ip == ret_from_fork;
+		state->signal = (void *)state->ip == ret_from_fork_asm;
 	}
 
 	if (get_stack_info((unsigned long *)state->sp, state->task,