Hi Thomas,
nit: The commit subject prefix should simply be "amd_iommu".
On 7/31/26 10:02 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
>
> The code in amdvi_encode_event() calls amdvi_setevent_bits() with
> start = 64:
>
> amdvi_setevent_bits(evt, addr, 64, 64);
>
> and amdvi_setevent_bits() then calculates:
>
> uint64_t mask = MAKE_64BIT_MASK(start, length);
>
> but this MAKE_64BIT_MASK() macro shifts a value left by "start" bit
> positions. Shifting left by more than 63 is undefined behavior and
> could have unexpected results with different compilers / architectures.
>
> Fix it by using "bitpos" instead, which was likely the original
> intended behavior anyway. (bitpos is calculated as bitpos = start % 64).
>
Fixes: 1d5b128cbeea ("hw/iommu: Fix problems reported by Coverity scan")
> Resolves: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/work_items/3633
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alejandro Jimenez <alejandro.j.jimenez@oracle.com>
> ---
> hw/i386/amd_iommu.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/i386/amd_iommu.c b/hw/i386/amd_iommu.c
> index 90252c52af4..578c27ccbef 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/amd_iommu.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/amd_iommu.c
> @@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ static void amdvi_setevent_bits(uint64_t *buffer, uint64_t value, int start,
> int length)
> {
> int index = start / 64, bitpos = start % 64;
> - uint64_t mask = MAKE_64BIT_MASK(start, length);
> + uint64_t mask = MAKE_64BIT_MASK(bitpos, length);
> buffer[index] &= ~mask;
> buffer[index] |= (value << bitpos) & mask;
> }
> --
> 2.55.0
>