Add counters for skipped, failed and redirected packets.
The xdp_hw_metadata program only redirects UDP port 9091.
This helps users to quickly identify then packets are
skipped and identify failures of bpf_xdp_adjust_meta.
Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
---
.../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c | 4 +++-
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c
index b0104763405a..a07ef7534013 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c
@@ -25,6 +25,10 @@ struct {
__type(value, __u32);
} xsk SEC(".maps");
+volatile __u64 pkts_skip = 0;
+volatile __u64 pkts_fail = 0;
+volatile __u64 pkts_redir = 0;
+
extern int bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_timestamp(const struct xdp_md *ctx,
__u64 *timestamp) __ksym;
extern int bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_hash(const struct xdp_md *ctx,
@@ -59,16 +63,21 @@ int rx(struct xdp_md *ctx)
udp = NULL;
}
- if (!udp)
+ if (!udp) {
+ pkts_skip++;
return XDP_PASS;
+ }
/* Forwarding UDP:9091 to AF_XDP */
- if (udp->dest != bpf_htons(9091))
+ if (udp->dest != bpf_htons(9091)) {
+ pkts_skip++;
return XDP_PASS;
+ }
ret = bpf_xdp_adjust_meta(ctx, -(int)sizeof(struct xdp_meta));
if (ret != 0) {
bpf_printk("bpf_xdp_adjust_meta returned %d", ret);
+ pkts_fail++;
return XDP_PASS;
}
@@ -78,6 +87,7 @@ int rx(struct xdp_md *ctx)
if (meta + 1 > data) {
bpf_printk("bpf_xdp_adjust_meta doesn't appear to work");
+ pkts_fail++;
return XDP_PASS;
}
@@ -91,6 +101,7 @@ int rx(struct xdp_md *ctx)
else
meta->rx_hash = 0; /* Used by AF_XDP as not avail signal */
+ pkts_redir++;
return bpf_redirect_map(&xsk, ctx->rx_queue_index, XDP_PASS);
}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c
index 1c8acb68b977..3b942ef7297b 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c
@@ -212,7 +212,9 @@ static int verify_metadata(struct xsk *rx_xsk, int rxq, int server_fd)
while (true) {
errno = 0;
ret = poll(fds, rxq + 1, 1000);
- printf("poll: %d (%d)\n", ret, errno);
+ printf("poll: %d (%d) skip=%llu fail=%llu redir=%llu\n",
+ ret, errno, bpf_obj->bss->pkts_skip,
+ bpf_obj->bss->pkts_fail, bpf_obj->bss->pkts_redir);
if (ret < 0)
break;
if (ret == 0)
On 04/12, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> Add counters for skipped, failed and redirected packets.
> The xdp_hw_metadata program only redirects UDP port 9091.
> This helps users to quickly identify then packets are
> skipped and identify failures of bpf_xdp_adjust_meta.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
> ---
> .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c | 4 +++-
> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c
> index b0104763405a..a07ef7534013 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c
> @@ -25,6 +25,10 @@ struct {
> __type(value, __u32);
> } xsk SEC(".maps");
>
> +volatile __u64 pkts_skip = 0;
> +volatile __u64 pkts_fail = 0;
> +volatile __u64 pkts_redir = 0;
> +
> extern int bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_timestamp(const struct xdp_md *ctx,
> __u64 *timestamp) __ksym;
> extern int bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_hash(const struct xdp_md *ctx,
> @@ -59,16 +63,21 @@ int rx(struct xdp_md *ctx)
> udp = NULL;
> }
>
> - if (!udp)
> + if (!udp) {
> + pkts_skip++;
> return XDP_PASS;
> + }
>
> /* Forwarding UDP:9091 to AF_XDP */
> - if (udp->dest != bpf_htons(9091))
> + if (udp->dest != bpf_htons(9091)) {
> + pkts_skip++;
> return XDP_PASS;
> + }
>
> ret = bpf_xdp_adjust_meta(ctx, -(int)sizeof(struct xdp_meta));
> if (ret != 0) {
[..]
> bpf_printk("bpf_xdp_adjust_meta returned %d", ret);
Maybe let's remove these completely? Merge patch 1 and 2, remove printk,
add counters. We can add more counters in the future if the existing
ones are not enough.. WDYT?
> + pkts_fail++;
> return XDP_PASS;
> }
>
> @@ -78,6 +87,7 @@ int rx(struct xdp_md *ctx)
>
> if (meta + 1 > data) {
> bpf_printk("bpf_xdp_adjust_meta doesn't appear to work");
> + pkts_fail++;
> return XDP_PASS;
> }
>
> @@ -91,6 +101,7 @@ int rx(struct xdp_md *ctx)
> else
> meta->rx_hash = 0; /* Used by AF_XDP as not avail signal */
>
> + pkts_redir++;
> return bpf_redirect_map(&xsk, ctx->rx_queue_index, XDP_PASS);
> }
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c
> index 1c8acb68b977..3b942ef7297b 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c
> @@ -212,7 +212,9 @@ static int verify_metadata(struct xsk *rx_xsk, int rxq, int server_fd)
> while (true) {
> errno = 0;
> ret = poll(fds, rxq + 1, 1000);
> - printf("poll: %d (%d)\n", ret, errno);
> + printf("poll: %d (%d) skip=%llu fail=%llu redir=%llu\n",
> + ret, errno, bpf_obj->bss->pkts_skip,
> + bpf_obj->bss->pkts_fail, bpf_obj->bss->pkts_redir);
> if (ret < 0)
> break;
> if (ret == 0)
>
>
On 12/04/2023 18.56, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> On 04/12, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
>> Add counters for skipped, failed and redirected packets.
>> The xdp_hw_metadata program only redirects UDP port 9091.
>> This helps users to quickly identify then packets are
>> skipped and identify failures of bpf_xdp_adjust_meta.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
>> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c | 4 +++-
>> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c
>> index b0104763405a..a07ef7534013 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c
>> @@ -25,6 +25,10 @@ struct {
>> __type(value, __u32);
>> } xsk SEC(".maps");
>>
>> +volatile __u64 pkts_skip = 0;
>> +volatile __u64 pkts_fail = 0;
>> +volatile __u64 pkts_redir = 0;
>> +
>> extern int bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_timestamp(const struct xdp_md *ctx,
>> __u64 *timestamp) __ksym;
>> extern int bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_hash(const struct xdp_md *ctx,
>> @@ -59,16 +63,21 @@ int rx(struct xdp_md *ctx)
>> udp = NULL;
>> }
>>
>> - if (!udp)
>> + if (!udp) {
>> + pkts_skip++;
>> return XDP_PASS;
>> + }
>>
>> /* Forwarding UDP:9091 to AF_XDP */
>> - if (udp->dest != bpf_htons(9091))
>> + if (udp->dest != bpf_htons(9091)) {
>> + pkts_skip++;
>> return XDP_PASS;
>> + }
>>
>> ret = bpf_xdp_adjust_meta(ctx, -(int)sizeof(struct xdp_meta));
>> if (ret != 0) {
>
> [..]
>
>> bpf_printk("bpf_xdp_adjust_meta returned %d", ret);
>
> Maybe let's remove these completely? Merge patch 1 and 2, remove printk,
> add counters. We can add more counters in the future if the existing
> ones are not enough.. WDYT?
>
Sure, lets just remove all of the bpf_printk, and add these counter instead.
Rolling V9.
>> + pkts_fail++;
This fail counter should be enough for driver devel to realize that they
also need to implement/setup XDP metadata pointers correctly (for
bpf_xdp_adjust_meta to work).
>> return XDP_PASS;
>> }
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 10:52 AM Jesper Dangaard Brouer
<jbrouer@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 12/04/2023 18.56, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > On 04/12, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> >> Add counters for skipped, failed and redirected packets.
> >> The xdp_hw_metadata program only redirects UDP port 9091.
> >> This helps users to quickly identify then packets are
> >> skipped and identify failures of bpf_xdp_adjust_meta.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
> >> ---
> >> .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
> >> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c | 4 +++-
> >> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c
> >> index b0104763405a..a07ef7534013 100644
> >> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c
> >> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c
> >> @@ -25,6 +25,10 @@ struct {
> >> __type(value, __u32);
> >> } xsk SEC(".maps");
> >>
> >> +volatile __u64 pkts_skip = 0;
> >> +volatile __u64 pkts_fail = 0;
> >> +volatile __u64 pkts_redir = 0;
> >> +
> >> extern int bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_timestamp(const struct xdp_md *ctx,
> >> __u64 *timestamp) __ksym;
> >> extern int bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_hash(const struct xdp_md *ctx,
> >> @@ -59,16 +63,21 @@ int rx(struct xdp_md *ctx)
> >> udp = NULL;
> >> }
> >>
> >> - if (!udp)
> >> + if (!udp) {
> >> + pkts_skip++;
> >> return XDP_PASS;
> >> + }
> >>
> >> /* Forwarding UDP:9091 to AF_XDP */
> >> - if (udp->dest != bpf_htons(9091))
> >> + if (udp->dest != bpf_htons(9091)) {
> >> + pkts_skip++;
> >> return XDP_PASS;
> >> + }
> >>
> >> ret = bpf_xdp_adjust_meta(ctx, -(int)sizeof(struct xdp_meta));
> >> if (ret != 0) {
> >
> > [..]
> >
> >> bpf_printk("bpf_xdp_adjust_meta returned %d", ret);
> >
> > Maybe let's remove these completely? Merge patch 1 and 2, remove printk,
> > add counters. We can add more counters in the future if the existing
> > ones are not enough.. WDYT?
> >
>
> Sure, lets just remove all of the bpf_printk, and add these counter instead.
> Rolling V9.
>
> >> + pkts_fail++;
>
> This fail counter should be enough for driver devel to realize that they
> also need to implement/setup XDP metadata pointers correctly (for
> bpf_xdp_adjust_meta to work).
Agreed. As long as we have a clear signal "something's not working"
(instead of failing silently), that should be enough to get to the
bottom of it..
> >> return XDP_PASS;
> >> }
>
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.