xen/common/grant_table.c | 6 +----- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
One of the warning message in gnttab_grow_table() refers to a function
was removed in commit 6425f91c72 "xen/gnttab: Fold grant_table_{create,
set_limits}() into grant_table_init()".
Since the commit, gt->active will be allocated while initializing the
grant table at domain creation. Therefore gt-active will always be
valid.
Rather than replacing the warning by another one, we can now downgrade
the check to an ASSERT().
Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <jgrall@amazon.com>
---
xen/common/grant_table.c | 6 +-----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/xen/common/grant_table.c b/xen/common/grant_table.c
index bc37acae0e..930d20b346 100644
--- a/xen/common/grant_table.c
+++ b/xen/common/grant_table.c
@@ -1793,11 +1793,7 @@ gnttab_grow_table(struct domain *d, unsigned int req_nr_frames)
struct grant_table *gt = d->grant_table;
unsigned int i, j;
- if ( unlikely(!gt->active) )
- {
- gprintk(XENLOG_WARNING, "grant_table_set_limits() call missing\n");
- return -ENODEV;
- }
+ ASSERT(gt->active);
if ( req_nr_frames < INITIAL_NR_GRANT_FRAMES )
req_nr_frames = INITIAL_NR_GRANT_FRAMES;
--
2.17.1
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
On 25/02/2020 13:25, Julien Grall wrote:
> One of the warning message in gnttab_grow_table() refers to a function
> was removed in commit 6425f91c72 "xen/gnttab: Fold grant_table_{create,
> set_limits}() into grant_table_init()".
>
> Since the commit, gt->active will be allocated while initializing the
> grant table at domain creation. Therefore gt-active will always be
> valid.
>
> Rather than replacing the warning by another one, we can now downgrade
> the check to an ASSERT().
>
> Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <jgrall@amazon.com>
TBH, I'd drop the assert. As you identify, its not helpful, and there
is no chance we're moving back to a semi-not-initialised-yet world.
Either way, Acked-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
On 25.02.2020 14:29, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 25/02/2020 13:25, Julien Grall wrote:
>> One of the warning message in gnttab_grow_table() refers to a function
>> was removed in commit 6425f91c72 "xen/gnttab: Fold grant_table_{create,
>> set_limits}() into grant_table_init()".
>>
>> Since the commit, gt->active will be allocated while initializing the
>> grant table at domain creation. Therefore gt-active will always be
>> valid.
>>
>> Rather than replacing the warning by another one, we can now downgrade
>> the check to an ASSERT().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <jgrall@amazon.com>
>
> TBH, I'd drop the assert.
+1 fwiw
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
On 25/02/2020 13:29, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 25/02/2020 13:25, Julien Grall wrote:
>> One of the warning message in gnttab_grow_table() refers to a function
>> was removed in commit 6425f91c72 "xen/gnttab: Fold grant_table_{create,
>> set_limits}() into grant_table_init()".
>>
>> Since the commit, gt->active will be allocated while initializing the
>> grant table at domain creation. Therefore gt-active will always be
>> valid.
>>
>> Rather than replacing the warning by another one, we can now downgrade
>> the check to an ASSERT().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <jgrall@amazon.com>
>
> TBH, I'd drop the assert. As you identify, its not helpful, and there
> is no chance we're moving back to a semi-not-initialised-yet world.
I will drop the ASSERT then and resend the patch.
>
> Either way, Acked-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Cheers,
--
Julien Grall
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.