On 07/03/2024 17:43, Thomas Huth wrote:
> For consistency we should drop the names with a "+" in it in the
> long run.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
> ---
> docs/about/deprecated.rst | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/docs/about/deprecated.rst b/docs/about/deprecated.rst
> index 8565644da6..7058341f8f 100644
> --- a/docs/about/deprecated.rst
> +++ b/docs/about/deprecated.rst
> @@ -202,6 +202,15 @@ in the QEMU object model anymore. ``power5+``, ``power5+_v2.1``,
> an alias, but for consistency these will get removed in a future
> release, too. Use ``power5p_v2.1`` and ``power7p_v2.1`` instead.
>
> +``Sun-UltraSparc-IIIi+`` and ``Sun-UltraSparc-IV+`` CPU names (since 9.0)
> +'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
> +
> +The character "+" in device (and thus also CPU) names is not allowed
> +in the QEMU object model anymore. ``Sun-UltraSparc-IIIi+`` and
> +``Sun-UltraSparc-IV+`` are currently still supported via a workaround,
> +but for consistency these will get removed in a future release, too.
> +Use ``Sun-UltraSparc-IIIip`` and ``Sun-UltraSparc-IVp`` instead.
> +
> CRIS CPU architecture (since 9.0)
> '''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
See my previous comment about the CPU names, otherwise:
Reviewed-by: Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk>
ATB,
Mark.