[PATCH net-next] ethtool: ioctl: improve error checking for set_wol

Justin Chen posted 1 patch 2 years, 8 months ago
There is a newer version of this series
net/ethtool/ioctl.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
[PATCH net-next] ethtool: ioctl: improve error checking for set_wol
Posted by Justin Chen 2 years, 8 months ago
The netlink version of set_wol checks for not supported wolopts and avoids
setting wol when the correct wolopt is already set. If we do the same with
the ioctl version then we can remove these checks from the driver layer.

Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@corigine.com>
Signed-off-by: Justin Chen <justin.chen@broadcom.com>
---
 net/ethtool/ioctl.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ethtool/ioctl.c b/net/ethtool/ioctl.c
index 6bb778e10461..80f456f83db0 100644
--- a/net/ethtool/ioctl.c
+++ b/net/ethtool/ioctl.c
@@ -1436,15 +1436,25 @@ static int ethtool_get_wol(struct net_device *dev, char __user *useraddr)
 
 static int ethtool_set_wol(struct net_device *dev, char __user *useraddr)
 {
-	struct ethtool_wolinfo wol;
+	struct ethtool_wolinfo wol, cur_wol;
 	int ret;
 
-	if (!dev->ethtool_ops->set_wol)
+	if (!dev->ethtool_ops->get_wol || !dev->ethtool_ops->set_wol)
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 
+	memset(&cur_wol, 0, sizeof(struct ethtool_wolinfo));
+	cur_wol.cmd = ETHTOOL_GWOL;
+	dev->ethtool_ops->get_wol(dev, &cur_wol);
+
 	if (copy_from_user(&wol, useraddr, sizeof(wol)))
 		return -EFAULT;
 
+	if (wol.wolopts & ~cur_wol.supported)
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
+	if (wol.wolopts == cur_wol.wolopts)
+		return 0;
+
 	ret = dev->ethtool_ops->set_wol(dev, &wol);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
-- 
2.7.4

Re: [PATCH net-next] ethtool: ioctl: improve error checking for set_wol
Posted by Jakub Kicinski 2 years, 8 months ago
On Mon,  5 Jun 2023 11:46:16 -0700 Justin Chen wrote:
> +	if (wol.wolopts & ~cur_wol.supported)
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;

One small comment - I think we should return -EINVAL here.
That's what netlink return and we seem to mostly return -EOPNOTSUPP
if the operation is completely not supported.
-- 
pw-bot: cr