fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 13 ++++++------- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2023 20:10:09 +0100
The label “out” was used to jump to another pointer check despite of
the detail in the implementation of the function
“relocating_repair_kthread” that it was determined already that
a corresponding variable contained a null pointer because of
a failed call of the function “btrfs_lookup_block_group”.
* Thus use more appropriate labels instead.
* Delete a redundant check.
This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
Fixes: f7ef5287a63d ("btrfs: zoned: relocate block group to repair IO failure in zoned filesystems")
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
---
fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 13 ++++++-------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
index 6d0124b6e79e..de11ad6c8740 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -8096,23 +8096,22 @@ static int relocating_repair_kthread(void *data)
/* Ensure block group still exists */
cache = btrfs_lookup_block_group(fs_info, target);
if (!cache)
- goto out;
+ goto unlock;
if (!test_bit(BLOCK_GROUP_FLAG_RELOCATING_REPAIR, &cache->runtime_flags))
- goto out;
+ goto put_block_group;
ret = btrfs_may_alloc_data_chunk(fs_info, target);
if (ret < 0)
- goto out;
+ goto put_block_group;
btrfs_info(fs_info,
"zoned: relocating block group %llu to repair IO failure",
target);
ret = btrfs_relocate_chunk(fs_info, target);
-
-out:
- if (cache)
- btrfs_put_block_group(cache);
+put_block_group:
+ btrfs_put_block_group(cache);
+unlock:
mutex_unlock(&fs_info->reclaim_bgs_lock);
btrfs_exclop_finish(fs_info);
sb_end_write(fs_info->sb);
--
2.40.0
On Tue Mar 4, 2025 at 5:31 AM JST, Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2023 20:10:09 +0100
>
> The label “out” was used to jump to another pointer check despite of
> the detail in the implementation of the function
> “relocating_repair_kthread” that it was determined already that
> a corresponding variable contained a null pointer because of
> a failed call of the function “btrfs_lookup_block_group”.
>
> * Thus use more appropriate labels instead.
>
> * Delete a redundant check.
>
>
> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
Since this function is local to the zoned feature, could I have "zoned: "
added to the subject line?
Other than that, it looks reasonable to me.
Reviewed-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
>
> Fixes: f7ef5287a63d ("btrfs: zoned: relocate block group to repair IO failure in zoned filesystems")
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 13 ++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> index 6d0124b6e79e..de11ad6c8740 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> @@ -8096,23 +8096,22 @@ static int relocating_repair_kthread(void *data)
> /* Ensure block group still exists */
> cache = btrfs_lookup_block_group(fs_info, target);
> if (!cache)
> - goto out;
> + goto unlock;
>
> if (!test_bit(BLOCK_GROUP_FLAG_RELOCATING_REPAIR, &cache->runtime_flags))
> - goto out;
> + goto put_block_group;
>
> ret = btrfs_may_alloc_data_chunk(fs_info, target);
> if (ret < 0)
> - goto out;
> + goto put_block_group;
>
> btrfs_info(fs_info,
> "zoned: relocating block group %llu to repair IO failure",
> target);
> ret = btrfs_relocate_chunk(fs_info, target);
> -
> -out:
> - if (cache)
> - btrfs_put_block_group(cache);
> +put_block_group:
> + btrfs_put_block_group(cache);
> +unlock:
> mutex_unlock(&fs_info->reclaim_bgs_lock);
> btrfs_exclop_finish(fs_info);
> sb_end_write(fs_info->sb);
> --
> 2.40.0
On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 01:34:00AM +0000, Naohiro Aota wrote:
> On Tue Mar 4, 2025 at 5:31 AM JST, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> > Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2023 20:10:09 +0100
> >
> > The label “out” was used to jump to another pointer check despite of
> > the detail in the implementation of the function
> > “relocating_repair_kthread” that it was determined already that
> > a corresponding variable contained a null pointer because of
> > a failed call of the function “btrfs_lookup_block_group”.
> >
> > * Thus use more appropriate labels instead.
> >
> > * Delete a redundant check.
> >
> >
> > This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
>
> Since this function is local to the zoned feature, could I have "zoned: "
> added to the subject line?
>
> Other than that, it looks reasonable to me.
>
> Reviewed-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
>
> >
> > Fixes: f7ef5287a63d ("btrfs: zoned: relocate block group to repair IO failure in zoned filesystems")
> > Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Don't use Fixes tags, if it's not a bug fix.
regards,
dan carpenter
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.