drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
On Sunday, April 13, 2025 4:44:56 PM CEST srinivas pandruvada wrote:
> On Sat, 2025-04-12 at 18:34 +0800, Xi Ruoyao wrote:
> > Use raw_smp_processor_id() instead of plain smp_processor_id() in
> > hwp_get_cpu_scaling(), otherwise we get some errors on a Lenovo
> > Thinkpad
> > T14P Gen 2:
> >
> > BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code:
> > swapper/0/1
> > caller is hwp_get_cpu_scaling+0x7f/0xc0
> >
> > Fixes: b52aaeeadfac ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: Avoid SMP calls to get
> > cpu-type")
> > Signed-off-by: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>
>
> Acked-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
It's still broken after this patch though because the function should
use the cpu_data() of the target CPU and not of the CPU running the code.
The patch below should fix it.
===
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Fix hwp_get_cpu_scaling()
Commit b52aaeeadfac ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: Avoid SMP calls to get
cpu-type") introduced two issues into hwp_get_cpu_scaling(). First,
it made that function use the CPU type of the CPU running the code
even though the target CPU is passed as the argument to it and second,
it used smp_processor_id() for that even though hwp_get_cpu_scaling()
runs in preemptible context.
Fix both of these problems by simply passing "cpu" to cpu_data().
Fixes: b52aaeeadfac ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: Avoid SMP calls to get cpu-type")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20250412103434.5321-1-xry111@xry111.site/
Reported-by: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
@@ -2336,7 +2336,7 @@
static int hwp_get_cpu_scaling(int cpu)
{
if (hybrid_scaling_factor) {
- struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(smp_processor_id());
+ struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu);
u8 cpu_type = c->topo.intel_type;
/*
On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 05:19:04PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Sunday, April 13, 2025 4:44:56 PM CEST srinivas pandruvada wrote:
> > On Sat, 2025-04-12 at 18:34 +0800, Xi Ruoyao wrote:
> > > Use raw_smp_processor_id() instead of plain smp_processor_id() in
> > > hwp_get_cpu_scaling(), otherwise we get some errors on a Lenovo
> > > Thinkpad
> > > T14P Gen 2:
> > >
> > > BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code:
> > > swapper/0/1
> > > caller is hwp_get_cpu_scaling+0x7f/0xc0
> > >
> > > Fixes: b52aaeeadfac ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: Avoid SMP calls to get
> > > cpu-type")
> > > Signed-off-by: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>
> >
> > Acked-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
>
> It's still broken after this patch though because the function should
> use the cpu_data() of the target CPU and not of the CPU running the code.
Sorry for missing that.
I noticed that find_hybrid_pmu_for_cpu() doesn't take the cpu argument.
Does it suffer from the same problem?
init_hybrid_pmu(int cpu)
{
struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = &per_cpu(cpu_hw_events, cpu);
struct x86_hybrid_pmu *pmu = find_hybrid_pmu_for_cpu();
On Mon, 2025-04-14 at 17:19 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Sunday, April 13, 2025 4:44:56 PM CEST srinivas pandruvada wrote:
> > On Sat, 2025-04-12 at 18:34 +0800, Xi Ruoyao wrote:
> > > Use raw_smp_processor_id() instead of plain smp_processor_id() in
> > > hwp_get_cpu_scaling(), otherwise we get some errors on a Lenovo
> > > Thinkpad
> > > T14P Gen 2:
> > >
> > > BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code:
> > > swapper/0/1
> > > caller is hwp_get_cpu_scaling+0x7f/0xc0
> > >
> > > Fixes: b52aaeeadfac ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: Avoid SMP calls to
> > > get
> > > cpu-type")
> > > Signed-off-by: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>
> >
> > Acked-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
>
> It's still broken after this patch though because the function should
> use the cpu_data() of the target CPU and not of the CPU running the
> code.
That is correct. The below patch should work.
Thanks,
Srinivas
>
> The patch below should fix it.
>
> ===
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v1] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Fix hwp_get_cpu_scaling()
>
> Commit b52aaeeadfac ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: Avoid SMP calls to get
> cpu-type") introduced two issues into hwp_get_cpu_scaling(). First,
> it made that function use the CPU type of the CPU running the code
> even though the target CPU is passed as the argument to it and
> second,
> it used smp_processor_id() for that even though hwp_get_cpu_scaling()
> runs in preemptible context.
>
> Fix both of these problems by simply passing "cpu" to cpu_data().
>
> Fixes: b52aaeeadfac ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: Avoid SMP calls to get
> cpu-type")
> Link:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20250412103434.5321-1-xry111@xry111.site/
> Reported-by: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> @@ -2336,7 +2336,7 @@
> static int hwp_get_cpu_scaling(int cpu)
> {
> if (hybrid_scaling_factor) {
> - struct cpuinfo_x86 *c =
> &cpu_data(smp_processor_id());
> + struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu);
> u8 cpu_type = c->topo.intel_type;
>
> /*
>
>
>
>
On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 5:26 PM srinivas pandruvada
<srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2025-04-14 at 17:19 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Sunday, April 13, 2025 4:44:56 PM CEST srinivas pandruvada wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2025-04-12 at 18:34 +0800, Xi Ruoyao wrote:
> > > > Use raw_smp_processor_id() instead of plain smp_processor_id() in
> > > > hwp_get_cpu_scaling(), otherwise we get some errors on a Lenovo
> > > > Thinkpad
> > > > T14P Gen 2:
> > > >
> > > > BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code:
> > > > swapper/0/1
> > > > caller is hwp_get_cpu_scaling+0x7f/0xc0
> > > >
> > > > Fixes: b52aaeeadfac ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: Avoid SMP calls to
> > > > get
> > > > cpu-type")
> > > > Signed-off-by: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
> >
> > It's still broken after this patch though because the function should
> > use the cpu_data() of the target CPU and not of the CPU running the
> > code.
>
> That is correct. The below patch should work.
OK, I'll add an ACK from you to it then if you don't mind.
> >
> > The patch below should fix it.
> >
> > ===
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> > Subject: [PATCH v1] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Fix hwp_get_cpu_scaling()
> >
> > Commit b52aaeeadfac ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: Avoid SMP calls to get
> > cpu-type") introduced two issues into hwp_get_cpu_scaling(). First,
> > it made that function use the CPU type of the CPU running the code
> > even though the target CPU is passed as the argument to it and
> > second,
> > it used smp_processor_id() for that even though hwp_get_cpu_scaling()
> > runs in preemptible context.
> >
> > Fix both of these problems by simply passing "cpu" to cpu_data().
> >
> > Fixes: b52aaeeadfac ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: Avoid SMP calls to get
> > cpu-type")
> > Link:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20250412103434.5321-1-xry111@xry111.site/
> > Reported-by: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>
> > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> > @@ -2336,7 +2336,7 @@
> > static int hwp_get_cpu_scaling(int cpu)
> > {
> > if (hybrid_scaling_factor) {
> > - struct cpuinfo_x86 *c =
> > &cpu_data(smp_processor_id());
> > + struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu);
> > u8 cpu_type = c->topo.intel_type;
> >
> > /*
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.