drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/class.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
There is a spelling mistake of 'ACCCESS_LOCAL' which should be
'ACCESS_LOCAL'.
Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: WangYuli <wangyuli@uniontech.com>
---
drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/class.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/class.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/class.c
index c04bb7f97a4d..7680474c4f96 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/class.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/class.c
@@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ static int intel_pmt_populate_entry(struct intel_pmt_entry *entry,
/*
* Some hardware use a different calculation for the base address
* when access_type == ACCESS_LOCAL. On the these systems
- * ACCCESS_LOCAL refers to an address in the same BAR as the
+ * ACCESS_LOCAL refers to an address in the same BAR as the
* header but at a fixed offset. But as the header address was
* supplied to the driver, we don't know which BAR it was in.
* So search for the bar whose range includes the header address.
--
2.45.2
Hi WangYuli, On 29-Sep-24 11:23 AM, WangYuli wrote: > There is a spelling mistake of 'ACCCESS_LOCAL' which should be > 'ACCESS_LOCAL'. > > Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de> > Signed-off-by: WangYuli <wangyuli@uniontech.com> You send your v3 patch just add the start of the 6.12 merge window, so nothing will happen until 6.12-rc1 is out (sometime today). As such there is no need for this resend. Next time please wait a bit longer before posting a resend, especially during the merge window. Regards, Hans > --- > drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/class.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/class.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/class.c > index c04bb7f97a4d..7680474c4f96 100644 > --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/class.c > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/class.c > @@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ static int intel_pmt_populate_entry(struct intel_pmt_entry *entry, > /* > * Some hardware use a different calculation for the base address > * when access_type == ACCESS_LOCAL. On the these systems > - * ACCCESS_LOCAL refers to an address in the same BAR as the > + * ACCESS_LOCAL refers to an address in the same BAR as the > * header but at a fixed offset. But as the header address was > * supplied to the driver, we don't know which BAR it was in. > * So search for the bar whose range includes the header address.
© 2016 - 2024 Red Hat, Inc.