The following commit has been merged into the locking/core branch of tip:

Commit-ID:     afc256e131bb0e1ecb5e2b1df310b20fa7bd714d
Gitweb:        https://git.kernel.org/tip/afc256e131bb0e1ecb5e2b1df310b20fa7bd714d
Author:        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
AuthorDate:    Wed, 02 Oct 2024 17:03:55 +02:00
Committer:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
CommitterDate: Mon, 07 Oct 2024 09:28:35 +02:00

locking/spinlocks: Make __raw_* lock ops static

If CONFIG_GENERIC_LOCKBREAK=y and CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC=n
(e.g. sh/sdk7786_defconfig):

    kernel/locking/spinlock.c:68:17: warning: no previous prototype for '__raw_spin_lock' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
    kernel/locking/spinlock.c:80:26: warning: no previous prototype for '__raw_spin_lock_irqsave' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
    kernel/locking/spinlock.c:98:17: warning: no previous prototype for '__raw_spin_lock_irq' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
    kernel/locking/spinlock.c:103:17: warning: no previous prototype for '__raw_spin_lock_bh' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
    kernel/locking/spinlock.c:68:17: warning: no previous prototype for '__raw_read_lock' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
    kernel/locking/spinlock.c:80:26: warning: no previous prototype for '__raw_read_lock_irqsave' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
    kernel/locking/spinlock.c:98:17: warning: no previous prototype for '__raw_read_lock_irq' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
    kernel/locking/spinlock.c:103:17: warning: no previous prototype for '__raw_read_lock_bh' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
    kernel/locking/spinlock.c:68:17: warning: no previous prototype for '__raw_write_lock' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
    kernel/locking/spinlock.c:80:26: warning: no previous prototype for '__raw_write_lock_irqsave' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
    kernel/locking/spinlock.c:98:17: warning: no previous prototype for '__raw_write_lock_irq' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
    kernel/locking/spinlock.c:103:17: warning: no previous prototype for '__raw_write_lock_bh' [-Wmissing-prototypes]

All __raw_* lock ops are internal functions without external callers.
Hence fix this by making them static.

Note that if CONFIG_GENERIC_LOCKBREAK=y, no lock ops are inlined, as all
of CONFIG_INLINE_*_LOCK* depend on !GENERIC_LOCKBREAK.

Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/7201d7fb408375c6c4df541270d787b1b4a32354.1727879348.git.geert+renesas@glider.be
---
 kernel/locking/spinlock.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/spinlock.c b/kernel/locking/spinlock.c
index 438c608..7685def 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/spinlock.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/spinlock.c
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL(__mmiowb_state);
  * towards that other CPU that it should break the lock ASAP.
  */
 #define BUILD_LOCK_OPS(op, locktype)					\
-void __lockfunc __raw_##op##_lock(locktype##_t *lock)			\
+static void __lockfunc __raw_##op##_lock(locktype##_t *lock)		\
 {									\
 	for (;;) {							\
 		preempt_disable();					\
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ void __lockfunc __raw_##op##_lock(locktype##_t *lock)			\
 	}								\
 }									\
 									\
-unsigned long __lockfunc __raw_##op##_lock_irqsave(locktype##_t *lock)	\
+static unsigned long __lockfunc __raw_##op##_lock_irqsave(locktype##_t *lock) \
 {									\
 	unsigned long flags;						\
 									\
@@ -95,12 +95,12 @@ unsigned long __lockfunc __raw_##op##_lock_irqsave(locktype##_t *lock)	\
 	return flags;							\
 }									\
 									\
-void __lockfunc __raw_##op##_lock_irq(locktype##_t *lock)		\
+static void __lockfunc __raw_##op##_lock_irq(locktype##_t *lock)	\
 {									\
 	_raw_##op##_lock_irqsave(lock);					\
 }									\
 									\
-void __lockfunc __raw_##op##_lock_bh(locktype##_t *lock)		\
+static void __lockfunc __raw_##op##_lock_bh(locktype##_t *lock)		\
 {									\
 	unsigned long flags;						\
 									\