[PATCH v2 2/6] target/riscv: Introduce extension implied rule helpers

frank.chang@sifive.com posted 6 patches 5 months, 1 week ago
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH v2 2/6] target/riscv: Introduce extension implied rule helpers
Posted by frank.chang@sifive.com 5 months, 1 week ago
From: Frank Chang <frank.chang@sifive.com>

Introduce helpers to enable the extensions based on the implied rules.
The implied extensions are enabled recursively, so we don't have to
expand all of them manually. This also eliminates the old-fashioned
ordering requirement. For example, Zvksg implies Zvks, Zvks implies
Zvksed, etc., removing the need to check the implied rules of Zvksg
before Zvks.

Signed-off-by: Frank Chang <frank.chang@sifive.com>
Reviewed-by: Jerry Zhang Jian <jerry.zhangjian@sifive.com>
Tested-by: Max Chou <max.chou@sifive.com>
---
 target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c | 91 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 91 insertions(+)

diff --git a/target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c b/target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c
index eb6f7b9d12..f8d6371764 100644
--- a/target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c
+++ b/target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c
@@ -36,6 +36,9 @@
 static GHashTable *multi_ext_user_opts;
 static GHashTable *misa_ext_user_opts;
 
+static GHashTable *misa_implied_rules;
+static GHashTable *ext_implied_rules;
+
 static bool cpu_cfg_ext_is_user_set(uint32_t ext_offset)
 {
     return g_hash_table_contains(multi_ext_user_opts,
@@ -836,11 +839,97 @@ static void riscv_cpu_validate_profiles(RISCVCPU *cpu)
     }
 }
 
+static void riscv_cpu_init_implied_exts_rules(void)
+{
+    RISCVCPUImpliedExtsRule *rule;
+    int i;
+
+    for (i = 0; (rule = riscv_misa_implied_rules[i]); i++) {
+        g_hash_table_insert(misa_implied_rules, GUINT_TO_POINTER(rule->ext),
+                            (gpointer)rule);
+    }
+
+    for (i = 0; (rule = riscv_ext_implied_rules[i]); i++) {
+        g_hash_table_insert(ext_implied_rules, GUINT_TO_POINTER(rule->ext),
+                            (gpointer)rule);
+    }
+}
+
+static void cpu_enable_implied_rule(RISCVCPU *cpu,
+                                    RISCVCPUImpliedExtsRule *rule)
+{
+    CPURISCVState *env = &cpu->env;
+    RISCVCPUImpliedExtsRule *ir;
+    bool enabled = false;
+    int i;
+
+#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
+    enabled = qatomic_read(&rule->enabled) & BIT_ULL(cpu->env.mhartid);
+#endif
+
+    if (!enabled) {
+        /* Enable the implied MISAs. */
+        if (rule->implied_misas) {
+            riscv_cpu_set_misa_ext(env, env->misa_ext | rule->implied_misas);
+
+            for (i = 0; misa_bits[i] != 0; i++) {
+                if (rule->implied_misas & misa_bits[i]) {
+                    ir = g_hash_table_lookup(misa_implied_rules,
+                                             GUINT_TO_POINTER(misa_bits[i]));
+
+                    if (ir) {
+                        cpu_enable_implied_rule(cpu, ir);
+                    }
+                }
+            }
+        }
+
+        /* Enable the implied extensions. */
+        for (i = 0; rule->implied_exts[i] != RISCV_IMPLIED_EXTS_RULE_END; i++) {
+            cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update(cpu, rule->implied_exts[i], true);
+
+            ir = g_hash_table_lookup(ext_implied_rules,
+                                     GUINT_TO_POINTER(rule->implied_exts[i]));
+
+            if (ir) {
+                cpu_enable_implied_rule(cpu, ir);
+            }
+        }
+
+#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
+        qatomic_or(&rule->enabled, BIT_ULL(cpu->env.mhartid));
+#endif
+    }
+}
+
+static void riscv_cpu_enable_implied_rules(RISCVCPU *cpu)
+{
+    RISCVCPUImpliedExtsRule *rule;
+    int i;
+
+    /* Enable the implied MISAs. */
+    for (i = 0; (rule = riscv_misa_implied_rules[i]); i++) {
+        if (riscv_has_ext(&cpu->env, rule->ext)) {
+            cpu_enable_implied_rule(cpu, rule);
+        }
+    }
+
+    /* Enable the implied extensions. */
+    for (i = 0; (rule = riscv_ext_implied_rules[i]); i++) {
+        if (isa_ext_is_enabled(cpu, rule->ext)) {
+            cpu_enable_implied_rule(cpu, rule);
+        }
+    }
+}
+
 void riscv_tcg_cpu_finalize_features(RISCVCPU *cpu, Error **errp)
 {
     CPURISCVState *env = &cpu->env;
     Error *local_err = NULL;
 
+    riscv_cpu_init_implied_exts_rules();
+    riscv_cpu_enable_implied_rules(cpu);
+
     riscv_cpu_validate_misa_priv(env, &local_err);
     if (local_err != NULL) {
         error_propagate(errp, local_err);
@@ -1346,6 +1435,8 @@ static void riscv_tcg_cpu_instance_init(CPUState *cs)
 
     misa_ext_user_opts = g_hash_table_new(NULL, g_direct_equal);
     multi_ext_user_opts = g_hash_table_new(NULL, g_direct_equal);
+    misa_implied_rules = g_hash_table_new(NULL, g_direct_equal);
+    ext_implied_rules = g_hash_table_new(NULL, g_direct_equal);
     riscv_cpu_add_user_properties(obj);
 
     if (riscv_cpu_has_max_extensions(obj)) {
-- 
2.43.2
Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] target/riscv: Introduce extension implied rule helpers
Posted by Alistair Francis 5 months ago
On Sun, Jun 16, 2024 at 12:48 PM <frank.chang@sifive.com> wrote:
>
> From: Frank Chang <frank.chang@sifive.com>
>
> Introduce helpers to enable the extensions based on the implied rules.
> The implied extensions are enabled recursively, so we don't have to
> expand all of them manually. This also eliminates the old-fashioned
> ordering requirement. For example, Zvksg implies Zvks, Zvks implies
> Zvksed, etc., removing the need to check the implied rules of Zvksg
> before Zvks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Frank Chang <frank.chang@sifive.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jerry Zhang Jian <jerry.zhangjian@sifive.com>
> Tested-by: Max Chou <max.chou@sifive.com>
> ---
>  target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c | 91 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 91 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c b/target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c
> index eb6f7b9d12..f8d6371764 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c
> +++ b/target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c
> @@ -36,6 +36,9 @@
>  static GHashTable *multi_ext_user_opts;
>  static GHashTable *misa_ext_user_opts;
>
> +static GHashTable *misa_implied_rules;
> +static GHashTable *ext_implied_rules;
> +
>  static bool cpu_cfg_ext_is_user_set(uint32_t ext_offset)
>  {
>      return g_hash_table_contains(multi_ext_user_opts,
> @@ -836,11 +839,97 @@ static void riscv_cpu_validate_profiles(RISCVCPU *cpu)
>      }
>  }
>
> +static void riscv_cpu_init_implied_exts_rules(void)
> +{
> +    RISCVCPUImpliedExtsRule *rule;
> +    int i;
> +
> +    for (i = 0; (rule = riscv_misa_implied_rules[i]); i++) {
> +        g_hash_table_insert(misa_implied_rules, GUINT_TO_POINTER(rule->ext),
> +                            (gpointer)rule);
> +    }
> +
> +    for (i = 0; (rule = riscv_ext_implied_rules[i]); i++) {
> +        g_hash_table_insert(ext_implied_rules, GUINT_TO_POINTER(rule->ext),
> +                            (gpointer)rule);
> +    }
> +}
> +
> +static void cpu_enable_implied_rule(RISCVCPU *cpu,
> +                                    RISCVCPUImpliedExtsRule *rule)
> +{
> +    CPURISCVState *env = &cpu->env;
> +    RISCVCPUImpliedExtsRule *ir;
> +    bool enabled = false;
> +    int i;
> +
> +#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
> +    enabled = qatomic_read(&rule->enabled) & BIT_ULL(cpu->env.mhartid);

enabled is a uint64_t, so this limits us to 64 harts right?

The virt machine currently has a limit of 512, so this won't work right?

Alistair

> +#endif
> +
> +    if (!enabled) {
> +        /* Enable the implied MISAs. */
> +        if (rule->implied_misas) {
> +            riscv_cpu_set_misa_ext(env, env->misa_ext | rule->implied_misas);
> +
> +            for (i = 0; misa_bits[i] != 0; i++) {
> +                if (rule->implied_misas & misa_bits[i]) {
> +                    ir = g_hash_table_lookup(misa_implied_rules,
> +                                             GUINT_TO_POINTER(misa_bits[i]));
> +
> +                    if (ir) {
> +                        cpu_enable_implied_rule(cpu, ir);
> +                    }
> +                }
> +            }
> +        }
> +
> +        /* Enable the implied extensions. */
> +        for (i = 0; rule->implied_exts[i] != RISCV_IMPLIED_EXTS_RULE_END; i++) {
> +            cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update(cpu, rule->implied_exts[i], true);
> +
> +            ir = g_hash_table_lookup(ext_implied_rules,
> +                                     GUINT_TO_POINTER(rule->implied_exts[i]));
> +
> +            if (ir) {
> +                cpu_enable_implied_rule(cpu, ir);
> +            }
> +        }
> +
> +#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
> +        qatomic_or(&rule->enabled, BIT_ULL(cpu->env.mhartid));
> +#endif
> +    }
> +}
> +
> +static void riscv_cpu_enable_implied_rules(RISCVCPU *cpu)
> +{
> +    RISCVCPUImpliedExtsRule *rule;
> +    int i;
> +
> +    /* Enable the implied MISAs. */
> +    for (i = 0; (rule = riscv_misa_implied_rules[i]); i++) {
> +        if (riscv_has_ext(&cpu->env, rule->ext)) {
> +            cpu_enable_implied_rule(cpu, rule);
> +        }
> +    }
> +
> +    /* Enable the implied extensions. */
> +    for (i = 0; (rule = riscv_ext_implied_rules[i]); i++) {
> +        if (isa_ext_is_enabled(cpu, rule->ext)) {
> +            cpu_enable_implied_rule(cpu, rule);
> +        }
> +    }
> +}
> +
>  void riscv_tcg_cpu_finalize_features(RISCVCPU *cpu, Error **errp)
>  {
>      CPURISCVState *env = &cpu->env;
>      Error *local_err = NULL;
>
> +    riscv_cpu_init_implied_exts_rules();
> +    riscv_cpu_enable_implied_rules(cpu);
> +
>      riscv_cpu_validate_misa_priv(env, &local_err);
>      if (local_err != NULL) {
>          error_propagate(errp, local_err);
> @@ -1346,6 +1435,8 @@ static void riscv_tcg_cpu_instance_init(CPUState *cs)
>
>      misa_ext_user_opts = g_hash_table_new(NULL, g_direct_equal);
>      multi_ext_user_opts = g_hash_table_new(NULL, g_direct_equal);
> +    misa_implied_rules = g_hash_table_new(NULL, g_direct_equal);
> +    ext_implied_rules = g_hash_table_new(NULL, g_direct_equal);
>      riscv_cpu_add_user_properties(obj);
>
>      if (riscv_cpu_has_max_extensions(obj)) {
> --
> 2.43.2
>
>
Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] target/riscv: Introduce extension implied rule helpers
Posted by Frank Chang 5 months ago
On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 12:15 PM Alistair Francis <alistair23@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Sun, Jun 16, 2024 at 12:48 PM <frank.chang@sifive.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Frank Chang <frank.chang@sifive.com>
> >
> > Introduce helpers to enable the extensions based on the implied rules.
> > The implied extensions are enabled recursively, so we don't have to
> > expand all of them manually. This also eliminates the old-fashioned
> > ordering requirement. For example, Zvksg implies Zvks, Zvks implies
> > Zvksed, etc., removing the need to check the implied rules of Zvksg
> > before Zvks.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Frank Chang <frank.chang@sifive.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Jerry Zhang Jian <jerry.zhangjian@sifive.com>
> > Tested-by: Max Chou <max.chou@sifive.com>
> > ---
> >  target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c | 91 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 91 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c b/target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c
> > index eb6f7b9d12..f8d6371764 100644
> > --- a/target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c
> > +++ b/target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c
> > @@ -36,6 +36,9 @@
> >  static GHashTable *multi_ext_user_opts;
> >  static GHashTable *misa_ext_user_opts;
> >
> > +static GHashTable *misa_implied_rules;
> > +static GHashTable *ext_implied_rules;
> > +
> >  static bool cpu_cfg_ext_is_user_set(uint32_t ext_offset)
> >  {
> >      return g_hash_table_contains(multi_ext_user_opts,
> > @@ -836,11 +839,97 @@ static void riscv_cpu_validate_profiles(RISCVCPU
> *cpu)
> >      }
> >  }
> >
> > +static void riscv_cpu_init_implied_exts_rules(void)
> > +{
> > +    RISCVCPUImpliedExtsRule *rule;
> > +    int i;
> > +
> > +    for (i = 0; (rule = riscv_misa_implied_rules[i]); i++) {
> > +        g_hash_table_insert(misa_implied_rules,
> GUINT_TO_POINTER(rule->ext),
> > +                            (gpointer)rule);
> > +    }
> > +
> > +    for (i = 0; (rule = riscv_ext_implied_rules[i]); i++) {
> > +        g_hash_table_insert(ext_implied_rules,
> GUINT_TO_POINTER(rule->ext),
> > +                            (gpointer)rule);
> > +    }
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void cpu_enable_implied_rule(RISCVCPU *cpu,
> > +                                    RISCVCPUImpliedExtsRule *rule)
> > +{
> > +    CPURISCVState *env = &cpu->env;
> > +    RISCVCPUImpliedExtsRule *ir;
> > +    bool enabled = false;
> > +    int i;
> > +
> > +#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
> > +    enabled = qatomic_read(&rule->enabled) & BIT_ULL(cpu->env.mhartid);
>
> enabled is a uint64_t, so this limits us to 64 harts right?
>
> The virt machine currently has a limit of 512, so this won't work right?
>
> Alistair
>

Yes, that's true.
Though it wouldn't impact the result as this is just the optimization
of not iterating the rules that have been applied already.

Maybe I can replace it with the dynamic hart bitmask.

Regards,
Frank Chang


>
> > +#endif
> > +
> > +    if (!enabled) {
> > +        /* Enable the implied MISAs. */
> > +        if (rule->implied_misas) {
> > +            riscv_cpu_set_misa_ext(env, env->misa_ext |
> rule->implied_misas);
> > +
> > +            for (i = 0; misa_bits[i] != 0; i++) {
> > +                if (rule->implied_misas & misa_bits[i]) {
> > +                    ir = g_hash_table_lookup(misa_implied_rules,
> > +
>  GUINT_TO_POINTER(misa_bits[i]));
> > +
> > +                    if (ir) {
> > +                        cpu_enable_implied_rule(cpu, ir);
> > +                    }
> > +                }
> > +            }
> > +        }
> > +
> > +        /* Enable the implied extensions. */
> > +        for (i = 0; rule->implied_exts[i] !=
> RISCV_IMPLIED_EXTS_RULE_END; i++) {
> > +            cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update(cpu, rule->implied_exts[i], true);
> > +
> > +            ir = g_hash_table_lookup(ext_implied_rules,
> > +
>  GUINT_TO_POINTER(rule->implied_exts[i]));
> > +
> > +            if (ir) {
> > +                cpu_enable_implied_rule(cpu, ir);
> > +            }
> > +        }
> > +
> > +#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
> > +        qatomic_or(&rule->enabled, BIT_ULL(cpu->env.mhartid));
> > +#endif
> > +    }
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void riscv_cpu_enable_implied_rules(RISCVCPU *cpu)
> > +{
> > +    RISCVCPUImpliedExtsRule *rule;
> > +    int i;
> > +
> > +    /* Enable the implied MISAs. */
> > +    for (i = 0; (rule = riscv_misa_implied_rules[i]); i++) {
> > +        if (riscv_has_ext(&cpu->env, rule->ext)) {
> > +            cpu_enable_implied_rule(cpu, rule);
> > +        }
> > +    }
> > +
> > +    /* Enable the implied extensions. */
> > +    for (i = 0; (rule = riscv_ext_implied_rules[i]); i++) {
> > +        if (isa_ext_is_enabled(cpu, rule->ext)) {
> > +            cpu_enable_implied_rule(cpu, rule);
> > +        }
> > +    }
> > +}
> > +
> >  void riscv_tcg_cpu_finalize_features(RISCVCPU *cpu, Error **errp)
> >  {
> >      CPURISCVState *env = &cpu->env;
> >      Error *local_err = NULL;
> >
> > +    riscv_cpu_init_implied_exts_rules();
> > +    riscv_cpu_enable_implied_rules(cpu);
> > +
> >      riscv_cpu_validate_misa_priv(env, &local_err);
> >      if (local_err != NULL) {
> >          error_propagate(errp, local_err);
> > @@ -1346,6 +1435,8 @@ static void riscv_tcg_cpu_instance_init(CPUState
> *cs)
> >
> >      misa_ext_user_opts = g_hash_table_new(NULL, g_direct_equal);
> >      multi_ext_user_opts = g_hash_table_new(NULL, g_direct_equal);
> > +    misa_implied_rules = g_hash_table_new(NULL, g_direct_equal);
> > +    ext_implied_rules = g_hash_table_new(NULL, g_direct_equal);
> >      riscv_cpu_add_user_properties(obj);
> >
> >      if (riscv_cpu_has_max_extensions(obj)) {
> > --
> > 2.43.2
> >
> >
>
Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] target/riscv: Introduce extension implied rule helpers
Posted by Daniel Henrique Barboza 5 months, 1 week ago

On 6/15/24 11:46 PM, frank.chang@sifive.com wrote:
> From: Frank Chang <frank.chang@sifive.com>
> 
> Introduce helpers to enable the extensions based on the implied rules.
> The implied extensions are enabled recursively, so we don't have to
> expand all of them manually. This also eliminates the old-fashioned
> ordering requirement. For example, Zvksg implies Zvks, Zvks implies
> Zvksed, etc., removing the need to check the implied rules of Zvksg
> before Zvks.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Frank Chang <frank.chang@sifive.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jerry Zhang Jian <jerry.zhangjian@sifive.com>
> Tested-by: Max Chou <max.chou@sifive.com>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>

>   target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c | 91 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 91 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c b/target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c
> index eb6f7b9d12..f8d6371764 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c
> +++ b/target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c
> @@ -36,6 +36,9 @@
>   static GHashTable *multi_ext_user_opts;
>   static GHashTable *misa_ext_user_opts;
>   
> +static GHashTable *misa_implied_rules;
> +static GHashTable *ext_implied_rules;
> +
>   static bool cpu_cfg_ext_is_user_set(uint32_t ext_offset)
>   {
>       return g_hash_table_contains(multi_ext_user_opts,
> @@ -836,11 +839,97 @@ static void riscv_cpu_validate_profiles(RISCVCPU *cpu)
>       }
>   }
>   
> +static void riscv_cpu_init_implied_exts_rules(void)
> +{
> +    RISCVCPUImpliedExtsRule *rule;
> +    int i;
> +
> +    for (i = 0; (rule = riscv_misa_implied_rules[i]); i++) {
> +        g_hash_table_insert(misa_implied_rules, GUINT_TO_POINTER(rule->ext),
> +                            (gpointer)rule);
> +    }
> +
> +    for (i = 0; (rule = riscv_ext_implied_rules[i]); i++) {
> +        g_hash_table_insert(ext_implied_rules, GUINT_TO_POINTER(rule->ext),
> +                            (gpointer)rule);
> +    }
> +}
> +
> +static void cpu_enable_implied_rule(RISCVCPU *cpu,
> +                                    RISCVCPUImpliedExtsRule *rule)
> +{
> +    CPURISCVState *env = &cpu->env;
> +    RISCVCPUImpliedExtsRule *ir;
> +    bool enabled = false;
> +    int i;
> +
> +#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
> +    enabled = qatomic_read(&rule->enabled) & BIT_ULL(cpu->env.mhartid);
> +#endif
> +
> +    if (!enabled) {
> +        /* Enable the implied MISAs. */
> +        if (rule->implied_misas) {
> +            riscv_cpu_set_misa_ext(env, env->misa_ext | rule->implied_misas);
> +
> +            for (i = 0; misa_bits[i] != 0; i++) {
> +                if (rule->implied_misas & misa_bits[i]) {
> +                    ir = g_hash_table_lookup(misa_implied_rules,
> +                                             GUINT_TO_POINTER(misa_bits[i]));
> +
> +                    if (ir) {
> +                        cpu_enable_implied_rule(cpu, ir);
> +                    }
> +                }
> +            }
> +        }
> +
> +        /* Enable the implied extensions. */
> +        for (i = 0; rule->implied_exts[i] != RISCV_IMPLIED_EXTS_RULE_END; i++) {
> +            cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update(cpu, rule->implied_exts[i], true);
> +
> +            ir = g_hash_table_lookup(ext_implied_rules,
> +                                     GUINT_TO_POINTER(rule->implied_exts[i]));
> +
> +            if (ir) {
> +                cpu_enable_implied_rule(cpu, ir);
> +            }
> +        }
> +
> +#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
> +        qatomic_or(&rule->enabled, BIT_ULL(cpu->env.mhartid));
> +#endif
> +    }
> +}
> +
> +static void riscv_cpu_enable_implied_rules(RISCVCPU *cpu)
> +{
> +    RISCVCPUImpliedExtsRule *rule;
> +    int i;
> +
> +    /* Enable the implied MISAs. */
> +    for (i = 0; (rule = riscv_misa_implied_rules[i]); i++) {
> +        if (riscv_has_ext(&cpu->env, rule->ext)) {
> +            cpu_enable_implied_rule(cpu, rule);
> +        }
> +    }
> +
> +    /* Enable the implied extensions. */
> +    for (i = 0; (rule = riscv_ext_implied_rules[i]); i++) {
> +        if (isa_ext_is_enabled(cpu, rule->ext)) {
> +            cpu_enable_implied_rule(cpu, rule);
> +        }
> +    }
> +}
> +
>   void riscv_tcg_cpu_finalize_features(RISCVCPU *cpu, Error **errp)
>   {
>       CPURISCVState *env = &cpu->env;
>       Error *local_err = NULL;
>   
> +    riscv_cpu_init_implied_exts_rules();
> +    riscv_cpu_enable_implied_rules(cpu);
> +
>       riscv_cpu_validate_misa_priv(env, &local_err);
>       if (local_err != NULL) {
>           error_propagate(errp, local_err);
> @@ -1346,6 +1435,8 @@ static void riscv_tcg_cpu_instance_init(CPUState *cs)
>   
>       misa_ext_user_opts = g_hash_table_new(NULL, g_direct_equal);
>       multi_ext_user_opts = g_hash_table_new(NULL, g_direct_equal);
> +    misa_implied_rules = g_hash_table_new(NULL, g_direct_equal);
> +    ext_implied_rules = g_hash_table_new(NULL, g_direct_equal);
>       riscv_cpu_add_user_properties(obj);
>   
>       if (riscv_cpu_has_max_extensions(obj)) {