Create a SiFive Unleashed U54 SoC and use that in the sifive_u machine.
We leave the SoC, RAM, device tree and reset/fdt loading as part of the
machine. All the other device creation has been moved to the SoC.
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
---
hw/riscv/sifive_u.c | 90 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
include/hw/riscv/sifive_u.h | 16 ++++++-
2 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/riscv/sifive_u.c b/hw/riscv/sifive_u.c
index 9f3d184b72..4924f92262 100644
--- a/hw/riscv/sifive_u.c
+++ b/hw/riscv/sifive_u.c
@@ -114,10 +114,10 @@ static void create_fdt(SiFiveUState *s, const struct MemmapEntry *memmap,
qemu_fdt_setprop_cell(fdt, "/cpus", "#size-cells", 0x0);
qemu_fdt_setprop_cell(fdt, "/cpus", "#address-cells", 0x1);
- for (cpu = s->soc.num_harts - 1; cpu >= 0; cpu--) {
+ for (cpu = s->soc.cpus.num_harts - 1; cpu >= 0; cpu--) {
nodename = g_strdup_printf("/cpus/cpu@%d", cpu);
char *intc = g_strdup_printf("/cpus/cpu@%d/interrupt-controller", cpu);
- char *isa = riscv_isa_string(&s->soc.harts[cpu]);
+ char *isa = riscv_isa_string(&s->soc.cpus.harts[cpu]);
qemu_fdt_add_subnode(fdt, nodename);
qemu_fdt_setprop_cell(fdt, nodename, "clock-frequency",
SIFIVE_U_CLOCK_FREQ);
@@ -138,8 +138,8 @@ static void create_fdt(SiFiveUState *s, const struct MemmapEntry *memmap,
g_free(nodename);
}
- cells = g_new0(uint32_t, s->soc.num_harts * 4);
- for (cpu = 0; cpu < s->soc.num_harts; cpu++) {
+ cells = g_new0(uint32_t, s->soc.cpus.num_harts * 4);
+ for (cpu = 0; cpu < s->soc.cpus.num_harts; cpu++) {
nodename =
g_strdup_printf("/cpus/cpu@%d/interrupt-controller", cpu);
uint32_t intc_phandle = qemu_fdt_get_phandle(fdt, nodename);
@@ -157,12 +157,12 @@ static void create_fdt(SiFiveUState *s, const struct MemmapEntry *memmap,
0x0, memmap[SIFIVE_U_CLINT].base,
0x0, memmap[SIFIVE_U_CLINT].size);
qemu_fdt_setprop(fdt, nodename, "interrupts-extended",
- cells, s->soc.num_harts * sizeof(uint32_t) * 4);
+ cells, s->soc.cpus.num_harts * sizeof(uint32_t) * 4);
g_free(cells);
g_free(nodename);
- cells = g_new0(uint32_t, s->soc.num_harts * 4);
- for (cpu = 0; cpu < s->soc.num_harts; cpu++) {
+ cells = g_new0(uint32_t, s->soc.cpus.num_harts * 4);
+ for (cpu = 0; cpu < s->soc.cpus.num_harts; cpu++) {
nodename =
g_strdup_printf("/cpus/cpu@%d/interrupt-controller", cpu);
uint32_t intc_phandle = qemu_fdt_get_phandle(fdt, nodename);
@@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ static void create_fdt(SiFiveUState *s, const struct MemmapEntry *memmap,
qemu_fdt_setprop_string(fdt, nodename, "compatible", "riscv,plic0");
qemu_fdt_setprop(fdt, nodename, "interrupt-controller", NULL, 0);
qemu_fdt_setprop(fdt, nodename, "interrupts-extended",
- cells, s->soc.num_harts * sizeof(uint32_t) * 4);
+ cells, s->soc.cpus.num_harts * sizeof(uint32_t) * 4);
qemu_fdt_setprop_cells(fdt, nodename, "reg",
0x0, memmap[SIFIVE_U_PLIC].base,
0x0, memmap[SIFIVE_U_PLIC].size);
@@ -215,17 +215,12 @@ static void riscv_sifive_u_init(MachineState *machine)
SiFiveUState *s = g_new0(SiFiveUState, 1);
MemoryRegion *system_memory = get_system_memory();
MemoryRegion *main_mem = g_new(MemoryRegion, 1);
- MemoryRegion *mask_rom = g_new(MemoryRegion, 1);
int i;
- /* Initialize SOC */
- object_initialize(&s->soc, sizeof(s->soc), TYPE_RISCV_HART_ARRAY);
+ /* Initialize SoC */
+ object_initialize(&s->soc, sizeof(s->soc), TYPE_RISCV_U54_SOC);
object_property_add_child(OBJECT(machine), "soc", OBJECT(&s->soc),
&error_abort);
- object_property_set_str(OBJECT(&s->soc), SIFIVE_U_CPU, "cpu-type",
- &error_abort);
- object_property_set_int(OBJECT(&s->soc), smp_cpus, "num-harts",
- &error_abort);
object_property_set_bool(OBJECT(&s->soc), true, "realized",
&error_abort);
@@ -233,17 +228,11 @@ static void riscv_sifive_u_init(MachineState *machine)
memory_region_init_ram(main_mem, NULL, "riscv.sifive.u.ram",
machine->ram_size, &error_fatal);
memory_region_add_subregion(system_memory, memmap[SIFIVE_U_DRAM].base,
- main_mem);
+ main_mem);
/* create device tree */
create_fdt(s, memmap, machine->ram_size, machine->kernel_cmdline);
- /* boot rom */
- memory_region_init_rom(mask_rom, NULL, "riscv.sifive.u.mrom",
- memmap[SIFIVE_U_MROM].size, &error_fatal);
- memory_region_add_subregion(system_memory, memmap[SIFIVE_U_MROM].base,
- mask_rom);
-
if (machine->kernel_filename) {
load_kernel(machine->kernel_filename);
}
@@ -282,6 +271,39 @@ static void riscv_sifive_u_init(MachineState *machine)
rom_add_blob_fixed_as("mrom.fdt", s->fdt, s->fdt_size,
memmap[SIFIVE_U_MROM].base + sizeof(reset_vec),
&address_space_memory);
+}
+
+static void riscv_sifive_u54_init(Object *obj)
+{
+ const struct MemmapEntry *memmap = sifive_u_memmap;
+
+ SiFiveU54State *s = RISCV_U54_SOC(obj);
+ MemoryRegion *system_memory = get_system_memory();
+ MemoryRegion *mask_rom = g_new(MemoryRegion, 1);
+
+ object_initialize(&s->cpus, sizeof(s->cpus), TYPE_RISCV_HART_ARRAY);
+ object_property_add_child(obj, "cpus", OBJECT(&s->cpus),
+ &error_abort);
+ object_property_set_str(OBJECT(&s->cpus), SIFIVE_U_CPU, "cpu-type",
+ &error_abort);
+ object_property_set_int(OBJECT(&s->cpus), smp_cpus, "num-harts",
+ &error_abort);
+
+ /* boot rom */
+ memory_region_init_rom(mask_rom, NULL, "riscv.sifive.u.mrom",
+ memmap[SIFIVE_U_MROM].size, &error_fatal);
+ memory_region_add_subregion(system_memory, memmap[SIFIVE_U_MROM].base,
+ mask_rom);
+}
+
+static void riscv_sifive_u54_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
+{
+ SiFiveU54State *s = RISCV_U54_SOC(dev);
+ const struct MemmapEntry *memmap = sifive_u_memmap;
+ MemoryRegion *system_memory = get_system_memory();
+
+ object_property_set_bool(OBJECT(&s->cpus), true, "realized",
+ &error_abort);
/* MMIO */
s->plic = sifive_plic_create(memmap[SIFIVE_U_PLIC].base,
@@ -312,3 +334,27 @@ static void riscv_sifive_u_machine_init(MachineClass *mc)
}
DEFINE_MACHINE("sifive_u", riscv_sifive_u_machine_init)
+
+static void riscv_sifive_u54_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
+{
+ DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(oc);
+
+ dc->realize = riscv_sifive_u54_realize;
+ /* Reason: Uses serial_hds in realize function, thus can't be used twice */
+ dc->user_creatable = false;
+}
+
+static const TypeInfo riscv_sifive_u54_type_info = {
+ .name = TYPE_RISCV_U54_SOC,
+ .parent = TYPE_DEVICE,
+ .instance_size = sizeof(SiFiveU54State),
+ .instance_init = riscv_sifive_u54_init,
+ .class_init = riscv_sifive_u54_class_init,
+};
+
+static void riscv_sifive_u54_register_types(void)
+{
+ type_register_static(&riscv_sifive_u54_type_info);
+}
+
+type_init(riscv_sifive_u54_register_types)
diff --git a/include/hw/riscv/sifive_u.h b/include/hw/riscv/sifive_u.h
index 94a390566e..0f8bdd8fab 100644
--- a/include/hw/riscv/sifive_u.h
+++ b/include/hw/riscv/sifive_u.h
@@ -19,13 +19,25 @@
#ifndef HW_SIFIVE_U_H
#define HW_SIFIVE_U_H
-typedef struct SiFiveUState {
+#define TYPE_RISCV_U54_SOC "riscv.sifive.u54"
+#define RISCV_U54_SOC(obj) \
+ OBJECT_CHECK(SiFiveU54State, (obj), TYPE_RISCV_U54_SOC)
+
+typedef struct SiFiveU54State {
/*< private >*/
SysBusDevice parent_obj;
/*< public >*/
- RISCVHartArrayState soc;
+ RISCVHartArrayState cpus;
DeviceState *plic;
+} SiFiveU54State;
+
+typedef struct SiFiveUState {
+ /*< private >*/
+ SysBusDevice parent_obj;
+
+ /*< public >*/
+ SiFiveU54State soc;
void *fdt;
int fdt_size;
} SiFiveUState;
--
2.17.0
On Sat, May 5, 2018 at 8:12 AM, Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
wrote:
> Create a SiFive Unleashed U54 SoC and use that in the sifive_u machine.
>
> We leave the SoC, RAM, device tree and reset/fdt loading as part of the
> machine. All the other device creation has been moved to the SoC.
>
There is a tiny problem that we will have to resolve with renaming,
otherwise we will end up with lots of SOCs that are the essentially same
with a different CPU.
There is an intention to add a HiFive1 and HiFiveU board in the future
however we were very explicit in renaming sifive_e300 and sifive_u500 to
sifive_e and sifive_u.
If you read the code more closely you'll notice that we instantiate the
sifive_u board with a U34 if 32-bit and a U54 if 64-bit.
#if defined(TARGET_RISCV32)
#define SIFIVE_U_CPU TYPE_RISCV_CPU_SIFIVE_U34
#elif defined(TARGET_RISCV64)
#define SIFIVE_U_CPU TYPE_RISCV_CPU_SIFIVE_U54
#endif
The rationale is that sifive_e and sifive_u can eventually be customized to
represent different configurations of SiFive Core IP. We won't want to end
up hardcoding specific models in sifive_e or sifive_u
SiFive have been talking internally about having sifive_e and sifive_u
reconfigurable, possibly even to the extend where we can configure with a
memory map. This is somewhat consistent with what SiFive do internally as
the FE310 and FU540 are configurations generated by a core generator.
Now comes the question of whether its the right time to add a 'hifive1' or
'hifiveu' machine. I don't think it is immediately necessary. The thought
being that we would be able to give a configuration string of file to sifive_u
e.g. "e51,u54,u54,u54". There is a different between the U54 and the U54-MC
which has an E51 core for management tasks. The PLIC has already been
written with this in mind, and is re-configurable to support the U54-MC
memory layout.
In anycase. The change is simply to use sifive_u_soc or sifive_u without
the 54 (given it configures with a U34 in 32-bit like the sifive_e
configures with an E51 in 64-bit mode, both valid configurations)
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
> ---
> hw/riscv/sifive_u.c | 90 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> include/hw/riscv/sifive_u.h | 16 ++++++-
> 2 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/riscv/sifive_u.c b/hw/riscv/sifive_u.c
> index 9f3d184b72..4924f92262 100644
> --- a/hw/riscv/sifive_u.c
> +++ b/hw/riscv/sifive_u.c
> @@ -114,10 +114,10 @@ static void create_fdt(SiFiveUState *s, const struct
> MemmapEntry *memmap,
> qemu_fdt_setprop_cell(fdt, "/cpus", "#size-cells", 0x0);
> qemu_fdt_setprop_cell(fdt, "/cpus", "#address-cells", 0x1);
>
> - for (cpu = s->soc.num_harts - 1; cpu >= 0; cpu--) {
> + for (cpu = s->soc.cpus.num_harts - 1; cpu >= 0; cpu--) {
> nodename = g_strdup_printf("/cpus/cpu@%d", cpu);
> char *intc = g_strdup_printf("/cpus/cpu@%d/interrupt-controller",
> cpu);
> - char *isa = riscv_isa_string(&s->soc.harts[cpu]);
> + char *isa = riscv_isa_string(&s->soc.cpus.harts[cpu]);
> qemu_fdt_add_subnode(fdt, nodename);
> qemu_fdt_setprop_cell(fdt, nodename, "clock-frequency",
> SIFIVE_U_CLOCK_FREQ);
> @@ -138,8 +138,8 @@ static void create_fdt(SiFiveUState *s, const struct
> MemmapEntry *memmap,
> g_free(nodename);
> }
>
> - cells = g_new0(uint32_t, s->soc.num_harts * 4);
> - for (cpu = 0; cpu < s->soc.num_harts; cpu++) {
> + cells = g_new0(uint32_t, s->soc.cpus.num_harts * 4);
> + for (cpu = 0; cpu < s->soc.cpus.num_harts; cpu++) {
> nodename =
> g_strdup_printf("/cpus/cpu@%d/interrupt-controller", cpu);
> uint32_t intc_phandle = qemu_fdt_get_phandle(fdt, nodename);
> @@ -157,12 +157,12 @@ static void create_fdt(SiFiveUState *s, const struct
> MemmapEntry *memmap,
> 0x0, memmap[SIFIVE_U_CLINT].base,
> 0x0, memmap[SIFIVE_U_CLINT].size);
> qemu_fdt_setprop(fdt, nodename, "interrupts-extended",
> - cells, s->soc.num_harts * sizeof(uint32_t) * 4);
> + cells, s->soc.cpus.num_harts * sizeof(uint32_t) * 4);
> g_free(cells);
> g_free(nodename);
>
> - cells = g_new0(uint32_t, s->soc.num_harts * 4);
> - for (cpu = 0; cpu < s->soc.num_harts; cpu++) {
> + cells = g_new0(uint32_t, s->soc.cpus.num_harts * 4);
> + for (cpu = 0; cpu < s->soc.cpus.num_harts; cpu++) {
> nodename =
> g_strdup_printf("/cpus/cpu@%d/interrupt-controller", cpu);
> uint32_t intc_phandle = qemu_fdt_get_phandle(fdt, nodename);
> @@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ static void create_fdt(SiFiveUState *s, const struct
> MemmapEntry *memmap,
> qemu_fdt_setprop_string(fdt, nodename, "compatible", "riscv,plic0");
> qemu_fdt_setprop(fdt, nodename, "interrupt-controller", NULL, 0);
> qemu_fdt_setprop(fdt, nodename, "interrupts-extended",
> - cells, s->soc.num_harts * sizeof(uint32_t) * 4);
> + cells, s->soc.cpus.num_harts * sizeof(uint32_t) * 4);
> qemu_fdt_setprop_cells(fdt, nodename, "reg",
> 0x0, memmap[SIFIVE_U_PLIC].base,
> 0x0, memmap[SIFIVE_U_PLIC].size);
> @@ -215,17 +215,12 @@ static void riscv_sifive_u_init(MachineState
> *machine)
> SiFiveUState *s = g_new0(SiFiveUState, 1);
> MemoryRegion *system_memory = get_system_memory();
> MemoryRegion *main_mem = g_new(MemoryRegion, 1);
> - MemoryRegion *mask_rom = g_new(MemoryRegion, 1);
> int i;
>
> - /* Initialize SOC */
> - object_initialize(&s->soc, sizeof(s->soc), TYPE_RISCV_HART_ARRAY);
> + /* Initialize SoC */
> + object_initialize(&s->soc, sizeof(s->soc), TYPE_RISCV_U54_SOC);
> object_property_add_child(OBJECT(machine), "soc", OBJECT(&s->soc),
> &error_abort);
> - object_property_set_str(OBJECT(&s->soc), SIFIVE_U_CPU, "cpu-type",
> - &error_abort);
> - object_property_set_int(OBJECT(&s->soc), smp_cpus, "num-harts",
> - &error_abort);
> object_property_set_bool(OBJECT(&s->soc), true, "realized",
> &error_abort);
>
> @@ -233,17 +228,11 @@ static void riscv_sifive_u_init(MachineState
> *machine)
> memory_region_init_ram(main_mem, NULL, "riscv.sifive.u.ram",
> machine->ram_size, &error_fatal);
> memory_region_add_subregion(system_memory,
> memmap[SIFIVE_U_DRAM].base,
> - main_mem);
> + main_mem);
>
> /* create device tree */
> create_fdt(s, memmap, machine->ram_size, machine->kernel_cmdline);
>
> - /* boot rom */
> - memory_region_init_rom(mask_rom, NULL, "riscv.sifive.u.mrom",
> - memmap[SIFIVE_U_MROM].size, &error_fatal);
> - memory_region_add_subregion(system_memory,
> memmap[SIFIVE_U_MROM].base,
> - mask_rom);
> -
> if (machine->kernel_filename) {
> load_kernel(machine->kernel_filename);
> }
> @@ -282,6 +271,39 @@ static void riscv_sifive_u_init(MachineState
> *machine)
> rom_add_blob_fixed_as("mrom.fdt", s->fdt, s->fdt_size,
> memmap[SIFIVE_U_MROM].base + sizeof(reset_vec),
> &address_space_memory);
> +}
> +
> +static void riscv_sifive_u54_init(Object *obj)
> +{
> + const struct MemmapEntry *memmap = sifive_u_memmap;
> +
> + SiFiveU54State *s = RISCV_U54_SOC(obj);
> + MemoryRegion *system_memory = get_system_memory();
> + MemoryRegion *mask_rom = g_new(MemoryRegion, 1);
> +
> + object_initialize(&s->cpus, sizeof(s->cpus), TYPE_RISCV_HART_ARRAY);
> + object_property_add_child(obj, "cpus", OBJECT(&s->cpus),
> + &error_abort);
> + object_property_set_str(OBJECT(&s->cpus), SIFIVE_U_CPU, "cpu-type",
> + &error_abort);
> + object_property_set_int(OBJECT(&s->cpus), smp_cpus, "num-harts",
> + &error_abort);
> +
> + /* boot rom */
> + memory_region_init_rom(mask_rom, NULL, "riscv.sifive.u.mrom",
> + memmap[SIFIVE_U_MROM].size, &error_fatal);
> + memory_region_add_subregion(system_memory,
> memmap[SIFIVE_U_MROM].base,
> + mask_rom);
> +}
> +
> +static void riscv_sifive_u54_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
> +{
> + SiFiveU54State *s = RISCV_U54_SOC(dev);
> + const struct MemmapEntry *memmap = sifive_u_memmap;
> + MemoryRegion *system_memory = get_system_memory();
> +
> + object_property_set_bool(OBJECT(&s->cpus), true, "realized",
> + &error_abort);
>
> /* MMIO */
> s->plic = sifive_plic_create(memmap[SIFIVE_U_PLIC].base,
> @@ -312,3 +334,27 @@ static void riscv_sifive_u_machine_init(MachineClass
> *mc)
> }
>
> DEFINE_MACHINE("sifive_u", riscv_sifive_u_machine_init)
> +
> +static void riscv_sifive_u54_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
> +{
> + DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(oc);
> +
> + dc->realize = riscv_sifive_u54_realize;
> + /* Reason: Uses serial_hds in realize function, thus can't be used
> twice */
> + dc->user_creatable = false;
> +}
> +
> +static const TypeInfo riscv_sifive_u54_type_info = {
> + .name = TYPE_RISCV_U54_SOC,
> + .parent = TYPE_DEVICE,
> + .instance_size = sizeof(SiFiveU54State),
> + .instance_init = riscv_sifive_u54_init,
> + .class_init = riscv_sifive_u54_class_init,
> +};
> +
> +static void riscv_sifive_u54_register_types(void)
> +{
> + type_register_static(&riscv_sifive_u54_type_info);
> +}
> +
> +type_init(riscv_sifive_u54_register_types)
> diff --git a/include/hw/riscv/sifive_u.h b/include/hw/riscv/sifive_u.h
> index 94a390566e..0f8bdd8fab 100644
> --- a/include/hw/riscv/sifive_u.h
> +++ b/include/hw/riscv/sifive_u.h
> @@ -19,13 +19,25 @@
> #ifndef HW_SIFIVE_U_H
> #define HW_SIFIVE_U_H
>
> -typedef struct SiFiveUState {
> +#define TYPE_RISCV_U54_SOC "riscv.sifive.u54"
> +#define RISCV_U54_SOC(obj) \
> + OBJECT_CHECK(SiFiveU54State, (obj), TYPE_RISCV_U54_SOC)
> +
> +typedef struct SiFiveU54State {
> /*< private >*/
> SysBusDevice parent_obj;
>
> /*< public >*/
> - RISCVHartArrayState soc;
> + RISCVHartArrayState cpus;
> DeviceState *plic;
> +} SiFiveU54State;
> +
> +typedef struct SiFiveUState {
> + /*< private >*/
> + SysBusDevice parent_obj;
> +
> + /*< public >*/
> + SiFiveU54State soc;
> void *fdt;
> int fdt_size;
> } SiFiveUState;
> --
> 2.17.0
>
>
On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 3:55 PM, Michael Clark <mjc@sifive.com> wrote: > > > On Sat, May 5, 2018 at 8:12 AM, Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com> > wrote: >> >> Create a SiFive Unleashed U54 SoC and use that in the sifive_u machine. >> >> We leave the SoC, RAM, device tree and reset/fdt loading as part of the >> machine. All the other device creation has been moved to the SoC. > > > There is a tiny problem that we will have to resolve with renaming, > otherwise we will end up with lots of SOCs that are the essentially same > with a different CPU. > > There is an intention to add a HiFive1 and HiFiveU board in the future > however we were very explicit in renaming sifive_e300 and sifive_u500 to > sifive_e and sifive_u. > > If you read the code more closely you'll notice that we instantiate the > sifive_u board with a U34 if 32-bit and a U54 if 64-bit. > > #if defined(TARGET_RISCV32) > #define SIFIVE_U_CPU TYPE_RISCV_CPU_SIFIVE_U34 > #elif defined(TARGET_RISCV64) > #define SIFIVE_U_CPU TYPE_RISCV_CPU_SIFIVE_U54 > #endif > > The rationale is that sifive_e and sifive_u can eventually be customized to > represent different configurations of SiFive Core IP. We won't want to end > up hardcoding specific models in sifive_e or sifive_u > > SiFive have been talking internally about having sifive_e and sifive_u > reconfigurable, possibly even to the extend where we can configure with a > memory map. This is somewhat consistent with what SiFive do internally as > the FE310 and FU540 are configurations generated by a core generator. > > Now comes the question of whether its the right time to add a 'hifive1' or > 'hifiveu' machine. I don't think it is immediately necessary. The thought > being that we would be able to give a configuration string of file to > sifive_u e.g. "e51,u54,u54,u54". There is a different between the U54 and > the U54-MC which has an E51 core for management tasks. The PLIC has already > been written with this in mind, and is re-configurable to support the U54-MC > memory layout. Aren't the E51, U54, U54-MC, etc. all different SoCs? So doesn't it make sense to break out the SoCs and then in future the user can specify the SoC for the machine/board when they start QEMU? Alistair > > In anycase. The change is simply to use sifive_u_soc or sifive_u without the > 54 (given it configures with a U34 in 32-bit like the sifive_e configures > with an E51 in 64-bit mode, both valid configurations) >
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.