> -----Original Message-----
> From: Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@wdc.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2024 5:42 PM
> To: Seunghui Lee <sh043.lee@samsung.com>; linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; ulf.hansson@linaro.org;
> gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
> Cc: grant.jung@samsung.com; jt77.jang@samsung.com;
> dh0421.hwang@samsung.com; junwoo80.lee@samsung.com; jangsub.yi@samsung.com;
> cw9316.lee@samsung.com; sh8267.baek@samsung.com; wkon.kim@samsung.com
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] mmc: sd: Add a variable to check a faulty device
>
> > In mobile devices, suspend/resume situations are frequent.
> > In the case of a defective SD card in which initialization fails,
> > unnecessary initialization time is consumed for each resume.
> > A field is needed to check that SD card initialization has failed on
> > the host. It could be used to remove unnecessary initialization.
> I don't see where you are using this new init_failed field?
> Maybe instead, elaborate the logic to free_card: to detect a broken sd.
> e.g. instead of just if (!oldcard), if (!oldcard || ! mmc_sd_alive(host))
> or something.
>
> Thanks,
> Avri
>
Thank you for your suggestion.
I'm going to use it in mmc_rescan as below.
e.g.
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c index a8c17b4cd737..461cd75dc7ab 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
@@ -2210,7 +2210,7 @@ void mmc_rescan(struct work_struct *work)
container_of(work, struct mmc_host, detect.work);
int i;
- if (host->rescan_disable)
+ if (host->rescan_disable || host->init_failed)
return;
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Seunghui Lee <sh043.lee@samsung.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/mmc/core/sd.c | 12 +++++++++++-
> > drivers/mmc/core/slot-gpio.c | 1 +
> > include/linux/mmc/host.h | 1 +
> > 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/sd.c b/drivers/mmc/core/sd.c index
> > c3e554344c99..f0eb3864dc24 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mmc/core/sd.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/sd.c
> > @@ -1410,6 +1410,7 @@ static int mmc_sd_init_card(struct mmc_host
> > *host,
> > u32 ocr,
> > bool v18_fixup_failed = false;
> >
> > WARN_ON(!host->claimed);
> > + host->init_failed = false;
> > retry:
> > err = mmc_sd_get_cid(host, ocr, cid, &rocr);
> > if (err)
> > @@ -1752,6 +1753,8 @@ static int _mmc_sd_resume(struct mmc_host *host)
> >
> > mmc_power_up(host, host->card->ocr);
> > err = mmc_sd_init_card(host, host->card->ocr, host->card);
> > + if (err)
> > + host->init_failed = true;
> > mmc_card_clr_suspended(host->card);
> >
> > out:
> > @@ -1803,8 +1806,12 @@ static int mmc_sd_runtime_resume(struct
> > mmc_host *host)
> >
> > static int mmc_sd_hw_reset(struct mmc_host *host) {
> > + int err;
> > mmc_power_cycle(host, host->card->ocr);
> > - return mmc_sd_init_card(host, host->card->ocr, host->card);
> > + err = mmc_sd_init_card(host, host->card->ocr, host->card);
> > + if (err)
> > + host->init_failed = true;
> > + return err;
> > }
> >
> > static const struct mmc_bus_ops mmc_sd_ops = { @@ -1891,5 +1898,8 @@
> > int mmc_attach_sd(struct mmc_host *host)
> > pr_err("%s: error %d whilst initialising SD card\n",
> > mmc_hostname(host), err);
> >
> > + if (err)
> > + host->init_failed = true;
> > +
> > return err;
> > }
> > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/slot-gpio.c
> > b/drivers/mmc/core/slot-gpio.c index
> > 2a2d949a9344..93d081c7dd53 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mmc/core/slot-gpio.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/slot-gpio.c
> > @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ static irqreturn_t mmc_gpio_cd_irqt(int irq, void
> *dev_id)
> > struct mmc_gpio *ctx = host->slot.handler_priv;
> >
> > host->trigger_card_event = true;
> > + host->init_failed = false;
> > mmc_detect_change(host,
> > msecs_to_jiffies(ctx->cd_debounce_delay_ms));
> >
> > return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/host.h b/include/linux/mmc/host.h index
> > 2f445c651742..1d75cfdbf981 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/mmc/host.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/mmc/host.h
> > @@ -467,6 +467,7 @@ struct mmc_host {
> > struct timer_list retune_timer; /* for periodic re-tuning */
> >
> > bool trigger_card_event; /* card_event necessary */
> > + bool init_failed; /* check if failed to
> initialize */
> >
> > struct mmc_card *card; /* device attached to this host
> */
> >
> > --
> > 2.29.0
On 13/02/2024 09:49, 이승희 wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@wdc.com> >> Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2024 5:42 PM >> To: Seunghui Lee <sh043.lee@samsung.com>; linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org; >> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; ulf.hansson@linaro.org; >> gregkh@linuxfoundation.org >> Cc: grant.jung@samsung.com; jt77.jang@samsung.com; >> dh0421.hwang@samsung.com; junwoo80.lee@samsung.com; jangsub.yi@samsung.com; >> cw9316.lee@samsung.com; sh8267.baek@samsung.com; wkon.kim@samsung.com >> Subject: RE: [PATCH] mmc: sd: Add a variable to check a faulty device >> >>> In mobile devices, suspend/resume situations are frequent. >>> In the case of a defective SD card in which initialization fails, >>> unnecessary initialization time is consumed for each resume. >>> A field is needed to check that SD card initialization has failed on >>> the host. It could be used to remove unnecessary initialization. >> I don't see where you are using this new init_failed field? >> Maybe instead, elaborate the logic to free_card: to detect a broken sd. >> e.g. instead of just if (!oldcard), if (!oldcard || ! mmc_sd_alive(host)) >> or something. >> >> Thanks, >> Avri >> > Thank you for your suggestion. > I'm going to use it in mmc_rescan as below. > > e.g. > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c index a8c17b4cd737..461cd75dc7ab 100644 > --- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c > +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c > @@ -2210,7 +2210,7 @@ void mmc_rescan(struct work_struct *work) > container_of(work, struct mmc_host, detect.work); > int i; > > - if (host->rescan_disable) > + if (host->rescan_disable || host->init_failed) > return; I've seen SD cards that fail the first initialization attempt for both 'valid' reasons (e.g. weird insertion timing) and things like out-of-spec initialization time from the card, outright disabling these on the first fail is a bit too much IMO. Kind Regards, Christian
> -----Original Message----- > From: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com> > Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2024 10:35 PM > To: 이승희 <sh043.lee@samsung.com>; 'Avri Altman' <Avri.Altman@wdc.com>; > linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; > ulf.hansson@linaro.org; gregkh@linuxfoundation.org > Cc: grant.jung@samsung.com; jt77.jang@samsung.com; > dh0421.hwang@samsung.com; junwoo80.lee@samsung.com; jangsub.yi@samsung.com; > cw9316.lee@samsung.com; sh8267.baek@samsung.com; wkon.kim@samsung.com > Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: sd: Add a variable to check a faulty device > > On 13/02/2024 09:49, 이승희 wrote: > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@wdc.com> > >> Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2024 5:42 PM > >> To: Seunghui Lee <sh043.lee@samsung.com>; linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org; > >> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; ulf.hansson@linaro.org; > >> gregkh@linuxfoundation.org > >> Cc: grant.jung@samsung.com; jt77.jang@samsung.com; > >> dh0421.hwang@samsung.com; junwoo80.lee@samsung.com; > >> jangsub.yi@samsung.com; cw9316.lee@samsung.com; > >> sh8267.baek@samsung.com; wkon.kim@samsung.com > >> Subject: RE: [PATCH] mmc: sd: Add a variable to check a faulty device > >> > >>> In mobile devices, suspend/resume situations are frequent. > >>> In the case of a defective SD card in which initialization fails, > >>> unnecessary initialization time is consumed for each resume. > >>> A field is needed to check that SD card initialization has failed on > >>> the host. It could be used to remove unnecessary initialization. > >> I don't see where you are using this new init_failed field? > >> Maybe instead, elaborate the logic to free_card: to detect a broken sd. > >> e.g. instead of just if (!oldcard), if (!oldcard || ! > >> mmc_sd_alive(host)) or something. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Avri > >> > > Thank you for your suggestion. > > I'm going to use it in mmc_rescan as below. > > > > e.g. > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c index > > a8c17b4cd737..461cd75dc7ab 100644 > > --- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c > > +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c > > @@ -2210,7 +2210,7 @@ void mmc_rescan(struct work_struct *work) > > container_of(work, struct mmc_host, detect.work); > > int i; > > > > - if (host->rescan_disable) > > + if (host->rescan_disable || host->init_failed) > > return; > > I've seen SD cards that fail the first initialization attempt for both > 'valid' reasons (e.g. weird insertion timing) and things like out-of-spec > initialization time from the card, outright disabling these on the first > fail is a bit too much IMO. > > Kind Regards, > Christian I agree with you. It's a bit too much. It's just simple example. Anyway, It's difficult to distinguish between NO card and a faulty card. That's why I'd like to merge this. It helps that we check if it's a faulty card or not in a dump.
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.