On 8/30/2023 9:33 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> Allow for the declaration of variables that trigger kvfree() when they
> go out of scope. The check for NULL and call to kvfree() can be elided
> by the compiler in most cases, otherwise without the NULL check an
> unnecessary call to kvfree() may be emitted. Peter proposed a comment
> for this detail [1].
>
> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/r/20230816103102.GF980931@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net [1]
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> ---
> include/linux/slab.h | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/slab.h b/include/linux/slab.h
> index 848c7c82ad5a..241025367943 100644
> --- a/include/linux/slab.h
> +++ b/include/linux/slab.h
> @@ -746,6 +746,8 @@ static inline __alloc_size(1, 2) void *kvcalloc(size_t n, size_t size, gfp_t fla
> extern void *kvrealloc(const void *p, size_t oldsize, size_t newsize, gfp_t flags)
> __realloc_size(3);
> extern void kvfree(const void *addr);
> +DEFINE_FREE(kvfree, void *, if (_T) kvfree(_T))
> +
> extern void kvfree_sensitive(const void *addr, size_t len);
>
> unsigned int kmem_cache_size(struct kmem_cache *s);
>
>
Liked this patch and use in the patch5. Still cannot comment on the
attestation part of things. So, for this patch:
Acked-by: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta@amd.com>