From: Deven Bowers <deven.desai@linux.microsoft.com>

dm-verity provides a strong guarantee of a block device's integrity. As
a generic way to check the integrity of a block device, it provides
those integrity guarantees to its higher layers, including the filesystem
level.

However, critical security metadata like the dm-verity roothash and its
signing information are not easily accessible to the LSMs.
To address this limitation, this patch introduces a mechanism to store
and manage these essential security details within a newly added LSM blob
in the block_device structure.

This addition allows LSMs to make access control decisions on the integrity
data stored within the block_device, enabling more flexible security
policies. For instance, LSMs can now revoke access to dm-verity devices
based on their roothashes, ensuring that only authorized and verified
content is accessible. Additionally, LSMs can enforce policies to only
allow files from dm-verity devices that have a valid digital signature to
execute, effectively blocking any unsigned files from execution, thus
enhancing security against unauthorized modifications.

The patch includes new hook calls, `security_bdev_setintegrity()`, in
dm-verity to expose the dm-verity roothash and the roothash signature to
LSMs via preresume() callback. By using the preresume() callback, it
ensures that the security metadata is consistently in sync with the
metadata of the dm-verity target in the current active mapping table.
The hook calls are depended on CONFIG_SECURITY.

Signed-off-by: Deven Bowers <deven.desai@linux.microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Fan Wu <wufan@linux.microsoft.com>
---
v2:
  + No Changes

v3:
  + No changes

v4:
  + No changes

v5:
  + No changes

v6:
  + Fix an improper cleanup that can result in
    a leak

v7:
  + Squash patch 08/12, 10/12 to [11/16]
  + Use part0 for block_device, to retrieve the block_device, when
    calling security_bdev_setsecurity

v8:
  + Undo squash of 08/12, 10/12 - separating drivers/md/ from
    security/ & block/
  + Use common-audit function for dmverity_signature.
  + Change implementation for storing the dm-verity digest to use the
    newly introduced dm_verity_digest structure introduced in patch
    14/20.
  + Create new structure, dm_verity_digest, containing digest algorithm,
    size, and digest itself to pass to the LSM layer. V7 was missing the
    algorithm.
  + Create an associated public header containing this new structure and
    the key values for the LSM hook, specific to dm-verity.
  + Additional information added to commit, discussing the layering of
    the changes and how the information passed will be used.

v9:
  + No changes

v10:
  + No changes

v11:
  + Add an optional field to save signature
  + Move the security hook call to the new finalize hook

v12:
  + No changes

v13:
  + No changes

v14:
  + Correct code format
  + Remove unnecessary header and switch to dm_disk()

v15:
  + Refactor security_bdev_setsecurity() to security_bdev_setintegrity()
  + Remove unnecessary headers

v16:
  + Use kmemdup to duplicate signature
  + Clean up lsm blob data in error case

v17:
  + Switch to depend on CONFIG_SECURITY
  + Use new enum name LSM_INT_DMVERITY_SIG_VALID

v18:
  + Amend commit title
  + Fix incorrect error handling
  + Make signature exposure depends on CONFIG_DM_VERITY_VERIFY_ROOTHASH_SIG
  + Fix inaccurate comment
  + Remove include/linux/dm-verity.h
  + use crypto_ahash_alg_name(v->tfm) instead of v->alg_name

v19:
  + Drop finalize callback and switch to preresume callback
  + Adding NULL check to avoid kmemdup when sig is NULL

v20:
  + Adding more documentation regarding the new setintegrity hook call
  + Update the code for getting hash algorithm from either v->ahash_tfm
    or v->shash_tfm
---
 drivers/md/dm-verity-target.c | 118 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/md/dm-verity.h        |   6 ++
 include/linux/security.h      |   9 ++-
 3 files changed, 132 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-verity-target.c b/drivers/md/dm-verity-target.c
index cf659c8feb29..24ba9a10444c 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-verity-target.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-verity-target.c
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
 #include <linux/scatterlist.h>
 #include <linux/string.h>
 #include <linux/jump_label.h>
+#include <linux/security.h>
 
 #define DM_MSG_PREFIX			"verity"
 
@@ -930,6 +931,41 @@ static void verity_io_hints(struct dm_target *ti, struct queue_limits *limits)
 	limits->dma_alignment = limits->logical_block_size - 1;
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY
+
+static int verity_init_sig(struct dm_verity *v, const void *sig,
+			   size_t sig_size)
+{
+	v->sig_size = sig_size;
+
+	if (sig) {
+		v->root_digest_sig = kmemdup(sig, v->sig_size, GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (!v->root_digest_sig)
+			return -ENOMEM;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void verity_free_sig(struct dm_verity *v)
+{
+	kfree(v->root_digest_sig);
+}
+
+#else
+
+static inline int verity_init_sig(struct dm_verity *v, const void *sig,
+				  size_t sig_size)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static inline void verity_free_sig(struct dm_verity *v)
+{
+}
+
+#endif /* CONFIG_SECURITY */
+
 static void verity_dtr(struct dm_target *ti)
 {
 	struct dm_verity *v = ti->private;
@@ -949,6 +985,7 @@ static void verity_dtr(struct dm_target *ti)
 	kfree(v->initial_hashstate);
 	kfree(v->root_digest);
 	kfree(v->zero_digest);
+	verity_free_sig(v);
 
 	if (v->ahash_tfm) {
 		static_branch_dec(&ahash_enabled);
@@ -1418,6 +1455,13 @@ static int verity_ctr(struct dm_target *ti, unsigned int argc, char **argv)
 		ti->error = "Root hash verification failed";
 		goto bad;
 	}
+
+	r = verity_init_sig(v, verify_args.sig, verify_args.sig_size);
+	if (r < 0) {
+		ti->error = "Cannot allocate root digest signature";
+		goto bad;
+	}
+
 	v->hash_per_block_bits =
 		__fls((1 << v->hash_dev_block_bits) / v->digest_size);
 
@@ -1559,8 +1603,79 @@ int dm_verity_get_root_digest(struct dm_target *ti, u8 **root_digest, unsigned i
 	return 0;
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_DM_VERITY_VERIFY_ROOTHASH_SIG
+
+static int verity_security_set_signature(struct block_device *bdev,
+					 struct dm_verity *v)
+{
+	/*
+	 * if the dm-verity target is unsigned, v->root_digest_sig will
+	 * be NULL, and the hook call is still required to let LSMs mark
+	 * the device as unsigned. This information is crucial for LSMs to
+	 * block operations such as execution on unsigned files
+	 */
+	return security_bdev_setintegrity(bdev,
+					  LSM_INT_DMVERITY_SIG_VALID,
+					  v->root_digest_sig,
+					  v->sig_size);
+}
+
+#else
+
+static inline int verity_security_set_signature(struct block_device *bdev,
+						struct dm_verity *v)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
+#endif /* CONFIG_DM_VERITY_VERIFY_ROOTHASH_SIG */
+
+/*
+ * Expose verity target's root hash and signature data to LSMs before resume.
+ *
+ * Returns 0 on success, or -ENOMEM if the system is out of memory.
+ */
+static int verity_preresume(struct dm_target *ti)
+{
+	struct block_device *bdev;
+	struct dm_verity_digest root_digest;
+	struct dm_verity *v;
+	int r;
+
+	v = ti->private;
+	bdev = dm_disk(dm_table_get_md(ti->table))->part0;
+	root_digest.digest = v->root_digest;
+	root_digest.digest_len = v->digest_size;
+	if (static_branch_unlikely(&ahash_enabled) && !v->shash_tfm)
+		root_digest.alg = crypto_ahash_alg_name(v->ahash_tfm);
+	else
+		root_digest.alg = crypto_shash_alg_name(v->shash_tfm);
+
+	r = security_bdev_setintegrity(bdev, LSM_INT_DMVERITY_ROOTHASH, &root_digest,
+				       sizeof(root_digest));
+	if (r)
+		return r;
+
+	r =  verity_security_set_signature(bdev, v);
+	if (r)
+		goto bad;
+
+	return 0;
+
+bad:
+
+	security_bdev_setintegrity(bdev, LSM_INT_DMVERITY_ROOTHASH, NULL, 0);
+
+	return r;
+}
+
+#endif /* CONFIG_SECURITY */
+
 static struct target_type verity_target = {
 	.name		= "verity",
+/* Note: the LSMs depend on the singleton and immutable features */
 	.features	= DM_TARGET_SINGLETON | DM_TARGET_IMMUTABLE,
 	.version	= {1, 10, 0},
 	.module		= THIS_MODULE,
@@ -1571,6 +1686,9 @@ static struct target_type verity_target = {
 	.prepare_ioctl	= verity_prepare_ioctl,
 	.iterate_devices = verity_iterate_devices,
 	.io_hints	= verity_io_hints,
+#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY
+	.preresume	= verity_preresume,
+#endif /* CONFIG_SECURITY */
 };
 module_dm(verity);
 
diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-verity.h b/drivers/md/dm-verity.h
index aac3a1b1d94a..ea2da450f173 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-verity.h
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-verity.h
@@ -45,6 +45,9 @@ struct dm_verity {
 	u8 *salt;		/* salt: its size is salt_size */
 	u8 *initial_hashstate;	/* salted initial state, if shash_tfm is set */
 	u8 *zero_digest;	/* digest for a zero block */
+#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY
+	u8 *root_digest_sig;	/* signature of the root digest */
+#endif /* CONFIG_SECURITY */
 	unsigned int salt_size;
 	sector_t data_start;	/* data offset in 512-byte sectors */
 	sector_t hash_start;	/* hash start in blocks */
@@ -58,6 +61,9 @@ struct dm_verity {
 	bool hash_failed:1;	/* set if hash of any block failed */
 	bool use_bh_wq:1;	/* try to verify in BH wq before normal work-queue */
 	unsigned int digest_size;	/* digest size for the current hash algorithm */
+#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY
+	unsigned int sig_size;	/* root digest signature size */
+#endif /* CONFIG_SECURITY */
 	unsigned int hash_reqsize; /* the size of temporary space for crypto */
 	enum verity_mode mode;	/* mode for handling verification errors */
 	unsigned int corrupted_errs;/* Number of errors for corrupted blocks */
diff --git a/include/linux/security.h b/include/linux/security.h
index 39aec1c96d6a..0604893f2f9e 100644
--- a/include/linux/security.h
+++ b/include/linux/security.h
@@ -83,8 +83,15 @@ enum lsm_event {
 	LSM_POLICY_CHANGE,
 };
 
+struct dm_verity_digest {
+	const char *alg;
+	const u8 *digest;
+	size_t digest_len;
+};
+
 enum lsm_integrity_type {
-	__LSM_INT_MAX
+	LSM_INT_DMVERITY_SIG_VALID,
+	LSM_INT_DMVERITY_ROOTHASH,
 };
 
 /*
-- 
2.44.0

Hi Mikulas,

I hope you’re doing well. I wanted to thank you again for your thorough 
review for the last version. I’ve since made some minor updates for this 
version, including adding more comments and refactoring the way the hash 
algorithm name is obtained due to recent changes in dm-verity.

Would you mind if we keep the Review-by tag on the latest version since 
the changes are minor? Your feedback is greatly valued, and I’d 
appreciate it if you could take a quick look when you have a moment.

-Fan

On 8/2/2024 11:08 PM, Fan Wu wrote:
> From: Deven Bowers <deven.desai@linux.microsoft.com>
> 
> dm-verity provides a strong guarantee of a block device's integrity. As
> a generic way to check the integrity of a block device, it provides
> those integrity guarantees to its higher layers, including the filesystem
> level.
> 
> However, critical security metadata like the dm-verity roothash and its
> signing information are not easily accessible to the LSMs.
> To address this limitation, this patch introduces a mechanism to store
> and manage these essential security details within a newly added LSM blob
> in the block_device structure.
> 
> This addition allows LSMs to make access control decisions on the integrity
> data stored within the block_device, enabling more flexible security
> policies. For instance, LSMs can now revoke access to dm-verity devices
> based on their roothashes, ensuring that only authorized and verified
> content is accessible. Additionally, LSMs can enforce policies to only
> allow files from dm-verity devices that have a valid digital signature to
> execute, effectively blocking any unsigned files from execution, thus
> enhancing security against unauthorized modifications.
> 
> The patch includes new hook calls, `security_bdev_setintegrity()`, in
> dm-verity to expose the dm-verity roothash and the roothash signature to
> LSMs via preresume() callback. By using the preresume() callback, it
> ensures that the security metadata is consistently in sync with the
> metadata of the dm-verity target in the current active mapping table.
> The hook calls are depended on CONFIG_SECURITY.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Deven Bowers <deven.desai@linux.microsoft.com>
> Signed-off-by: Fan Wu <wufan@linux.microsoft.com>
> ---
...
> 
> v20:
>    + Adding more documentation regarding the new setintegrity hook call
>    + Update the code for getting hash algorithm from either v->ahash_tfm
>      or v->shash_tfm
> ---
>   drivers/md/dm-verity-target.c | 118 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   drivers/md/dm-verity.h        |   6 ++
>   include/linux/security.h      |   9 ++-
>   3 files changed, 132 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-verity-target.c b/drivers/md/dm-verity-target.c
> index cf659c8feb29..24ba9a10444c 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/dm-verity-target.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/dm-verity-target.c
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
>   #include <linux/scatterlist.h>
>   #include <linux/string.h>
>   #include <linux/jump_label.h>
> +#include <linux/security.h>
>   
>   #define DM_MSG_PREFIX			"verity"
>   
> @@ -930,6 +931,41 @@ static void verity_io_hints(struct dm_target *ti, struct queue_limits *limits)
>   	limits->dma_alignment = limits->logical_block_size - 1;
>   }
>   
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY
> +
> +static int verity_init_sig(struct dm_verity *v, const void *sig,
> +			   size_t sig_size)
> +{
> +	v->sig_size = sig_size;
> +
> +	if (sig) {
> +		v->root_digest_sig = kmemdup(sig, v->sig_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> +		if (!v->root_digest_sig)
> +			return -ENOMEM;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void verity_free_sig(struct dm_verity *v)
> +{
> +	kfree(v->root_digest_sig);
> +}
> +
> +#else
> +
> +static inline int verity_init_sig(struct dm_verity *v, const void *sig,
> +				  size_t sig_size)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void verity_free_sig(struct dm_verity *v)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +#endif /* CONFIG_SECURITY */
> +
>   static void verity_dtr(struct dm_target *ti)
>   {
>   	struct dm_verity *v = ti->private;
> @@ -949,6 +985,7 @@ static void verity_dtr(struct dm_target *ti)
>   	kfree(v->initial_hashstate);
>   	kfree(v->root_digest);
>   	kfree(v->zero_digest);
> +	verity_free_sig(v);
>   
>   	if (v->ahash_tfm) {
>   		static_branch_dec(&ahash_enabled);
> @@ -1418,6 +1455,13 @@ static int verity_ctr(struct dm_target *ti, unsigned int argc, char **argv)
>   		ti->error = "Root hash verification failed";
>   		goto bad;
>   	}
> +
> +	r = verity_init_sig(v, verify_args.sig, verify_args.sig_size);
> +	if (r < 0) {
> +		ti->error = "Cannot allocate root digest signature";
> +		goto bad;
> +	}
> +
>   	v->hash_per_block_bits =
>   		__fls((1 << v->hash_dev_block_bits) / v->digest_size);
>   
> @@ -1559,8 +1603,79 @@ int dm_verity_get_root_digest(struct dm_target *ti, u8 **root_digest, unsigned i
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DM_VERITY_VERIFY_ROOTHASH_SIG
> +
> +static int verity_security_set_signature(struct block_device *bdev,
> +					 struct dm_verity *v)
> +{
> +	/*
> +	 * if the dm-verity target is unsigned, v->root_digest_sig will
> +	 * be NULL, and the hook call is still required to let LSMs mark
> +	 * the device as unsigned. This information is crucial for LSMs to
> +	 * block operations such as execution on unsigned files
> +	 */
> +	return security_bdev_setintegrity(bdev,
> +					  LSM_INT_DMVERITY_SIG_VALID,
> +					  v->root_digest_sig,
> +					  v->sig_size);
> +}
> +
> +#else
> +
> +static inline int verity_security_set_signature(struct block_device *bdev,
> +						struct dm_verity *v)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +#endif /* CONFIG_DM_VERITY_VERIFY_ROOTHASH_SIG */
> +
> +/*
> + * Expose verity target's root hash and signature data to LSMs before resume.
> + *
> + * Returns 0 on success, or -ENOMEM if the system is out of memory.
> + */
> +static int verity_preresume(struct dm_target *ti)
> +{
> +	struct block_device *bdev;
> +	struct dm_verity_digest root_digest;
> +	struct dm_verity *v;
> +	int r;
> +
> +	v = ti->private;
> +	bdev = dm_disk(dm_table_get_md(ti->table))->part0;
> +	root_digest.digest = v->root_digest;
> +	root_digest.digest_len = v->digest_size;
> +	if (static_branch_unlikely(&ahash_enabled) && !v->shash_tfm)
> +		root_digest.alg = crypto_ahash_alg_name(v->ahash_tfm);
> +	else
> +		root_digest.alg = crypto_shash_alg_name(v->shash_tfm);
> +
> +	r = security_bdev_setintegrity(bdev, LSM_INT_DMVERITY_ROOTHASH, &root_digest,
> +				       sizeof(root_digest));
> +	if (r)
> +		return r;
> +
> +	r =  verity_security_set_signature(bdev, v);
> +	if (r)
> +		goto bad;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +
> +bad:
> +
> +	security_bdev_setintegrity(bdev, LSM_INT_DMVERITY_ROOTHASH, NULL, 0);
> +
> +	return r;
> +}
> +
> +#endif /* CONFIG_SECURITY */
> +
>   static struct target_type verity_target = {
>   	.name		= "verity",
> +/* Note: the LSMs depend on the singleton and immutable features */
>   	.features	= DM_TARGET_SINGLETON | DM_TARGET_IMMUTABLE,
>   	.version	= {1, 10, 0},
>   	.module		= THIS_MODULE,
> @@ -1571,6 +1686,9 @@ static struct target_type verity_target = {
>   	.prepare_ioctl	= verity_prepare_ioctl,
>   	.iterate_devices = verity_iterate_devices,
>   	.io_hints	= verity_io_hints,
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY
> +	.preresume	= verity_preresume,
> +#endif /* CONFIG_SECURITY */
>   };
>   module_dm(verity);
>   
> diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-verity.h b/drivers/md/dm-verity.h
> index aac3a1b1d94a..ea2da450f173 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/dm-verity.h
> +++ b/drivers/md/dm-verity.h
> @@ -45,6 +45,9 @@ struct dm_verity {
>   	u8 *salt;		/* salt: its size is salt_size */
>   	u8 *initial_hashstate;	/* salted initial state, if shash_tfm is set */
>   	u8 *zero_digest;	/* digest for a zero block */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY
> +	u8 *root_digest_sig;	/* signature of the root digest */
> +#endif /* CONFIG_SECURITY */
>   	unsigned int salt_size;
>   	sector_t data_start;	/* data offset in 512-byte sectors */
>   	sector_t hash_start;	/* hash start in blocks */
> @@ -58,6 +61,9 @@ struct dm_verity {
>   	bool hash_failed:1;	/* set if hash of any block failed */
>   	bool use_bh_wq:1;	/* try to verify in BH wq before normal work-queue */
>   	unsigned int digest_size;	/* digest size for the current hash algorithm */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY
> +	unsigned int sig_size;	/* root digest signature size */
> +#endif /* CONFIG_SECURITY */
>   	unsigned int hash_reqsize; /* the size of temporary space for crypto */
>   	enum verity_mode mode;	/* mode for handling verification errors */
>   	unsigned int corrupted_errs;/* Number of errors for corrupted blocks */
> diff --git a/include/linux/security.h b/include/linux/security.h
> index 39aec1c96d6a..0604893f2f9e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/security.h
> +++ b/include/linux/security.h
> @@ -83,8 +83,15 @@ enum lsm_event {
>   	LSM_POLICY_CHANGE,
>   };
>   
> +struct dm_verity_digest {
> +	const char *alg;
> +	const u8 *digest;
> +	size_t digest_len;
> +};
> +
>   enum lsm_integrity_type {
> -	__LSM_INT_MAX
> +	LSM_INT_DMVERITY_SIG_VALID,
> +	LSM_INT_DMVERITY_ROOTHASH,
>   };
>   
>   /*

On Thu, Aug 8, 2024 at 6:38 PM Fan Wu <wufan@linux.microsoft.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Mikulas,
>
> I hope you’re doing well. I wanted to thank you again for your thorough
> review for the last version. I’ve since made some minor updates for this
> version, including adding more comments and refactoring the way the hash
> algorithm name is obtained due to recent changes in dm-verity.
>
> Would you mind if we keep the Review-by tag on the latest version since
> the changes are minor? Your feedback is greatly valued, and I’d
> appreciate it if you could take a quick look when you have a moment.

To add a bit more to this, this patchset now looks like it is in a
state where we would like to merge it into the LSM tree for the
upcoming merge window, but I would really like to make sure that the
device-mapper folks are okay with these changes; an
Acked-by/Reviewed-by on this patch would be appreciated, assuming you
are still okay with this patch.

For those who may be missing the context, the full patchset can be
found on lore at the link below:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-security-module/1722665314-21156-1-git-send-email-wufan@linux.microsoft.com

> On 8/2/2024 11:08 PM, Fan Wu wrote:
> > From: Deven Bowers <deven.desai@linux.microsoft.com>
> >
> > dm-verity provides a strong guarantee of a block device's integrity. As
> > a generic way to check the integrity of a block device, it provides
> > those integrity guarantees to its higher layers, including the filesystem
> > level.
> >
> > However, critical security metadata like the dm-verity roothash and its
> > signing information are not easily accessible to the LSMs.
> > To address this limitation, this patch introduces a mechanism to store
> > and manage these essential security details within a newly added LSM blob
> > in the block_device structure.
> >
> > This addition allows LSMs to make access control decisions on the integrity
> > data stored within the block_device, enabling more flexible security
> > policies. For instance, LSMs can now revoke access to dm-verity devices
> > based on their roothashes, ensuring that only authorized and verified
> > content is accessible. Additionally, LSMs can enforce policies to only
> > allow files from dm-verity devices that have a valid digital signature to
> > execute, effectively blocking any unsigned files from execution, thus
> > enhancing security against unauthorized modifications.
> >
> > The patch includes new hook calls, `security_bdev_setintegrity()`, in
> > dm-verity to expose the dm-verity roothash and the roothash signature to
> > LSMs via preresume() callback. By using the preresume() callback, it
> > ensures that the security metadata is consistently in sync with the
> > metadata of the dm-verity target in the current active mapping table.
> > The hook calls are depended on CONFIG_SECURITY.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Deven Bowers <deven.desai@linux.microsoft.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Fan Wu <wufan@linux.microsoft.com>
> > ---
> ...
> >
> > v20:
> >    + Adding more documentation regarding the new setintegrity hook call
> >    + Update the code for getting hash algorithm from either v->ahash_tfm
> >      or v->shash_tfm
> > ---
> >   drivers/md/dm-verity-target.c | 118 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >   drivers/md/dm-verity.h        |   6 ++
> >   include/linux/security.h      |   9 ++-
> >   3 files changed, 132 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-verity-target.c b/drivers/md/dm-verity-target.c
> > index cf659c8feb29..24ba9a10444c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/md/dm-verity-target.c
> > +++ b/drivers/md/dm-verity-target.c
> > @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
> >   #include <linux/scatterlist.h>
> >   #include <linux/string.h>
> >   #include <linux/jump_label.h>
> > +#include <linux/security.h>
> >
> >   #define DM_MSG_PREFIX                       "verity"
> >
> > @@ -930,6 +931,41 @@ static void verity_io_hints(struct dm_target *ti, struct queue_limits *limits)
> >       limits->dma_alignment = limits->logical_block_size - 1;
> >   }
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY
> > +
> > +static int verity_init_sig(struct dm_verity *v, const void *sig,
> > +                        size_t sig_size)
> > +{
> > +     v->sig_size = sig_size;
> > +
> > +     if (sig) {
> > +             v->root_digest_sig = kmemdup(sig, v->sig_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> > +             if (!v->root_digest_sig)
> > +                     return -ENOMEM;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void verity_free_sig(struct dm_verity *v)
> > +{
> > +     kfree(v->root_digest_sig);
> > +}
> > +
> > +#else
> > +
> > +static inline int verity_init_sig(struct dm_verity *v, const void *sig,
> > +                               size_t sig_size)
> > +{
> > +     return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline void verity_free_sig(struct dm_verity *v)
> > +{
> > +}
> > +
> > +#endif /* CONFIG_SECURITY */
> > +
> >   static void verity_dtr(struct dm_target *ti)
> >   {
> >       struct dm_verity *v = ti->private;
> > @@ -949,6 +985,7 @@ static void verity_dtr(struct dm_target *ti)
> >       kfree(v->initial_hashstate);
> >       kfree(v->root_digest);
> >       kfree(v->zero_digest);
> > +     verity_free_sig(v);
> >
> >       if (v->ahash_tfm) {
> >               static_branch_dec(&ahash_enabled);
> > @@ -1418,6 +1455,13 @@ static int verity_ctr(struct dm_target *ti, unsigned int argc, char **argv)
> >               ti->error = "Root hash verification failed";
> >               goto bad;
> >       }
> > +
> > +     r = verity_init_sig(v, verify_args.sig, verify_args.sig_size);
> > +     if (r < 0) {
> > +             ti->error = "Cannot allocate root digest signature";
> > +             goto bad;
> > +     }
> > +
> >       v->hash_per_block_bits =
> >               __fls((1 << v->hash_dev_block_bits) / v->digest_size);
> >
> > @@ -1559,8 +1603,79 @@ int dm_verity_get_root_digest(struct dm_target *ti, u8 **root_digest, unsigned i
> >       return 0;
> >   }
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY
> > +
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_DM_VERITY_VERIFY_ROOTHASH_SIG
> > +
> > +static int verity_security_set_signature(struct block_device *bdev,
> > +                                      struct dm_verity *v)
> > +{
> > +     /*
> > +      * if the dm-verity target is unsigned, v->root_digest_sig will
> > +      * be NULL, and the hook call is still required to let LSMs mark
> > +      * the device as unsigned. This information is crucial for LSMs to
> > +      * block operations such as execution on unsigned files
> > +      */
> > +     return security_bdev_setintegrity(bdev,
> > +                                       LSM_INT_DMVERITY_SIG_VALID,
> > +                                       v->root_digest_sig,
> > +                                       v->sig_size);
> > +}
> > +
> > +#else
> > +
> > +static inline int verity_security_set_signature(struct block_device *bdev,
> > +                                             struct dm_verity *v)
> > +{
> > +     return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +#endif /* CONFIG_DM_VERITY_VERIFY_ROOTHASH_SIG */
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Expose verity target's root hash and signature data to LSMs before resume.
> > + *
> > + * Returns 0 on success, or -ENOMEM if the system is out of memory.
> > + */
> > +static int verity_preresume(struct dm_target *ti)
> > +{
> > +     struct block_device *bdev;
> > +     struct dm_verity_digest root_digest;
> > +     struct dm_verity *v;
> > +     int r;
> > +
> > +     v = ti->private;
> > +     bdev = dm_disk(dm_table_get_md(ti->table))->part0;
> > +     root_digest.digest = v->root_digest;
> > +     root_digest.digest_len = v->digest_size;
> > +     if (static_branch_unlikely(&ahash_enabled) && !v->shash_tfm)
> > +             root_digest.alg = crypto_ahash_alg_name(v->ahash_tfm);
> > +     else
> > +             root_digest.alg = crypto_shash_alg_name(v->shash_tfm);
> > +
> > +     r = security_bdev_setintegrity(bdev, LSM_INT_DMVERITY_ROOTHASH, &root_digest,
> > +                                    sizeof(root_digest));
> > +     if (r)
> > +             return r;
> > +
> > +     r =  verity_security_set_signature(bdev, v);
> > +     if (r)
> > +             goto bad;
> > +
> > +     return 0;
> > +
> > +bad:
> > +
> > +     security_bdev_setintegrity(bdev, LSM_INT_DMVERITY_ROOTHASH, NULL, 0);
> > +
> > +     return r;
> > +}
> > +
> > +#endif /* CONFIG_SECURITY */
> > +
> >   static struct target_type verity_target = {
> >       .name           = "verity",
> > +/* Note: the LSMs depend on the singleton and immutable features */
> >       .features       = DM_TARGET_SINGLETON | DM_TARGET_IMMUTABLE,
> >       .version        = {1, 10, 0},
> >       .module         = THIS_MODULE,
> > @@ -1571,6 +1686,9 @@ static struct target_type verity_target = {
> >       .prepare_ioctl  = verity_prepare_ioctl,
> >       .iterate_devices = verity_iterate_devices,
> >       .io_hints       = verity_io_hints,
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY
> > +     .preresume      = verity_preresume,
> > +#endif /* CONFIG_SECURITY */
> >   };
> >   module_dm(verity);
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-verity.h b/drivers/md/dm-verity.h
> > index aac3a1b1d94a..ea2da450f173 100644
> > --- a/drivers/md/dm-verity.h
> > +++ b/drivers/md/dm-verity.h
> > @@ -45,6 +45,9 @@ struct dm_verity {
> >       u8 *salt;               /* salt: its size is salt_size */
> >       u8 *initial_hashstate;  /* salted initial state, if shash_tfm is set */
> >       u8 *zero_digest;        /* digest for a zero block */
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY
> > +     u8 *root_digest_sig;    /* signature of the root digest */
> > +#endif /* CONFIG_SECURITY */
> >       unsigned int salt_size;
> >       sector_t data_start;    /* data offset in 512-byte sectors */
> >       sector_t hash_start;    /* hash start in blocks */
> > @@ -58,6 +61,9 @@ struct dm_verity {
> >       bool hash_failed:1;     /* set if hash of any block failed */
> >       bool use_bh_wq:1;       /* try to verify in BH wq before normal work-queue */
> >       unsigned int digest_size;       /* digest size for the current hash algorithm */
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY
> > +     unsigned int sig_size;  /* root digest signature size */
> > +#endif /* CONFIG_SECURITY */
> >       unsigned int hash_reqsize; /* the size of temporary space for crypto */
> >       enum verity_mode mode;  /* mode for handling verification errors */
> >       unsigned int corrupted_errs;/* Number of errors for corrupted blocks */
> > diff --git a/include/linux/security.h b/include/linux/security.h
> > index 39aec1c96d6a..0604893f2f9e 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/security.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/security.h
> > @@ -83,8 +83,15 @@ enum lsm_event {
> >       LSM_POLICY_CHANGE,
> >   };
> >
> > +struct dm_verity_digest {
> > +     const char *alg;
> > +     const u8 *digest;
> > +     size_t digest_len;
> > +};
> > +
> >   enum lsm_integrity_type {
> > -     __LSM_INT_MAX
> > +     LSM_INT_DMVERITY_SIG_VALID,
> > +     LSM_INT_DMVERITY_ROOTHASH,
> >   };
> >
> >   /*



-- 
paul-moore.com

On Thu, 15 Aug 2024, Paul Moore wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 8, 2024 at 6:38 PM Fan Wu <wufan@linux.microsoft.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Mikulas,
> >
> > I hope you’re doing well. I wanted to thank you again for your thorough
> > review for the last version. I’ve since made some minor updates for this
> > version, including adding more comments and refactoring the way the hash
> > algorithm name is obtained due to recent changes in dm-verity.
> >
> > Would you mind if we keep the Review-by tag on the latest version since
> > the changes are minor? Your feedback is greatly valued, and I’d
> > appreciate it if you could take a quick look when you have a moment.
> 
> To add a bit more to this, this patchset now looks like it is in a
> state where we would like to merge it into the LSM tree for the
> upcoming merge window, but I would really like to make sure that the
> device-mapper folks are okay with these changes; an
> Acked-by/Reviewed-by on this patch would be appreciated, assuming you
> are still okay with this patch.
> 
> For those who may be missing the context, the full patchset can be
> found on lore at the link below:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-security-module/1722665314-21156-1-git-send-email-wufan@linux.microsoft.com

Hi

I'm not an expert in Linux security subsystems. I skimmed through the 
dm-verity patch, didn't find anything wrong with it, so you can add

Reviewed-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>

> > >
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY
> > > +     u8 *root_digest_sig;    /* signature of the root digest */
> > > +#endif /* CONFIG_SECURITY */
> > >       unsigned int salt_size;
> > >       sector_t data_start;    /* data offset in 512-byte sectors */
> > >       sector_t hash_start;    /* hash start in blocks */
> > > @@ -58,6 +61,9 @@ struct dm_verity {
> > >       bool hash_failed:1;     /* set if hash of any block failed */
> > >       bool use_bh_wq:1;       /* try to verify in BH wq before normal work-queue */
> > >       unsigned int digest_size;       /* digest size for the current hash algorithm */
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY
> > > +     unsigned int sig_size;  /* root digest signature size */
> > > +#endif /* CONFIG_SECURITY */
> > >       unsigned int hash_reqsize; /* the size of temporary space for crypto */
> > >       enum verity_mode mode;  /* mode for handling verification errors */
> > >       unsigned int corrupted_errs;/* Number of errors for corrupted blocks */

Just nit-picking: I would move "unsigned int sig_size" up, after "u8 
*root_digest_sig" entry.

Mikulas

On 8/16/2024 6:35 AM, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> 
> 
> On Thu, 15 Aug 2024, Paul Moore wrote:
> 
>> On Thu, Aug 8, 2024 at 6:38 PM Fan Wu <wufan@linux.microsoft.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Mikulas,
>>>
>>> I hope you’re doing well. I wanted to thank you again for your thorough
>>> review for the last version. I’ve since made some minor updates for this
>>> version, including adding more comments and refactoring the way the hash
>>> algorithm name is obtained due to recent changes in dm-verity.
>>>
>>> Would you mind if we keep the Review-by tag on the latest version since
>>> the changes are minor? Your feedback is greatly valued, and I’d
>>> appreciate it if you could take a quick look when you have a moment.
>>
>> To add a bit more to this, this patchset now looks like it is in a
>> state where we would like to merge it into the LSM tree for the
>> upcoming merge window, but I would really like to make sure that the
>> device-mapper folks are okay with these changes; an
>> Acked-by/Reviewed-by on this patch would be appreciated, assuming you
>> are still okay with this patch.
>>
>> For those who may be missing the context, the full patchset can be
>> found on lore at the link below:
>>
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-security-module/1722665314-21156-1-git-send-email-wufan@linux.microsoft.com
> 
> Hi
> 
> I'm not an expert in Linux security subsystems. I skimmed through the
> dm-verity patch, didn't find anything wrong with it, so you can add
> 
> Reviewed-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
>

Thank you for reviewing the patch and for your suggestion.

>>>>
>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY
>>>> +     u8 *root_digest_sig;    /* signature of the root digest */
>>>> +#endif /* CONFIG_SECURITY */
>>>>        unsigned int salt_size;
>>>>        sector_t data_start;    /* data offset in 512-byte sectors */
>>>>        sector_t hash_start;    /* hash start in blocks */
>>>> @@ -58,6 +61,9 @@ struct dm_verity {
>>>>        bool hash_failed:1;     /* set if hash of any block failed */
>>>>        bool use_bh_wq:1;       /* try to verify in BH wq before normal work-queue */
>>>>        unsigned int digest_size;       /* digest size for the current hash algorithm */
>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY
>>>> +     unsigned int sig_size;  /* root digest signature size */
>>>> +#endif /* CONFIG_SECURITY */
>>>>        unsigned int hash_reqsize; /* the size of temporary space for crypto */
>>>>        enum verity_mode mode;  /* mode for handling verification errors */
>>>>        unsigned int corrupted_errs;/* Number of errors for corrupted blocks */
> 
> Just nit-picking: I would move "unsigned int sig_size" up, after "u8
> *root_digest_sig" entry.
> 
> Mikulas

Sure, I can make these two fields together.

-Fan

On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 3:11 PM Fan Wu <wufan@linux.microsoft.com> wrote:
> On 8/16/2024 6:35 AM, Mikulas Patocka wrote:

...

> >>>>
> >>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY
> >>>> +     u8 *root_digest_sig;    /* signature of the root digest */
> >>>> +#endif /* CONFIG_SECURITY */
> >>>>        unsigned int salt_size;
> >>>>        sector_t data_start;    /* data offset in 512-byte sectors */
> >>>>        sector_t hash_start;    /* hash start in blocks */
> >>>> @@ -58,6 +61,9 @@ struct dm_verity {
> >>>>        bool hash_failed:1;     /* set if hash of any block failed */
> >>>>        bool use_bh_wq:1;       /* try to verify in BH wq before normal work-queue */
> >>>>        unsigned int digest_size;       /* digest size for the current hash algorithm */
> >>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY
> >>>> +     unsigned int sig_size;  /* root digest signature size */
> >>>> +#endif /* CONFIG_SECURITY */
> >>>>        unsigned int hash_reqsize; /* the size of temporary space for crypto */
> >>>>        enum verity_mode mode;  /* mode for handling verification errors */
> >>>>        unsigned int corrupted_errs;/* Number of errors for corrupted blocks */
> >
> > Just nit-picking: I would move "unsigned int sig_size" up, after "u8
> > *root_digest_sig" entry.
> >
> > Mikulas
>
> Sure, I can make these two fields together.

Fan, do you want me to move the @sig_size field when merging or are
you planning to submit another revision?  I'm happy to do it during
the merge, but I don't want to bother if you are going to post another
patchset.

-- 
paul-moore.com

On 8/18/2024 10:22 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 3:11 PM Fan Wu <wufan@linux.microsoft.com> wrote:
>> On 8/16/2024 6:35 AM, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY
>>>>>> +     u8 *root_digest_sig;    /* signature of the root digest */
>>>>>> +#endif /* CONFIG_SECURITY */
>>>>>>         unsigned int salt_size;
>>>>>>         sector_t data_start;    /* data offset in 512-byte sectors */
>>>>>>         sector_t hash_start;    /* hash start in blocks */
>>>>>> @@ -58,6 +61,9 @@ struct dm_verity {
>>>>>>         bool hash_failed:1;     /* set if hash of any block failed */
>>>>>>         bool use_bh_wq:1;       /* try to verify in BH wq before normal work-queue */
>>>>>>         unsigned int digest_size;       /* digest size for the current hash algorithm */
>>>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY
>>>>>> +     unsigned int sig_size;  /* root digest signature size */
>>>>>> +#endif /* CONFIG_SECURITY */
>>>>>>         unsigned int hash_reqsize; /* the size of temporary space for crypto */
>>>>>>         enum verity_mode mode;  /* mode for handling verification errors */
>>>>>>         unsigned int corrupted_errs;/* Number of errors for corrupted blocks */
>>>
>>> Just nit-picking: I would move "unsigned int sig_size" up, after "u8
>>> *root_digest_sig" entry.
>>>
>>> Mikulas
>>
>> Sure, I can make these two fields together.
> 
> Fan, do you want me to move the @sig_size field when merging or are
> you planning to submit another revision?  I'm happy to do it during
> the merge, but I don't want to bother if you are going to post another
> patchset.
> 

Thanks, Paul. It seems moving the field during the merge can expedite 
the process. Please go ahead with that. I appreciate your help with this!

-Fan

On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 1:47 PM Fan Wu <wufan@linux.microsoft.com> wrote:
> On 8/18/2024 10:22 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 3:11 PM Fan Wu <wufan@linux.microsoft.com> wrote:
> >> On 8/16/2024 6:35 AM, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY
> >>>>>> +     u8 *root_digest_sig;    /* signature of the root digest */
> >>>>>> +#endif /* CONFIG_SECURITY */
> >>>>>>         unsigned int salt_size;
> >>>>>>         sector_t data_start;    /* data offset in 512-byte sectors */
> >>>>>>         sector_t hash_start;    /* hash start in blocks */
> >>>>>> @@ -58,6 +61,9 @@ struct dm_verity {
> >>>>>>         bool hash_failed:1;     /* set if hash of any block failed */
> >>>>>>         bool use_bh_wq:1;       /* try to verify in BH wq before normal work-queue */
> >>>>>>         unsigned int digest_size;       /* digest size for the current hash algorithm */
> >>>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY
> >>>>>> +     unsigned int sig_size;  /* root digest signature size */
> >>>>>> +#endif /* CONFIG_SECURITY */
> >>>>>>         unsigned int hash_reqsize; /* the size of temporary space for crypto */
> >>>>>>         enum verity_mode mode;  /* mode for handling verification errors */
> >>>>>>         unsigned int corrupted_errs;/* Number of errors for corrupted blocks */
> >>>
> >>> Just nit-picking: I would move "unsigned int sig_size" up, after "u8
> >>> *root_digest_sig" entry.
> >>>
> >>> Mikulas
> >>
> >> Sure, I can make these two fields together.
> >
> > Fan, do you want me to move the @sig_size field when merging or are
> > you planning to submit another revision?  I'm happy to do it during
> > the merge, but I don't want to bother if you are going to post another
> > patchset.
>
> Thanks, Paul. It seems moving the field during the merge can expedite
> the process. Please go ahead with that. I appreciate your help with this!

No problem.  I'm going to merge these this afternoon, I'll send
another note when they are in the repo.

-- 
paul-moore.com