RE: [PATCH next 0/5] locking/osq_lock: Optimisations to osq_lock code

Posted by David Laight 1 year, 12 months ago

From: Linus Torvalds
> Sent: 30 December 2023 19:41
> 
> On Fri, 29 Dec 2023 at 12:52, David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com> wrote:
> >
> > David Laight (5):
> >   Move the definition of optimistic_spin_node into osf_lock.c
> >   Clarify osq_wait_next()
> 
> I took these two as preparatory independent patches, with that
> osq_wait_next() clarification split into two.
> 
> I also did the renaming that Waiman asked for.

Ok, I'll try to remove them from any respin.
(Or at least put them first!)

	David

-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)

Re: [PATCH next 0/5] locking/osq_lock: Optimisations to osq_lock code

Posted by Waiman Long 1 year, 12 months ago

On 12/30/23 17:39, David Laight wrote:
> From: Linus Torvalds
>> Sent: 30 December 2023 19:41
>>
>> On Fri, 29 Dec 2023 at 12:52, David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com> wrote:
>>> David Laight (5):
>>>    Move the definition of optimistic_spin_node into osf_lock.c
>>>    Clarify osq_wait_next()
>> I took these two as preparatory independent patches, with that
>> osq_wait_next() clarification split into two.
>>
>> I also did the renaming that Waiman asked for.
> Ok, I'll try to remove them from any respin.
> (Or at least put them first!)

The first 2 patches have been included in Linus' master branch. So you 
should just remove them from a respin.

Cheers,
Longman