Hi All, Applying this series will cause power.no_pm to be set for faux devices (so they don't get processed unnecessarily during system-wide suspend/resume transitions) and power.no_callbacks to be set along with power.no_pm (for consistency). Thanks!
On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 12:55:50PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Hi All, > > Applying this series will cause power.no_pm to be set for faux devices (so they > don't get processed unnecessarily during system-wide suspend/resume transitions) > and power.no_callbacks to be set along with power.no_pm (for consistency). > Nice, even I hadn't noticed about these before. The changes looks good to me. Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> -- Regards, Sudeep
On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 12:55:50PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Hi All, > > Applying this series will cause power.no_pm to be set for faux devices (so they > don't get processed unnecessarily during system-wide suspend/resume transitions) > and power.no_callbacks to be set along with power.no_pm (for consistency). Oh, nice! I forgot about that entirely. Should these be backported to older kernels as well? thanks, greg k-h
On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 1:07 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 12:55:50PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > Applying this series will cause power.no_pm to be set for faux devices (so they > > don't get processed unnecessarily during system-wide suspend/resume transitions) > > and power.no_callbacks to be set along with power.no_pm (for consistency). > > Oh, nice! I forgot about that entirely. Should these be backported to > older kernels as well? Doing it shouldn't hurt. Cheers, Rafael
On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 1:20 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 1:07 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman > <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 12:55:50PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > > > Applying this series will cause power.no_pm to be set for faux devices (so they > > > don't get processed unnecessarily during system-wide suspend/resume transitions) > > > and power.no_callbacks to be set along with power.no_pm (for consistency). > > > > Oh, nice! I forgot about that entirely. Should these be backported to > > older kernels as well? So do you want me to resend these patches with suitable Cc: stable tags? Alternatively, I can just apply them with the tags and route them through my tree, whatever you prefer.
On Fri, Aug 29, 2025 at 9:09 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 1:20 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 1:07 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman > > <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 12:55:50PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > > > Applying this series will cause power.no_pm to be set for faux devices (so they > > > > don't get processed unnecessarily during system-wide suspend/resume transitions) > > > > and power.no_callbacks to be set along with power.no_pm (for consistency). > > > > > > Oh, nice! I forgot about that entirely. Should these be backported to > > > older kernels as well? > > So do you want me to resend these patches with suitable Cc: stable tags? > > Alternatively, I can just apply them with the tags and route them > through my tree, whatever you prefer. In the absence of more feedback, this is what I'm going to do.
On Wed, Sep 03, 2025 at 01:33:18PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Fri, Aug 29, 2025 at 9:09 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 1:20 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 1:07 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman > > > <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 12:55:50PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > > > > > Applying this series will cause power.no_pm to be set for faux devices (so they > > > > > don't get processed unnecessarily during system-wide suspend/resume transitions) > > > > > and power.no_callbacks to be set along with power.no_pm (for consistency). > > > > > > > > Oh, nice! I forgot about that entirely. Should these be backported to > > > > older kernels as well? > > > > So do you want me to resend these patches with suitable Cc: stable tags? > > > > Alternatively, I can just apply them with the tags and route them > > through my tree, whatever you prefer. > > In the absence of more feedback, this is what I'm going to do. Thanks, sorry for the delay, been swamped with conferences and travel :(
On Sat, Sep 06, 2025 at 01:53:11PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Wed, Sep 03, 2025 at 01:33:18PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 29, 2025 at 9:09 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 1:20 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 1:07 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman > > > > <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 12:55:50PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > > > > > > > Applying this series will cause power.no_pm to be set for faux devices (so they > > > > > > don't get processed unnecessarily during system-wide suspend/resume transitions) > > > > > > and power.no_callbacks to be set along with power.no_pm (for consistency). > > > > > > > > > > Oh, nice! I forgot about that entirely. Should these be backported to > > > > > older kernels as well? > > > > > > So do you want me to resend these patches with suitable Cc: stable tags? > > > > > > Alternatively, I can just apply them with the tags and route them > > > through my tree, whatever you prefer. > > > > In the absence of more feedback, this is what I'm going to do. > > Thanks, sorry for the delay, been swamped with conferences and travel :( Wait, I can take them right now, no need to resend them. greg k-h
On Sat, Sep 6, 2025 at 1:54 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 06, 2025 at 01:53:11PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 03, 2025 at 01:33:18PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 29, 2025 at 9:09 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 1:20 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 1:07 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman > > > > > <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 12:55:50PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Applying this series will cause power.no_pm to be set for faux devices (so they > > > > > > > don't get processed unnecessarily during system-wide suspend/resume transitions) > > > > > > > and power.no_callbacks to be set along with power.no_pm (for consistency). > > > > > > > > > > > > Oh, nice! I forgot about that entirely. Should these be backported to > > > > > > older kernels as well? > > > > > > > > So do you want me to resend these patches with suitable Cc: stable tags? > > > > > > > > Alternatively, I can just apply them with the tags and route them > > > > through my tree, whatever you prefer. > > > > > > In the absence of more feedback, this is what I'm going to do. > > > > Thanks, sorry for the delay, been swamped with conferences and travel :( No worries. > Wait, I can take them right now, no need to resend them. Cool, thanks!
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.