[PATCH v6,2/4] drm/mediatek: Separate poweron/poweroff from enable/disable and define new funcs

xinlei.lee@mediatek.com posted 1 patch 2 years, 4 months ago
There is a newer version of this series
drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
[PATCH v6,2/4] drm/mediatek: Separate poweron/poweroff from enable/disable and define new funcs
Posted by xinlei.lee@mediatek.com 2 years, 4 months ago
From: Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@mediatek.com>

In order to match the changes of "Use the drm_panel_bridge API",
the poweron/poweroff of dsi is extracted from enable/disable and
defined as new funcs (atomic_pre_enable/atomic_post_disable).

Fixes: 2dd8075d2185 ("drm/mediatek: mtk_dsi: Use the drm_panel_bridge API")

Signed-off-by: Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@mediatek.com>
Signed-off-by: Xinlei Lee <xinlei.lee@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Rex-BC Chen <rex-bc.chen@mediatek.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
index f880136cec09..d9a6b928dba8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
@@ -691,16 +691,6 @@ static void mtk_dsi_poweroff(struct mtk_dsi *dsi)
 	if (--dsi->refcount != 0)
 		return;
 
-	/*
-	 * mtk_dsi_stop() and mtk_dsi_start() is asymmetric, since
-	 * mtk_dsi_stop() should be called after mtk_drm_crtc_atomic_disable(),
-	 * which needs irq for vblank, and mtk_dsi_stop() will disable irq.
-	 * mtk_dsi_start() needs to be called in mtk_output_dsi_enable(),
-	 * after dsi is fully set.
-	 */
-	mtk_dsi_stop(dsi);
-
-	mtk_dsi_switch_to_cmd_mode(dsi, VM_DONE_INT_FLAG, 500);
 	mtk_dsi_reset_engine(dsi);
 	mtk_dsi_lane0_ulp_mode_enter(dsi);
 	mtk_dsi_clk_ulp_mode_enter(dsi);
@@ -715,17 +705,9 @@ static void mtk_dsi_poweroff(struct mtk_dsi *dsi)
 
 static void mtk_output_dsi_enable(struct mtk_dsi *dsi)
 {
-	int ret;
-
 	if (dsi->enabled)
 		return;
 
-	ret = mtk_dsi_poweron(dsi);
-	if (ret < 0) {
-		DRM_ERROR("failed to power on dsi\n");
-		return;
-	}
-
 	mtk_dsi_set_mode(dsi);
 	mtk_dsi_clk_hs_mode(dsi, 1);
 
@@ -739,7 +721,16 @@ static void mtk_output_dsi_disable(struct mtk_dsi *dsi)
 	if (!dsi->enabled)
 		return;
 
-	mtk_dsi_poweroff(dsi);
+	/*
+	 * mtk_dsi_stop() and mtk_dsi_start() is asymmetric, since
+	 * mtk_dsi_stop() should be called after mtk_drm_crtc_atomic_disable(),
+	 * which needs irq for vblank, and mtk_dsi_stop() will disable irq.
+	 * mtk_dsi_start() needs to be called in mtk_output_dsi_enable(),
+	 * after dsi is fully set.
+	 */
+	mtk_dsi_stop(dsi);
+
+	mtk_dsi_switch_to_cmd_mode(dsi, VM_DONE_INT_FLAG, 500);
 
 	dsi->enabled = false;
 }
@@ -776,13 +767,37 @@ static void mtk_dsi_bridge_atomic_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
 {
 	struct mtk_dsi *dsi = bridge_to_dsi(bridge);
 
+	if (dsi->refcount == 0)
+		return;
+
 	mtk_output_dsi_enable(dsi);
 }
 
+static void mtk_dsi_bridge_atomic_pre_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
+					     struct drm_bridge_state *old_bridge_state)
+{
+	struct mtk_dsi *dsi = bridge_to_dsi(bridge);
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = mtk_dsi_poweron(dsi);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		DRM_ERROR("failed to power on dsi\n");
+}
+
+static void mtk_dsi_bridge_atomic_post_disable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
+					       struct drm_bridge_state *old_bridge_state)
+{
+	struct mtk_dsi *dsi = bridge_to_dsi(bridge);
+
+	mtk_dsi_poweroff(dsi);
+}
+
 static const struct drm_bridge_funcs mtk_dsi_bridge_funcs = {
 	.attach = mtk_dsi_bridge_attach,
 	.atomic_disable = mtk_dsi_bridge_atomic_disable,
 	.atomic_enable = mtk_dsi_bridge_atomic_enable,
+	.atomic_pre_enable = mtk_dsi_bridge_atomic_pre_enable,
+	.atomic_post_disable = mtk_dsi_bridge_atomic_post_disable,
 	.mode_set = mtk_dsi_bridge_mode_set,
 };
 
-- 
2.18.0
Re: [PATCH v6, 2/4] drm/mediatek: Separate poweron/poweroff from enable/disable and define new funcs
Posted by CK Hu 2 years, 4 months ago
Hi, Xinlei:

On Thu, 2022-05-12 at 14:30 +0800, xinlei.lee@mediatek.com wrote:
> From: Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@mediatek.com>
> 
> In order to match the changes of "Use the drm_panel_bridge API",
> the poweron/poweroff of dsi is extracted from enable/disable and
> defined as new funcs (atomic_pre_enable/atomic_post_disable).
> 
> Fixes: 2dd8075d2185 ("drm/mediatek: mtk_dsi: Use the drm_panel_bridge
> API")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@mediatek.com>
> Signed-off-by: Xinlei Lee <xinlei.lee@mediatek.com>
> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <
> angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
> Reviewed-by: Rex-BC Chen <rex-bc.chen@mediatek.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++---------
> --
>  1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> index f880136cec09..d9a6b928dba8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> @@ -691,16 +691,6 @@ static void mtk_dsi_poweroff(struct mtk_dsi
> *dsi)
>  	if (--dsi->refcount != 0)
>  		return;
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * mtk_dsi_stop() and mtk_dsi_start() is asymmetric, since
> -	 * mtk_dsi_stop() should be called after
> mtk_drm_crtc_atomic_disable(),
> -	 * which needs irq for vblank, and mtk_dsi_stop() will disable
> irq.
> -	 * mtk_dsi_start() needs to be called in
> mtk_output_dsi_enable(),
> -	 * after dsi is fully set.
> -	 */
> -	mtk_dsi_stop(dsi);
> -
> -	mtk_dsi_switch_to_cmd_mode(dsi, VM_DONE_INT_FLAG, 500);
>  	mtk_dsi_reset_engine(dsi);
>  	mtk_dsi_lane0_ulp_mode_enter(dsi);
>  	mtk_dsi_clk_ulp_mode_enter(dsi);
> @@ -715,17 +705,9 @@ static void mtk_dsi_poweroff(struct mtk_dsi
> *dsi)
>  
>  static void mtk_output_dsi_enable(struct mtk_dsi *dsi)
>  {
> -	int ret;
> -
>  	if (dsi->enabled)
>  		return;
>  
> -	ret = mtk_dsi_poweron(dsi);
> -	if (ret < 0) {
> -		DRM_ERROR("failed to power on dsi\n");
> -		return;
> -	}
> -
>  	mtk_dsi_set_mode(dsi);
>  	mtk_dsi_clk_hs_mode(dsi, 1);
>  
> @@ -739,7 +721,16 @@ static void mtk_output_dsi_disable(struct
> mtk_dsi *dsi)
>  	if (!dsi->enabled)
>  		return;
>  
> -	mtk_dsi_poweroff(dsi);
> +	/*
> +	 * mtk_dsi_stop() and mtk_dsi_start() is asymmetric, since
> +	 * mtk_dsi_stop() should be called after
> mtk_drm_crtc_atomic_disable(),
> +	 * which needs irq for vblank, and mtk_dsi_stop() will disable
> irq.
> +	 * mtk_dsi_start() needs to be called in
> mtk_output_dsi_enable(),
> +	 * after dsi is fully set.
> +	 */
> +	mtk_dsi_stop(dsi);
> +
> +	mtk_dsi_switch_to_cmd_mode(dsi, VM_DONE_INT_FLAG, 500);
>  
>  	dsi->enabled = false;
>  }
> @@ -776,13 +767,37 @@ static void mtk_dsi_bridge_atomic_enable(struct
> drm_bridge *bridge,
>  {
>  	struct mtk_dsi *dsi = bridge_to_dsi(bridge);
>  
> +	if (dsi->refcount == 0)
> +		return;

This seems not related to pre_enable()/post_disable(). So separate this
to another patch.

Regards,
CK

> +
>  	mtk_output_dsi_enable(dsi);
>  }
>  
> +static void mtk_dsi_bridge_atomic_pre_enable(struct drm_bridge
> *bridge,
> +					     struct drm_bridge_state
> *old_bridge_state)
> +{
> +	struct mtk_dsi *dsi = bridge_to_dsi(bridge);
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = mtk_dsi_poweron(dsi);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		DRM_ERROR("failed to power on dsi\n");
> +}
> +
> +static void mtk_dsi_bridge_atomic_post_disable(struct drm_bridge
> *bridge,
> +					       struct drm_bridge_state
> *old_bridge_state)
> +{
> +	struct mtk_dsi *dsi = bridge_to_dsi(bridge);
> +
> +	mtk_dsi_poweroff(dsi);
> +}
> +
>  static const struct drm_bridge_funcs mtk_dsi_bridge_funcs = {
>  	.attach = mtk_dsi_bridge_attach,
>  	.atomic_disable = mtk_dsi_bridge_atomic_disable,
>  	.atomic_enable = mtk_dsi_bridge_atomic_enable,
> +	.atomic_pre_enable = mtk_dsi_bridge_atomic_pre_enable,
> +	.atomic_post_disable = mtk_dsi_bridge_atomic_post_disable,
>  	.mode_set = mtk_dsi_bridge_mode_set,
>  };
>