arch/s390/include/asm/scsw.h | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 64 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
Fix the following coccicheck warnings:
./arch/s390/include/asm/scsw.h:695:47-49: WARNING
!A || A && B is equivalent to !A || B
I apply a readable version just to get rid of a warning.
Signed-off-by: Haowen Bai <baihaowen@meizu.com>
---
V1->V2: apply a readable and simple version as suggestion.
V2->V3: scsw->tm instead of scsw->cmd; fix logic flow as suggestion.
arch/s390/include/asm/scsw.h | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 64 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/scsw.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/scsw.h
index a7c3ccf681da..5cb893706d66 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/scsw.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/scsw.h
@@ -508,9 +508,21 @@ static inline int scsw_cmd_is_valid_zcc(union scsw *scsw)
*/
static inline int scsw_cmd_is_valid_ectl(union scsw *scsw)
{
- return (scsw->cmd.stctl & SCSW_STCTL_STATUS_PEND) &&
- !(scsw->cmd.stctl & SCSW_STCTL_INTER_STATUS) &&
- (scsw->cmd.stctl & SCSW_STCTL_ALERT_STATUS);
+ /* Must be status pending. */
+ if (!(scsw->cmd.stctl & SCSW_STCTL_STATUS_PEND))
+ return 0;
+
+ /* Must have alert status. */
+ if (!(scsw->cmd.stctl & SCSW_STCTL_ALERT_STATUS))
+ return 0;
+
+ /* Must be alone or together with primary, secondary or both,
+ * => no intermediate status.
+ */
+ if (scsw->cmd.stctl & SCSW_STCTL_INTER_STATUS)
+ return 0;
+
+ return 1;
}
/**
@@ -522,10 +533,25 @@ static inline int scsw_cmd_is_valid_ectl(union scsw *scsw)
*/
static inline int scsw_cmd_is_valid_pno(union scsw *scsw)
{
- return (scsw->cmd.fctl != 0) &&
- (scsw->cmd.stctl & SCSW_STCTL_STATUS_PEND) &&
- (!(scsw->cmd.stctl & SCSW_STCTL_INTER_STATUS) ||
- (scsw->cmd.actl & SCSW_ACTL_SUSPENDED));
+ /* Must indicate at least one I/O function. */
+ if (!scsw->cmd.fctl)
+ return 0;
+
+ /* Must be status pending. */
+ if (!(scsw->cmd.stctl & SCSW_STCTL_STATUS_PEND))
+ return 0;
+
+ /* Can be status pending alone, or with any combination of primary,
+ * secondary and alert => no intermediate status.
+ */
+ if (!(scsw->cmd.stctl & SCSW_STCTL_INTER_STATUS))
+ return 1;
+
+ /* If intermediate, must be suspended. */
+ if (scsw->cmd.actl & SCSW_ACTL_SUSPENDED)
+ return 1;
+
+ return 0;
}
/**
@@ -675,9 +700,21 @@ static inline int scsw_tm_is_valid_q(union scsw *scsw)
*/
static inline int scsw_tm_is_valid_ectl(union scsw *scsw)
{
- return (scsw->tm.stctl & SCSW_STCTL_STATUS_PEND) &&
- !(scsw->tm.stctl & SCSW_STCTL_INTER_STATUS) &&
- (scsw->tm.stctl & SCSW_STCTL_ALERT_STATUS);
+ /* Must be status pending. */
+ if (!(scsw->tm.stctl & SCSW_STCTL_STATUS_PEND))
+ return 0;
+
+ /* Must have alert status. */
+ if (!(scsw->tm.stctl & SCSW_STCTL_ALERT_STATUS))
+ return 0;
+
+ /* Must be alone or together with primary, secondary or both,
+ * => no intermediate status.
+ */
+ if (scsw->tm.stctl & SCSW_STCTL_INTER_STATUS)
+ return 0;
+
+ return 1;
}
/**
@@ -689,11 +725,25 @@ static inline int scsw_tm_is_valid_ectl(union scsw *scsw)
*/
static inline int scsw_tm_is_valid_pno(union scsw *scsw)
{
- return (scsw->tm.fctl != 0) &&
- (scsw->tm.stctl & SCSW_STCTL_STATUS_PEND) &&
- (!(scsw->tm.stctl & SCSW_STCTL_INTER_STATUS) ||
- ((scsw->tm.stctl & SCSW_STCTL_INTER_STATUS) &&
- (scsw->tm.actl & SCSW_ACTL_SUSPENDED)));
+ /* Must indicate at least one I/O function. */
+ if (!scsw->tm.fctl)
+ return 0;
+
+ /* Must be status pending. */
+ if (!(scsw->tm.stctl & SCSW_STCTL_STATUS_PEND))
+ return 0;
+
+ /* Can be status pending alone, or with any combination of primary,
+ * secondary and alert => no intermediate status.
+ */
+ if (!(scsw->tm.stctl & SCSW_STCTL_INTER_STATUS))
+ return 1;
+
+ /* If intermediate, must be suspended. */
+ if (scsw->tm.actl & SCSW_ACTL_SUSPENDED)
+ return 1;
+
+ return 0;
}
/**
--
2.7.4
On 07.04.2022 04:16, Haowen Bai wrote: > Fix the following coccicheck warnings: > ./arch/s390/include/asm/scsw.h:695:47-49: WARNING > !A || A && B is equivalent to !A || B > > I apply a readable version just to get rid of a warning. > > Signed-off-by: Haowen Bai <baihaowen@meizu.com> A definitive improvement over the current version. Thanks! Reviewed-by: Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com> -- Peter Oberparleiter Linux on IBM Z Development - IBM Germany R&D
On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 02:53:02PM +0200, Peter Oberparleiter wrote: > On 07.04.2022 04:16, Haowen Bai wrote: > > Fix the following coccicheck warnings: > > ./arch/s390/include/asm/scsw.h:695:47-49: WARNING > > !A || A && B is equivalent to !A || B > > > > I apply a readable version just to get rid of a warning. > > > > Signed-off-by: Haowen Bai <baihaowen@meizu.com> > > A definitive improvement over the current version. Thanks! > > Reviewed-by: Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com> Applied, thanks!
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.