[PATCH 0/2] ASoC: rt9120: Fix 3byte read logic and optimize 'PWDN' control

cy_huang posted 2 patches 3 years, 11 months ago
sound/soc/codecs/rt9120.c | 113 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 106 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
[PATCH 0/2] ASoC: rt9120: Fix 3byte read logic and optimize 'PWDN' control
Posted by cy_huang 3 years, 11 months ago
From: ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@richtek.com>

Hi,

This patch series try to fix two things.
- 3byte read logic bug
- Use regcache and pm_runtime to optimize 'PWDN' control

ChiYuan Huang (2):
  ASoC: rt9120: Fix 3byte read, valule offset typo
  ASoC: rt9120: Use pm_runtime and regcache to optimize 'pwdnn' logic

 sound/soc/codecs/rt9120.c | 113 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 106 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

-- 
2.7.4
Re: [PATCH 0/2] ASoC: rt9120: Fix 3byte read logic and optimize 'PWDN' control
Posted by Mark Brown 3 years, 11 months ago
On Thu, 19 May 2022 10:13:36 +0800, cy_huang wrote:
> From: ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@richtek.com>
> 
> Hi,
> 
> This patch series try to fix two things.
> - 3byte read logic bug
> - Use regcache and pm_runtime to optimize 'PWDN' control
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/2] ASoC: rt9120: Fix 3byte read, valule offset typo
      commit: 57f68f2168988e574133fb5abcd73949bf1d1df2
[2/2] ASoC: rt9120: Use pm_runtime and regcache to optimize 'pwdnn' logic
      commit: 80b949f332e331b67c3ae4f323daf2cb91e743e5

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark