[PATCH V3] s390: Simplify the calculation of variables

Haowen Bai posted 1 patch 4 years, 2 months ago
arch/s390/include/asm/scsw.h | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 64 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
[PATCH V3] s390: Simplify the calculation of variables
Posted by Haowen Bai 4 years, 2 months ago
Fix the following coccicheck warnings:
./arch/s390/include/asm/scsw.h:695:47-49: WARNING
 !A || A && B is equivalent to !A || B

I apply a readable version just to get rid of a warning.

Signed-off-by: Haowen Bai <baihaowen@meizu.com>
---
V1->V2: apply a readable and simple version as suggestion.
V2->V3: scsw->tm instead of scsw->cmd; fix logic flow as suggestion.

 arch/s390/include/asm/scsw.h | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 64 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/scsw.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/scsw.h
index a7c3ccf681da..5cb893706d66 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/scsw.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/scsw.h
@@ -508,9 +508,21 @@ static inline int scsw_cmd_is_valid_zcc(union scsw *scsw)
  */
 static inline int scsw_cmd_is_valid_ectl(union scsw *scsw)
 {
-	return (scsw->cmd.stctl & SCSW_STCTL_STATUS_PEND) &&
-	       !(scsw->cmd.stctl & SCSW_STCTL_INTER_STATUS) &&
-	       (scsw->cmd.stctl & SCSW_STCTL_ALERT_STATUS);
+	/* Must be status pending. */
+	if (!(scsw->cmd.stctl & SCSW_STCTL_STATUS_PEND))
+		return 0;
+
+	/* Must have alert status. */
+	if (!(scsw->cmd.stctl & SCSW_STCTL_ALERT_STATUS))
+		return 0;
+
+	/* Must be alone or together with primary, secondary or both,
+	 * => no intermediate status.
+	 */
+	if (scsw->cmd.stctl & SCSW_STCTL_INTER_STATUS)
+		return 0;
+
+	return 1;
 }
 
 /**
@@ -522,10 +533,25 @@ static inline int scsw_cmd_is_valid_ectl(union scsw *scsw)
  */
 static inline int scsw_cmd_is_valid_pno(union scsw *scsw)
 {
-	return (scsw->cmd.fctl != 0) &&
-	       (scsw->cmd.stctl & SCSW_STCTL_STATUS_PEND) &&
-	       (!(scsw->cmd.stctl & SCSW_STCTL_INTER_STATUS) ||
-		  (scsw->cmd.actl & SCSW_ACTL_SUSPENDED));
+	/* Must indicate at least one I/O function. */
+	if (!scsw->cmd.fctl)
+		return 0;
+
+	/* Must be status pending. */
+	if (!(scsw->cmd.stctl & SCSW_STCTL_STATUS_PEND))
+		return 0;
+
+	/* Can be status pending alone, or with any combination of primary,
+	 * secondary and alert => no intermediate status.
+	 */
+	if (!(scsw->cmd.stctl & SCSW_STCTL_INTER_STATUS))
+		return 1;
+
+	/* If intermediate, must be suspended. */
+	if (scsw->cmd.actl & SCSW_ACTL_SUSPENDED)
+		return 1;
+
+	return 0;
 }
 
 /**
@@ -675,9 +700,21 @@ static inline int scsw_tm_is_valid_q(union scsw *scsw)
  */
 static inline int scsw_tm_is_valid_ectl(union scsw *scsw)
 {
-	return (scsw->tm.stctl & SCSW_STCTL_STATUS_PEND) &&
-	       !(scsw->tm.stctl & SCSW_STCTL_INTER_STATUS) &&
-	       (scsw->tm.stctl & SCSW_STCTL_ALERT_STATUS);
+	/* Must be status pending. */
+	if (!(scsw->tm.stctl & SCSW_STCTL_STATUS_PEND))
+		return 0;
+
+	/* Must have alert status. */
+	if (!(scsw->tm.stctl & SCSW_STCTL_ALERT_STATUS))
+		return 0;
+
+	/* Must be alone or together with primary, secondary or both,
+	 * => no intermediate status.
+	 */
+	if (scsw->tm.stctl & SCSW_STCTL_INTER_STATUS)
+		return 0;
+
+	return 1;
 }
 
 /**
@@ -689,11 +725,25 @@ static inline int scsw_tm_is_valid_ectl(union scsw *scsw)
  */
 static inline int scsw_tm_is_valid_pno(union scsw *scsw)
 {
-	return (scsw->tm.fctl != 0) &&
-	       (scsw->tm.stctl & SCSW_STCTL_STATUS_PEND) &&
-	       (!(scsw->tm.stctl & SCSW_STCTL_INTER_STATUS) ||
-		 ((scsw->tm.stctl & SCSW_STCTL_INTER_STATUS) &&
-		  (scsw->tm.actl & SCSW_ACTL_SUSPENDED)));
+	/* Must indicate at least one I/O function. */
+	if (!scsw->tm.fctl)
+		return 0;
+
+	/* Must be status pending. */
+	if (!(scsw->tm.stctl & SCSW_STCTL_STATUS_PEND))
+		return 0;
+
+	/* Can be status pending alone, or with any combination of primary,
+	 * secondary and alert => no intermediate status.
+	 */
+	if (!(scsw->tm.stctl & SCSW_STCTL_INTER_STATUS))
+		return 1;
+
+	/* If intermediate, must be suspended. */
+	if (scsw->tm.actl & SCSW_ACTL_SUSPENDED)
+		return 1;
+
+	return 0;
 }
 
 /**
-- 
2.7.4
Re: [PATCH V3] s390: Simplify the calculation of variables
Posted by Peter Oberparleiter 4 years, 2 months ago
On 07.04.2022 04:16, Haowen Bai wrote:
> Fix the following coccicheck warnings:
> ./arch/s390/include/asm/scsw.h:695:47-49: WARNING
>  !A || A && B is equivalent to !A || B
> 
> I apply a readable version just to get rid of a warning.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Haowen Bai <baihaowen@meizu.com>

A definitive improvement over the current version. Thanks!

Reviewed-by: Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>


-- 
Peter Oberparleiter
Linux on IBM Z Development - IBM Germany R&D
Re: [PATCH V3] s390: Simplify the calculation of variables
Posted by Heiko Carstens 4 years, 2 months ago
On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 02:53:02PM +0200, Peter Oberparleiter wrote:
> On 07.04.2022 04:16, Haowen Bai wrote:
> > Fix the following coccicheck warnings:
> > ./arch/s390/include/asm/scsw.h:695:47-49: WARNING
> >  !A || A && B is equivalent to !A || B
> > 
> > I apply a readable version just to get rid of a warning.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Haowen Bai <baihaowen@meizu.com>
> 
> A definitive improvement over the current version. Thanks!
> 
> Reviewed-by: Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>

Applied, thanks!